Effects of pore morphology and moisture on CBM‐related sorption‐induced coal deformation: An experimental investigation

• Main Authors: Peng Chu, Qingquan Liu, Liang Wang, Ertao Chen, Xiaoxue Liao, Yuanyuan Liu, Wenyi Huang, Yuanping Cheng
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2021-08-01
• Series: Energy Science & Engineering
• Subjects: CBM; coal deformation; coal pore morphology; gas adsorption; moisture
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.881

Abstract Coalbed methane (CBM) is an important resource of energy. For CBM recovery, sorption‐induced coal deformation can cause significant reservoir permeability change. Moisture content and coal pore morphology affect the gas adsorption capacity and can alter the coal deformation of the coal seam. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a coal gas moisture‐coupled model for CBM production prediction. However, there are currently insufficient data available for quantitative analyses. In this paper, a series of typical sorption‐induced strain experiments were carried out during methane adsorption and desorption on coal samples with different metamorphic degrees and moisture content. The pore morphology and adsorption capacity of coals were measured to analyze the reason for different deformation of coals with various pore structures and moisture. Results show that the adsorption capacity and deformation is corresponding to the specific surface area of micropore, which first decreases and then increases with coal ranks. The deformation and adsorption gas content of dried coals is greater than that of natural moisture coals, which means that moisture can reduce the sorption capacity of coals, resulting in the decrease of gas adsorption‐induced coal deformation. There is also residual deformation of coal samples after gas desorption caused by the residual adsorbed gas in coals. This paper quantitatively investigates the effects of pore characteristics and moisture on coal deformation and the internal mechanism. This work will provide essential information for building out a fully cross‐coupled model of coal gas‐moisture relationships for CBM production prediction.