SEO valuation and insider manipulation of R&D

We examine a sample of 674 SEOs from 1999-2010 where reduced R&D spending is significantly associated with the lowering of insider ownership proportions. With this association established, we derive an R&D manipulation variable measuring underinvestment in R&D. We add to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert M. Hull, Sungkyu Kwak, Rosemary L. Walker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives" 2016-07-01
Series:Investment Management & Financial Innovations
Online Access:https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/7305/imfi_en_2016_02cont2_Hull.pdf
id doaj-da765826c2ae4aa58a705c2005b964df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-da765826c2ae4aa58a705c2005b964df2020-11-25T02:07:48ZengLLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"Investment Management & Financial Innovations 1810-49671812-93582016-07-0113226727810.21511/imfi.13(2-2).2016.017305SEO valuation and insider manipulation of R&DRobert M. Hull0Sungkyu KwakRosemary L. WalkerProfessor, Clarence W. King Endowed Chair in Finance, Washburn University School of BusinessWe examine a sample of 674 SEOs from 1999-2010 where reduced R&D spending is significantly associated with the lowering of insider ownership proportions. With this association established, we derive an R&D manipulation variable measuring underinvestment in R&D. We add to the SEO-R&D literature by examining the relation between R&D underinvestment and common stock valuation around SEOs. In contrast to the IPO research, we do not find that underinvestment in R&D leads to greater SEO stock valuations during the offer price setting process. Like the IPO research, we find that underinvestment in R&D leads to lower stock valuations for short-run post-offering tests. In contrast to the long-run IPO results, we find a significant association between R&D manipulation and stock valuation for long-run post-offering tests where underinvestment in R&D is associated with lower stock valuations. We also find the five % owner group for SEOs is important in explaining R&D manipulation and discover that underpricing for SEOs is not related to R&D manipulation. These latter two findings are different from IPOs. In conclusion, SEOs can be quite different from IPOs when examining the association between the insider manipulation of R&D and stock valuationhttps://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/7305/imfi_en_2016_02cont2_Hull.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert M. Hull
Sungkyu Kwak
Rosemary L. Walker
spellingShingle Robert M. Hull
Sungkyu Kwak
Rosemary L. Walker
SEO valuation and insider manipulation of R&D
Investment Management & Financial Innovations
author_facet Robert M. Hull
Sungkyu Kwak
Rosemary L. Walker
author_sort Robert M. Hull
title SEO valuation and insider manipulation of R&D
title_short SEO valuation and insider manipulation of R&D
title_full SEO valuation and insider manipulation of R&D
title_fullStr SEO valuation and insider manipulation of R&D
title_full_unstemmed SEO valuation and insider manipulation of R&D
title_sort seo valuation and insider manipulation of r&d
publisher LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"
series Investment Management & Financial Innovations
issn 1810-4967
1812-9358
publishDate 2016-07-01
description We examine a sample of 674 SEOs from 1999-2010 where reduced R&D spending is significantly associated with the lowering of insider ownership proportions. With this association established, we derive an R&D manipulation variable measuring underinvestment in R&D. We add to the SEO-R&D literature by examining the relation between R&D underinvestment and common stock valuation around SEOs. In contrast to the IPO research, we do not find that underinvestment in R&D leads to greater SEO stock valuations during the offer price setting process. Like the IPO research, we find that underinvestment in R&D leads to lower stock valuations for short-run post-offering tests. In contrast to the long-run IPO results, we find a significant association between R&D manipulation and stock valuation for long-run post-offering tests where underinvestment in R&D is associated with lower stock valuations. We also find the five % owner group for SEOs is important in explaining R&D manipulation and discover that underpricing for SEOs is not related to R&D manipulation. These latter two findings are different from IPOs. In conclusion, SEOs can be quite different from IPOs when examining the association between the insider manipulation of R&D and stock valuation
url https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/7305/imfi_en_2016_02cont2_Hull.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT robertmhull seovaluationandinsidermanipulationofrd
AT sungkyukwak seovaluationandinsidermanipulationofrd
AT rosemarylwalker seovaluationandinsidermanipulationofrd
_version_ 1724929647465988096