Effectiveness of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants after Less Invasive Surfactant Administration
Background Non-invasive ventilation is increased used in preterm infants. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) after less...
Main Author: | Ramadan Mahmoud |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
2019-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Pediatrics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ijp.mums.ac.ir/article_11472_3fa845d5345e19da3eef68e8e58e0ff0.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Initial treatment of respiratory distress syndrome with nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure: A randomized controlled trial
by: Amir-Mohammad Armanian, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Randomized controlled trial comparing nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants after tracheal extubation
by: Daniela Franco Rizzo Komatsu, et al. -
Flow-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in the preterm infant: development of a project
by: Corrado Moretti, et al.
Published: (2013-08-01) -
Comparing the Efficacy of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Early Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants
by: Manizheh Mostafa Gharehbaghi, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HHHFNC) is not an effective method for initial treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) versus nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)
by: Amir-Mohammad Armanian, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)