On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical Considerations
This paper starts with a detailed analysis of Jan Assmann’s qualitative distinction between cultural memory and communicative memory. The purpose of this analysis is to highlight both the strengths and the limitations of this seminal distinction, and to also reflect on what cultural theorists and co...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Warsaw
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/on-tradition-and-cultural-memory-in-contemporary-art/ |
id |
doaj-daa92653d54d45a090ee5aa47ea3641b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-daa92653d54d45a090ee5aa47ea3641b2021-07-28T14:09:06ZengUniversity of WarsawEidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture2544-302X2021-06-015112613910.14394/eidos.jpc.2021.0008On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical ConsiderationsMaria Alina Asavei0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-8044Institute of International Studies, Charles University, PragueThis paper starts with a detailed analysis of Jan Assmann’s qualitative distinction between cultural memory and communicative memory. The purpose of this analysis is to highlight both the strengths and the limitations of this seminal distinction, and to also reflect on what cultural theorists and contemporary artists could learn through Assmann’s distinction since artistic production also employs cultural memory formats that do not exclude cultural traditions in their materializations. In line with these considerations, this paper aims to disentangle what “tradition” means to contemporary artists. Following Edward Shils and Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophy of “tradition,” the paper argues that cultural tradition does not necessarily have an oppressive character and the rebellion and suspicion against it is at the heart of tradition itself. Thus, the traditional/contemporary binary can be precluded by reconsidering how “tradition” and “traditional” are conceptualized considering philosophy of tradition and artistic memory.http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/on-tradition-and-cultural-memory-in-contemporary-art/cultural traditionscultural memorycommunicative memorycontemporary arttraditionartistic memory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maria Alina Asavei |
spellingShingle |
Maria Alina Asavei On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical Considerations Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture cultural traditions cultural memory communicative memory contemporary art tradition artistic memory |
author_facet |
Maria Alina Asavei |
author_sort |
Maria Alina Asavei |
title |
On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical Considerations |
title_short |
On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical Considerations |
title_full |
On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical Considerations |
title_fullStr |
On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical Considerations |
title_full_unstemmed |
On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical Considerations |
title_sort |
on tradition and cultural memory in contemporary art: theoretical considerations |
publisher |
University of Warsaw |
series |
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture |
issn |
2544-302X |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
This paper starts with a detailed analysis of Jan Assmann’s qualitative distinction between cultural memory and communicative memory. The purpose of this analysis is to highlight both the strengths and the limitations of this seminal distinction, and to also reflect on what cultural theorists and contemporary artists could learn through Assmann’s distinction since artistic production also employs cultural memory formats that do not exclude cultural traditions in their materializations. In line with these considerations, this paper aims to disentangle what “tradition” means to contemporary artists. Following Edward Shils and Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophy of “tradition,” the paper argues that cultural tradition does not necessarily have an oppressive character and the rebellion and suspicion against it is at the heart of tradition itself. Thus, the traditional/contemporary binary can be precluded by reconsidering how “tradition” and “traditional” are conceptualized considering philosophy of tradition and artistic memory. |
topic |
cultural traditions cultural memory communicative memory contemporary art tradition artistic memory |
url |
http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/on-tradition-and-cultural-memory-in-contemporary-art/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariaalinaasavei ontraditionandculturalmemoryincontemporaryarttheoreticalconsiderations |
_version_ |
1721268171114020864 |