Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study

Abstract Grating interferometry mammography (GIM) is an experimental breast imaging method at the edge of being clinically implemented. Besides attenuation, GIM can measure the refraction and scattering of x-rays resulting in differential phase contrast (DPC) and dark-field (DF) images. In this expl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristina Lång, Carolina Arboleda, Serafino Forte, Zhentian Wang, Sven Prevrhal, Thomas Koehler, Norbert Kuhn, Bernd David, Konstantins Jefimovs, Rahel A. Kubik-Huch, Marco Stampanoni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-05-01
Series:European Radiology Experimental
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41747-019-0097-2
id doaj-dab2ce5acd414bdb8f5ffd2bf99e3fac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dab2ce5acd414bdb8f5ffd2bf99e3fac2020-11-25T02:57:41ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Radiology Experimental2509-92802019-05-01311610.1186/s41747-019-0097-2Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism studyKristina Lång0Carolina Arboleda1Serafino Forte2Zhentian Wang3Sven Prevrhal4Thomas Koehler5Norbert Kuhn6Bernd David7Konstantins Jefimovs8Rahel A. Kubik-Huch9Marco Stampanoni10Swiss Light Source, ETH Zurich, Paul Scherrer InstituteSwiss Light Source, ETH Zurich, Paul Scherrer InstituteDepartment of Radiology, Kantonsspital BadenSwiss Light Source, ETH Zurich, Paul Scherrer InstitutePhilips GmbH Innovative Technologies, Research Laboratories, Philips Research HamburgPhilips GmbH Innovative Technologies, Research Laboratories, Philips Research HamburgPhilips GmbH Innovative Technologies, Research Laboratories, Philips Research HamburgPhilips GmbH Innovative Technologies, Research Laboratories, Philips Research HamburgSwiss Light Source, ETH Zurich, Paul Scherrer InstituteDepartment of Radiology, Kantonsspital BadenSwiss Light Source, ETH Zurich, Paul Scherrer InstituteAbstract Grating interferometry mammography (GIM) is an experimental breast imaging method at the edge of being clinically implemented. Besides attenuation, GIM can measure the refraction and scattering of x-rays resulting in differential phase contrast (DPC) and dark-field (DF) images. In this exploratory study, we assessed the feasibility of using microbubbles as a contrast agent in GIM. Two millilitres of microbubbles and iodine were respectively injected into ex vivo breast phantoms, consisting of fresh chicken breasts. Native and postcontrast images were acquired with a clinically compatible GIM setup, operated at 38 kVp, 14-s acquisition time, and with a dose of 1.3 mGy. The visibility of the contrast agents was analysed in a side-by-side comparison by three radiologists. The contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) was calculated for each contrast agent. We found that both contrast agents were judged to be visible by the readers. The mean CNR was 3.1 ± 1.9 for microbubbles in DF and 24.2 ± 6.5 for iodine in attenuation. In conclusion, this is a first proof-of-mechanism study that microbubbles could be used as a contrast agent in clinically compatible GIM, due to their scattering properties, which implies the potential use of a contrast agent with a high safety profile in x-ray-based breast imaging.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41747-019-0097-2Contrast mediaInterferometryMammographyMicrobubblesPhantoms (imaging)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kristina Lång
Carolina Arboleda
Serafino Forte
Zhentian Wang
Sven Prevrhal
Thomas Koehler
Norbert Kuhn
Bernd David
Konstantins Jefimovs
Rahel A. Kubik-Huch
Marco Stampanoni
spellingShingle Kristina Lång
Carolina Arboleda
Serafino Forte
Zhentian Wang
Sven Prevrhal
Thomas Koehler
Norbert Kuhn
Bernd David
Konstantins Jefimovs
Rahel A. Kubik-Huch
Marco Stampanoni
Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study
European Radiology Experimental
Contrast media
Interferometry
Mammography
Microbubbles
Phantoms (imaging)
author_facet Kristina Lång
Carolina Arboleda
Serafino Forte
Zhentian Wang
Sven Prevrhal
Thomas Koehler
Norbert Kuhn
Bernd David
Konstantins Jefimovs
Rahel A. Kubik-Huch
Marco Stampanoni
author_sort Kristina Lång
title Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study
title_short Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study
title_full Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study
title_fullStr Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study
title_full_unstemmed Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study
title_sort microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study
publisher SpringerOpen
series European Radiology Experimental
issn 2509-9280
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Abstract Grating interferometry mammography (GIM) is an experimental breast imaging method at the edge of being clinically implemented. Besides attenuation, GIM can measure the refraction and scattering of x-rays resulting in differential phase contrast (DPC) and dark-field (DF) images. In this exploratory study, we assessed the feasibility of using microbubbles as a contrast agent in GIM. Two millilitres of microbubbles and iodine were respectively injected into ex vivo breast phantoms, consisting of fresh chicken breasts. Native and postcontrast images were acquired with a clinically compatible GIM setup, operated at 38 kVp, 14-s acquisition time, and with a dose of 1.3 mGy. The visibility of the contrast agents was analysed in a side-by-side comparison by three radiologists. The contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) was calculated for each contrast agent. We found that both contrast agents were judged to be visible by the readers. The mean CNR was 3.1 ± 1.9 for microbubbles in DF and 24.2 ± 6.5 for iodine in attenuation. In conclusion, this is a first proof-of-mechanism study that microbubbles could be used as a contrast agent in clinically compatible GIM, due to their scattering properties, which implies the potential use of a contrast agent with a high safety profile in x-ray-based breast imaging.
topic Contrast media
Interferometry
Mammography
Microbubbles
Phantoms (imaging)
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41747-019-0097-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kristinalang microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy
AT carolinaarboleda microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy
AT serafinoforte microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy
AT zhentianwang microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy
AT svenprevrhal microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy
AT thomaskoehler microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy
AT norbertkuhn microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy
AT bernddavid microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy
AT konstantinsjefimovs microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy
AT rahelakubikhuch microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy
AT marcostampanoni microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy
_version_ 1724709734609584128