In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics

Background. The present study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of metal bracket (MB) and ceramic bracket (CB) bonded to different CAD/CAM ceramic substrates etched with hydrofluoric acid (HFA) vs. phosphoric acid (PA). Methods. A total of 120 CAD/CAM ceramic blocks in 12 groups were fabricated fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eglal Ahmed Ghozy, Marwa Sameh Shamaa, Ahmed A. El-Bialy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
Subjects:
Online Access:https://joddd.tbzmed.ac.ir/PDF/joddd-14-239.pdf
id doaj-dacbf022a0354d57bed0b5b21212a919
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dacbf022a0354d57bed0b5b21212a9192021-05-08T05:27:37ZengTabriz University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects2008-210X2008-21182020-12-0114423924310.34172/joddd.2020.042joddd-29673In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramicsEglal Ahmed Ghozy0Marwa Sameh Shamaa1Ahmed A. El-Bialy2Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, EgyptDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, EgyptDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, EgyptBackground. The present study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of metal bracket (MB) and ceramic bracket (CB) bonded to different CAD/CAM ceramic substrates etched with hydrofluoric acid (HFA) vs. phosphoric acid (PA). Methods. A total of 120 CAD/CAM ceramic blocks in 12 groups were fabricated from three different CAD/CAM ceramic materials: VITABLOCS Mark II, VITAENAMIC, and IPS e.max CAD. Each ceramic material group was divided into two etching groups: one treated with 9.5% HFA and the other treated with 37%. Sixty metal and CBs of the upper right central incisor were bonded to the HFA-treated blocks. Another 60 metal and CBs were bonded to the PA treated blocks. All the bonded specimens were thermocycled before shear bond strength (SBS) testing. Then the bond failure mode was recorded Results. There were no significant differences in SBS values between the three CAD/CAM ceramic materials. The HFA-treated specimens exhibited significantly higher SBS values than the PA-treated specimens. Also, the SBS values of CBs were significantly higher than the metal brackets (MBs). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was 4 for most of the groups, indicating that almost no adhesive remained on the porcelain surface. Conclusion. The CAD/CAM ceramic type did not influence SBS; however, HFA exhibited significantly higher SBS compared to PA.https://joddd.tbzmed.ac.ir/PDF/joddd-14-239.pdfbond strengthcad/camorthodontic brackets
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eglal Ahmed Ghozy
Marwa Sameh Shamaa
Ahmed A. El-Bialy
spellingShingle Eglal Ahmed Ghozy
Marwa Sameh Shamaa
Ahmed A. El-Bialy
In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics
Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
bond strength
cad/cam
orthodontic brackets
author_facet Eglal Ahmed Ghozy
Marwa Sameh Shamaa
Ahmed A. El-Bialy
author_sort Eglal Ahmed Ghozy
title In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics
title_short In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics
title_full In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics
title_fullStr In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics
title_full_unstemmed In vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel CAD/CAM ceramics
title_sort in vitro testing of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different novel cad/cam ceramics
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
issn 2008-210X
2008-2118
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Background. The present study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of metal bracket (MB) and ceramic bracket (CB) bonded to different CAD/CAM ceramic substrates etched with hydrofluoric acid (HFA) vs. phosphoric acid (PA). Methods. A total of 120 CAD/CAM ceramic blocks in 12 groups were fabricated from three different CAD/CAM ceramic materials: VITABLOCS Mark II, VITAENAMIC, and IPS e.max CAD. Each ceramic material group was divided into two etching groups: one treated with 9.5% HFA and the other treated with 37%. Sixty metal and CBs of the upper right central incisor were bonded to the HFA-treated blocks. Another 60 metal and CBs were bonded to the PA treated blocks. All the bonded specimens were thermocycled before shear bond strength (SBS) testing. Then the bond failure mode was recorded Results. There were no significant differences in SBS values between the three CAD/CAM ceramic materials. The HFA-treated specimens exhibited significantly higher SBS values than the PA-treated specimens. Also, the SBS values of CBs were significantly higher than the metal brackets (MBs). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was 4 for most of the groups, indicating that almost no adhesive remained on the porcelain surface. Conclusion. The CAD/CAM ceramic type did not influence SBS; however, HFA exhibited significantly higher SBS compared to PA.
topic bond strength
cad/cam
orthodontic brackets
url https://joddd.tbzmed.ac.ir/PDF/joddd-14-239.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT eglalahmedghozy invitrotestingofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedtodifferentnovelcadcamceramics
AT marwasamehshamaa invitrotestingofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedtodifferentnovelcadcamceramics
AT ahmedaelbialy invitrotestingofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketsbondedtodifferentnovelcadcamceramics
_version_ 1721455088126394368