A dual padding method for ischial pressure sore reconstruction with an inferior gluteal artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and a split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flap

Background Various surgical management methods have been proposed for ischial sore reconstruction, yet it has the highest recurrence rate of all pressure ulcer types. A novel approach combining the advantages of a perforator-based fasciocutaneous flap and a muscle flap is expected to resolve the dis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Inhoe Ku, Gordon K. Lee, Saehoon Yoon, Euicheol Jeong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2019-09-01
Series:Archives of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2019-00031.pdf
id doaj-daedee27bf484a8899022249ef05c922
record_format Article
spelling doaj-daedee27bf484a8899022249ef05c9222020-11-24T21:59:51ZengKorean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeonsArchives of Plastic Surgery2234-61632234-61712019-09-0146545546110.5999/aps.2019.000313672A dual padding method for ischial pressure sore reconstruction with an inferior gluteal artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and a split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flapInhoe Ku0Gordon K. Lee1Saehoon Yoon2Euicheol Jeong3 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA Department of Plastic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea Department of Plastic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, KoreaBackground Various surgical management methods have been proposed for ischial sore reconstruction, yet it has the highest recurrence rate of all pressure ulcer types. A novel approach combining the advantages of a perforator-based fasciocutaneous flap and a muscle flap is expected to resolve the disadvantages of previously introduced surgical methods. Methods Fifteen patients with ischial pressure ulcers with chronic osteomyelitis or bursitis, who underwent reconstructive procedures with an inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) fasciocutaneous flap and a split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flap from January 2011 to June 2016, were analyzed retrospectively. The split muscle flap was rotated to obliterate the deep ischial defect, managing the osteomyelitis or bursitis, and the IGAP fasciocutaneous flap was rotated or advanced to cover the superficial layer. The patients’ age, sex, presence of bursitis or osteomyelitis, surgical details, complications, follow-up period, and ischial sore recurrence were reviewed. Results All ischial pressure ulcers were successfully reconstructed without any flap loss. The mean duration of follow-up was 12.9 months (range, 3–35 months). Of 15 patients, one had a recurrent ulcer 10 months postoperatively, which was repaired by re-advancing the previously elevated fasciocutaneous flap. Conclusions The dual-flap procedure with an IGAP fasciocutaneous flap and split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flap for ischial pressure ulcer reconstruction is a useful method that combines the useful characteristics of perforator and muscle flaps, providing thick dual padding with sufficient vascularization while minimizing donor morbidity and vascular pedicle injury.http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2019-00031.pdfPressure ulcerSurgical flapsOsteomyelitisBursitisIschium
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Inhoe Ku
Gordon K. Lee
Saehoon Yoon
Euicheol Jeong
spellingShingle Inhoe Ku
Gordon K. Lee
Saehoon Yoon
Euicheol Jeong
A dual padding method for ischial pressure sore reconstruction with an inferior gluteal artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and a split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flap
Archives of Plastic Surgery
Pressure ulcer
Surgical flaps
Osteomyelitis
Bursitis
Ischium
author_facet Inhoe Ku
Gordon K. Lee
Saehoon Yoon
Euicheol Jeong
author_sort Inhoe Ku
title A dual padding method for ischial pressure sore reconstruction with an inferior gluteal artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and a split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flap
title_short A dual padding method for ischial pressure sore reconstruction with an inferior gluteal artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and a split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flap
title_full A dual padding method for ischial pressure sore reconstruction with an inferior gluteal artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and a split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flap
title_fullStr A dual padding method for ischial pressure sore reconstruction with an inferior gluteal artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and a split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flap
title_full_unstemmed A dual padding method for ischial pressure sore reconstruction with an inferior gluteal artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and a split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flap
title_sort dual padding method for ischial pressure sore reconstruction with an inferior gluteal artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and a split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flap
publisher Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
series Archives of Plastic Surgery
issn 2234-6163
2234-6171
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Background Various surgical management methods have been proposed for ischial sore reconstruction, yet it has the highest recurrence rate of all pressure ulcer types. A novel approach combining the advantages of a perforator-based fasciocutaneous flap and a muscle flap is expected to resolve the disadvantages of previously introduced surgical methods. Methods Fifteen patients with ischial pressure ulcers with chronic osteomyelitis or bursitis, who underwent reconstructive procedures with an inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) fasciocutaneous flap and a split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flap from January 2011 to June 2016, were analyzed retrospectively. The split muscle flap was rotated to obliterate the deep ischial defect, managing the osteomyelitis or bursitis, and the IGAP fasciocutaneous flap was rotated or advanced to cover the superficial layer. The patients’ age, sex, presence of bursitis or osteomyelitis, surgical details, complications, follow-up period, and ischial sore recurrence were reviewed. Results All ischial pressure ulcers were successfully reconstructed without any flap loss. The mean duration of follow-up was 12.9 months (range, 3–35 months). Of 15 patients, one had a recurrent ulcer 10 months postoperatively, which was repaired by re-advancing the previously elevated fasciocutaneous flap. Conclusions The dual-flap procedure with an IGAP fasciocutaneous flap and split inferior gluteus maximus muscle flap for ischial pressure ulcer reconstruction is a useful method that combines the useful characteristics of perforator and muscle flaps, providing thick dual padding with sufficient vascularization while minimizing donor morbidity and vascular pedicle injury.
topic Pressure ulcer
Surgical flaps
Osteomyelitis
Bursitis
Ischium
url http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2019-00031.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT inhoeku adualpaddingmethodforischialpressuresorereconstructionwithaninferiorglutealarteryperforatorfasciocutaneousflapandasplitinferiorgluteusmaximusmuscleflap
AT gordonklee adualpaddingmethodforischialpressuresorereconstructionwithaninferiorglutealarteryperforatorfasciocutaneousflapandasplitinferiorgluteusmaximusmuscleflap
AT saehoonyoon adualpaddingmethodforischialpressuresorereconstructionwithaninferiorglutealarteryperforatorfasciocutaneousflapandasplitinferiorgluteusmaximusmuscleflap
AT euicheoljeong adualpaddingmethodforischialpressuresorereconstructionwithaninferiorglutealarteryperforatorfasciocutaneousflapandasplitinferiorgluteusmaximusmuscleflap
AT inhoeku dualpaddingmethodforischialpressuresorereconstructionwithaninferiorglutealarteryperforatorfasciocutaneousflapandasplitinferiorgluteusmaximusmuscleflap
AT gordonklee dualpaddingmethodforischialpressuresorereconstructionwithaninferiorglutealarteryperforatorfasciocutaneousflapandasplitinferiorgluteusmaximusmuscleflap
AT saehoonyoon dualpaddingmethodforischialpressuresorereconstructionwithaninferiorglutealarteryperforatorfasciocutaneousflapandasplitinferiorgluteusmaximusmuscleflap
AT euicheoljeong dualpaddingmethodforischialpressuresorereconstructionwithaninferiorglutealarteryperforatorfasciocutaneousflapandasplitinferiorgluteusmaximusmuscleflap
_version_ 1725846859702861824