Tantalum, Niobium and Titanium Coatings for Biocompatibility Improvement of Dental Implants

Introduction: Metals have a wide range of applications in implant and prosthetic materials in dentistry.Corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of metals should be improved in order to utilizethem as biomaterials. The aim of this work was to prepare metallic coatings on 316L stainless steel dental...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vajihesadat Mortazavi, Mohammad Hossein Fathi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2007-01-01
Series:Dental Research Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.mui.ac.ir/drj/article/view/2131/842
id doaj-dafd42b5b53a492faf5eab3425746ecc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dafd42b5b53a492faf5eab3425746ecc2020-11-25T00:57:56ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDental Research Journal1735-33272008-02552007-01-01427482Tantalum, Niobium and Titanium Coatings for Biocompatibility Improvement of Dental ImplantsVajihesadat MortazaviMohammad Hossein FathiIntroduction: Metals have a wide range of applications in implant and prosthetic materials in dentistry.Corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of metals should be improved in order to utilizethem as biomaterials. The aim of this work was to prepare metallic coatings on 316L stainless steel dental implants, to evaluate the corrosion characteristics of the uncoated and metallic coated dentalimplants as an indication of biocompatibility and, to compare the effect of the type of the coatings on biocompatibility.Materials and Methods: In this in vitro evaluation, three types of metallic coatings including tantalum, niobium and titanium coatings were compared using a physical vapor deposition process on 316L stainless steel dental implants. Structural characterization techniques including X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis were utilized to investigatethe microstructure and morphology of the coatings. Electrochemical potentiodynamic tests were performed in two types of physiological solutions at 37±1°C in order to determine and compare the corrosioncurrent density and corrosion potential characteristics. The mean values were statistically compared by ANOVA at a 95% level of confidence.Results: the findings showed that all of the three types of metallic coatings had a positive effect on improvement of the corrosion behavior. The coatings could increase the corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel and this trend was independent of the type of physiological environment.Conclusion: The biocompatible metallic coatings could decrease the corrosion current density and is a distinct advantage for prevention of ion release. Decreasing ion release can improve the biocompatibility of the dental implant, and consequently can prevent tissue damage, tissue inflammation and irritation, and can also lead to obtaining a desirable histopathological response.http://journals.mui.ac.ir/drj/article/view/2131/842AISI 316L StainlessBiocompatibilityCorrosion behaviorDental implantMetallic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vajihesadat Mortazavi
Mohammad Hossein Fathi
spellingShingle Vajihesadat Mortazavi
Mohammad Hossein Fathi
Tantalum, Niobium and Titanium Coatings for Biocompatibility Improvement of Dental Implants
Dental Research Journal
AISI 316L Stainless
Biocompatibility
Corrosion behavior
Dental implant
Metallic
author_facet Vajihesadat Mortazavi
Mohammad Hossein Fathi
author_sort Vajihesadat Mortazavi
title Tantalum, Niobium and Titanium Coatings for Biocompatibility Improvement of Dental Implants
title_short Tantalum, Niobium and Titanium Coatings for Biocompatibility Improvement of Dental Implants
title_full Tantalum, Niobium and Titanium Coatings for Biocompatibility Improvement of Dental Implants
title_fullStr Tantalum, Niobium and Titanium Coatings for Biocompatibility Improvement of Dental Implants
title_full_unstemmed Tantalum, Niobium and Titanium Coatings for Biocompatibility Improvement of Dental Implants
title_sort tantalum, niobium and titanium coatings for biocompatibility improvement of dental implants
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Dental Research Journal
issn 1735-3327
2008-0255
publishDate 2007-01-01
description Introduction: Metals have a wide range of applications in implant and prosthetic materials in dentistry.Corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of metals should be improved in order to utilizethem as biomaterials. The aim of this work was to prepare metallic coatings on 316L stainless steel dental implants, to evaluate the corrosion characteristics of the uncoated and metallic coated dentalimplants as an indication of biocompatibility and, to compare the effect of the type of the coatings on biocompatibility.Materials and Methods: In this in vitro evaluation, three types of metallic coatings including tantalum, niobium and titanium coatings were compared using a physical vapor deposition process on 316L stainless steel dental implants. Structural characterization techniques including X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis were utilized to investigatethe microstructure and morphology of the coatings. Electrochemical potentiodynamic tests were performed in two types of physiological solutions at 37±1°C in order to determine and compare the corrosioncurrent density and corrosion potential characteristics. The mean values were statistically compared by ANOVA at a 95% level of confidence.Results: the findings showed that all of the three types of metallic coatings had a positive effect on improvement of the corrosion behavior. The coatings could increase the corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel and this trend was independent of the type of physiological environment.Conclusion: The biocompatible metallic coatings could decrease the corrosion current density and is a distinct advantage for prevention of ion release. Decreasing ion release can improve the biocompatibility of the dental implant, and consequently can prevent tissue damage, tissue inflammation and irritation, and can also lead to obtaining a desirable histopathological response.
topic AISI 316L Stainless
Biocompatibility
Corrosion behavior
Dental implant
Metallic
url http://journals.mui.ac.ir/drj/article/view/2131/842
work_keys_str_mv AT vajihesadatmortazavi tantalumniobiumandtitaniumcoatingsforbiocompatibilityimprovementofdentalimplants
AT mohammadhosseinfathi tantalumniobiumandtitaniumcoatingsforbiocompatibilityimprovementofdentalimplants
_version_ 1725222165479948288