Measuring hedonia and eudaimonia as motives for activities: Cross-national investigation through traditional and Bayesian structural equation modeling

Two major goals of this paper were, first to examine the cross-cultural consistency of the factor structure of the Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities (HEMA) scale, and second to illustrate the advantages of using Bayesian estimation for such an examination. Bayesian estimation allows for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aleksandra eBujacz, Joar eVittersø, Veronika eHuta, Lukasz Dominik Kaczmarek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00984/full
id doaj-db5ec6165ba7496bbe46c8d83f4fd59a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-db5ec6165ba7496bbe46c8d83f4fd59a2020-11-24T22:39:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-09-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0098498884Measuring hedonia and eudaimonia as motives for activities: Cross-national investigation through traditional and Bayesian structural equation modelingAleksandra eBujacz0Aleksandra eBujacz1Joar eVittersø2Veronika eHuta3Lukasz Dominik Kaczmarek4Adam Mickiewicz UniversityUniversity of TromsøUniversity of TromsøUniversity of OttawaAdam Mickiewicz UniversityTwo major goals of this paper were, first to examine the cross-cultural consistency of the factor structure of the Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities (HEMA) scale, and second to illustrate the advantages of using Bayesian estimation for such an examination. Bayesian estimation allows for more flexibility in model specification by making it possible to replace exact zero constraints (e.g. no cross-loadings) with approximate zero constraints (e.g. small cross-loadings). The stability of the constructs measured by the HEMA scale was tested across two national samples (Polish and North American) using both traditional and Bayesian estimation. First, a three-factor model (with hedonic pleasure, hedonic comfort and eudaimonic factors) was confirmed in both samples. Second, a model representing the metric invariance was tested. A traditional approach with maximum likelihood estimation reported a misfit of the model, leading to the acceptance of only a partial metric invariance structure. Bayesian estimation - that allowed for small and sample specific cross-loadings – allowed for the metric invariance model. The scalar invariance was not supported, therefore the comparison between latent factor means was not possible. Both traditional and Bayesian procedures revealed a similar latent factor correlation pattern within each of the national groups. The results suggest that the connection between hedonic and eudaimonic motives depends on which of the two hedonic dimensions is considered. In both groups the association between the eudaimonic factor and the hedonic comfort factor was weaker than the correlation between the hedonic pleasure factor and the eudaimonic factor. In summary, this paper explained the cross-national stability of the three-factor structure of the HEMA scale. In addition, it showed that the Bayesian approach is more informative than the traditional one, because it allows for more flexibility in model specification.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00984/fullMeasurement invarianceWell-beingBayesian structural equation modelinghedoniaeudaimonia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aleksandra eBujacz
Aleksandra eBujacz
Joar eVittersø
Veronika eHuta
Lukasz Dominik Kaczmarek
spellingShingle Aleksandra eBujacz
Aleksandra eBujacz
Joar eVittersø
Veronika eHuta
Lukasz Dominik Kaczmarek
Measuring hedonia and eudaimonia as motives for activities: Cross-national investigation through traditional and Bayesian structural equation modeling
Frontiers in Psychology
Measurement invariance
Well-being
Bayesian structural equation modeling
hedonia
eudaimonia
author_facet Aleksandra eBujacz
Aleksandra eBujacz
Joar eVittersø
Veronika eHuta
Lukasz Dominik Kaczmarek
author_sort Aleksandra eBujacz
title Measuring hedonia and eudaimonia as motives for activities: Cross-national investigation through traditional and Bayesian structural equation modeling
title_short Measuring hedonia and eudaimonia as motives for activities: Cross-national investigation through traditional and Bayesian structural equation modeling
title_full Measuring hedonia and eudaimonia as motives for activities: Cross-national investigation through traditional and Bayesian structural equation modeling
title_fullStr Measuring hedonia and eudaimonia as motives for activities: Cross-national investigation through traditional and Bayesian structural equation modeling
title_full_unstemmed Measuring hedonia and eudaimonia as motives for activities: Cross-national investigation through traditional and Bayesian structural equation modeling
title_sort measuring hedonia and eudaimonia as motives for activities: cross-national investigation through traditional and bayesian structural equation modeling
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-09-01
description Two major goals of this paper were, first to examine the cross-cultural consistency of the factor structure of the Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities (HEMA) scale, and second to illustrate the advantages of using Bayesian estimation for such an examination. Bayesian estimation allows for more flexibility in model specification by making it possible to replace exact zero constraints (e.g. no cross-loadings) with approximate zero constraints (e.g. small cross-loadings). The stability of the constructs measured by the HEMA scale was tested across two national samples (Polish and North American) using both traditional and Bayesian estimation. First, a three-factor model (with hedonic pleasure, hedonic comfort and eudaimonic factors) was confirmed in both samples. Second, a model representing the metric invariance was tested. A traditional approach with maximum likelihood estimation reported a misfit of the model, leading to the acceptance of only a partial metric invariance structure. Bayesian estimation - that allowed for small and sample specific cross-loadings – allowed for the metric invariance model. The scalar invariance was not supported, therefore the comparison between latent factor means was not possible. Both traditional and Bayesian procedures revealed a similar latent factor correlation pattern within each of the national groups. The results suggest that the connection between hedonic and eudaimonic motives depends on which of the two hedonic dimensions is considered. In both groups the association between the eudaimonic factor and the hedonic comfort factor was weaker than the correlation between the hedonic pleasure factor and the eudaimonic factor. In summary, this paper explained the cross-national stability of the three-factor structure of the HEMA scale. In addition, it showed that the Bayesian approach is more informative than the traditional one, because it allows for more flexibility in model specification.
topic Measurement invariance
Well-being
Bayesian structural equation modeling
hedonia
eudaimonia
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00984/full
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksandraebujacz measuringhedoniaandeudaimoniaasmotivesforactivitiescrossnationalinvestigationthroughtraditionalandbayesianstructuralequationmodeling
AT aleksandraebujacz measuringhedoniaandeudaimoniaasmotivesforactivitiescrossnationalinvestigationthroughtraditionalandbayesianstructuralequationmodeling
AT joarevittersø measuringhedoniaandeudaimoniaasmotivesforactivitiescrossnationalinvestigationthroughtraditionalandbayesianstructuralequationmodeling
AT veronikaehuta measuringhedoniaandeudaimoniaasmotivesforactivitiescrossnationalinvestigationthroughtraditionalandbayesianstructuralequationmodeling
AT lukaszdominikkaczmarek measuringhedoniaandeudaimoniaasmotivesforactivitiescrossnationalinvestigationthroughtraditionalandbayesianstructuralequationmodeling
_version_ 1725708387743694848