Strategy and Decision Making in Karate

Karate will be included in the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo as an additional sport. The inner logic of this activity includes a specific scoring system and way of modeling. Three hundred and nine bouts were observed in the competition context, which resulted in new perspectives on training and comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jérôme Frigout, Sophie Tasseel-Ponche, Arnaud Delafontaine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03025/full
id doaj-db8d4cb95c2041e3a5fcd9d758a65cac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-db8d4cb95c2041e3a5fcd9d758a65cac2020-11-25T01:23:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-01-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.03025508373Strategy and Decision Making in KarateJérôme Frigout0Sophie Tasseel-Ponche1Sophie Tasseel-Ponche2Arnaud Delafontaine3Arnaud Delafontaine4I3SP Laboratory, Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, Paris Descartes University, Paris, FranceMédecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, FranceEA 4559, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Fonctionnelles et Pathologies, Centre Universitaire de Recherche en Santé, CHU Sud, Amiens, FranceCIAMS, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, FranceCIAMS, Université d’Orléans, Orléans, FranceKarate will be included in the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo as an additional sport. The inner logic of this activity includes a specific scoring system and way of modeling. Three hundred and nine bouts were observed in the competition context, which resulted in new perspectives on training and competition. The scoring of punches (43.7% of total scored points) and face kicks (37.9%) appears to be more significant (p ≤ 0.01) than that of body kicks (15.3%, p ≤ 0.01) and leg-sweeping (3.1%, p = 0.31). Penalties appear to be very significant and associated with victory when “scored” by the competitor against himself or herself (p ≤ 0.01). Competitors must score points and penalties. This zero-sum game induces a simple rivalry, whose purpose is domination and which must rely on a predefined strategy and initiative. Karatekas have to make decisions, such as when taking the risk to score points and penalties, whether or not they lead the score. Karatekas may decide to expose or protect themselves, create situations, or simply remain realistic and adhere to the plan. The question of decision making, which is central to this work, forces us to focus our future work on the notions of expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03025/fullkaratemodelinginner logicstrategydecision making
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jérôme Frigout
Sophie Tasseel-Ponche
Sophie Tasseel-Ponche
Arnaud Delafontaine
Arnaud Delafontaine
spellingShingle Jérôme Frigout
Sophie Tasseel-Ponche
Sophie Tasseel-Ponche
Arnaud Delafontaine
Arnaud Delafontaine
Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
Frontiers in Psychology
karate
modeling
inner logic
strategy
decision making
author_facet Jérôme Frigout
Sophie Tasseel-Ponche
Sophie Tasseel-Ponche
Arnaud Delafontaine
Arnaud Delafontaine
author_sort Jérôme Frigout
title Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
title_short Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
title_full Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
title_fullStr Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
title_full_unstemmed Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
title_sort strategy and decision making in karate
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Karate will be included in the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo as an additional sport. The inner logic of this activity includes a specific scoring system and way of modeling. Three hundred and nine bouts were observed in the competition context, which resulted in new perspectives on training and competition. The scoring of punches (43.7% of total scored points) and face kicks (37.9%) appears to be more significant (p ≤ 0.01) than that of body kicks (15.3%, p ≤ 0.01) and leg-sweeping (3.1%, p = 0.31). Penalties appear to be very significant and associated with victory when “scored” by the competitor against himself or herself (p ≤ 0.01). Competitors must score points and penalties. This zero-sum game induces a simple rivalry, whose purpose is domination and which must rely on a predefined strategy and initiative. Karatekas have to make decisions, such as when taking the risk to score points and penalties, whether or not they lead the score. Karatekas may decide to expose or protect themselves, create situations, or simply remain realistic and adhere to the plan. The question of decision making, which is central to this work, forces us to focus our future work on the notions of expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies.
topic karate
modeling
inner logic
strategy
decision making
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03025/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jeromefrigout strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate
AT sophietasseelponche strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate
AT sophietasseelponche strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate
AT arnauddelafontaine strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate
AT arnauddelafontaine strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate
_version_ 1725121520448045056