Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
Karate will be included in the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo as an additional sport. The inner logic of this activity includes a specific scoring system and way of modeling. Three hundred and nine bouts were observed in the competition context, which resulted in new perspectives on training and comp...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03025/full |
id |
doaj-db8d4cb95c2041e3a5fcd9d758a65cac |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-db8d4cb95c2041e3a5fcd9d758a65cac2020-11-25T01:23:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-01-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.03025508373Strategy and Decision Making in KarateJérôme Frigout0Sophie Tasseel-Ponche1Sophie Tasseel-Ponche2Arnaud Delafontaine3Arnaud Delafontaine4I3SP Laboratory, Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, Paris Descartes University, Paris, FranceMédecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, FranceEA 4559, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Fonctionnelles et Pathologies, Centre Universitaire de Recherche en Santé, CHU Sud, Amiens, FranceCIAMS, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, FranceCIAMS, Université d’Orléans, Orléans, FranceKarate will be included in the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo as an additional sport. The inner logic of this activity includes a specific scoring system and way of modeling. Three hundred and nine bouts were observed in the competition context, which resulted in new perspectives on training and competition. The scoring of punches (43.7% of total scored points) and face kicks (37.9%) appears to be more significant (p ≤ 0.01) than that of body kicks (15.3%, p ≤ 0.01) and leg-sweeping (3.1%, p = 0.31). Penalties appear to be very significant and associated with victory when “scored” by the competitor against himself or herself (p ≤ 0.01). Competitors must score points and penalties. This zero-sum game induces a simple rivalry, whose purpose is domination and which must rely on a predefined strategy and initiative. Karatekas have to make decisions, such as when taking the risk to score points and penalties, whether or not they lead the score. Karatekas may decide to expose or protect themselves, create situations, or simply remain realistic and adhere to the plan. The question of decision making, which is central to this work, forces us to focus our future work on the notions of expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03025/fullkaratemodelinginner logicstrategydecision making |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jérôme Frigout Sophie Tasseel-Ponche Sophie Tasseel-Ponche Arnaud Delafontaine Arnaud Delafontaine |
spellingShingle |
Jérôme Frigout Sophie Tasseel-Ponche Sophie Tasseel-Ponche Arnaud Delafontaine Arnaud Delafontaine Strategy and Decision Making in Karate Frontiers in Psychology karate modeling inner logic strategy decision making |
author_facet |
Jérôme Frigout Sophie Tasseel-Ponche Sophie Tasseel-Ponche Arnaud Delafontaine Arnaud Delafontaine |
author_sort |
Jérôme Frigout |
title |
Strategy and Decision Making in Karate |
title_short |
Strategy and Decision Making in Karate |
title_full |
Strategy and Decision Making in Karate |
title_fullStr |
Strategy and Decision Making in Karate |
title_full_unstemmed |
Strategy and Decision Making in Karate |
title_sort |
strategy and decision making in karate |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Karate will be included in the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo as an additional sport. The inner logic of this activity includes a specific scoring system and way of modeling. Three hundred and nine bouts were observed in the competition context, which resulted in new perspectives on training and competition. The scoring of punches (43.7% of total scored points) and face kicks (37.9%) appears to be more significant (p ≤ 0.01) than that of body kicks (15.3%, p ≤ 0.01) and leg-sweeping (3.1%, p = 0.31). Penalties appear to be very significant and associated with victory when “scored” by the competitor against himself or herself (p ≤ 0.01). Competitors must score points and penalties. This zero-sum game induces a simple rivalry, whose purpose is domination and which must rely on a predefined strategy and initiative. Karatekas have to make decisions, such as when taking the risk to score points and penalties, whether or not they lead the score. Karatekas may decide to expose or protect themselves, create situations, or simply remain realistic and adhere to the plan. The question of decision making, which is central to this work, forces us to focus our future work on the notions of expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies. |
topic |
karate modeling inner logic strategy decision making |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03025/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jeromefrigout strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate AT sophietasseelponche strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate AT sophietasseelponche strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate AT arnauddelafontaine strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate AT arnauddelafontaine strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate |
_version_ |
1725121520448045056 |