Bending and Fitting: Disciplinarized Institutionalization of Modern Science in China during the ‘Treaty Century’
This article investigates how Western science established itself through disciplinarized institutionalization in China as the country entered the modern era, delineating China’s science and technology (S&T) enterprises evolving within the social settings primarily decided by Confucianism doc...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Social Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/4/153 |
id |
doaj-db9471bb830f47af88a70bd6d95bbded |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-db9471bb830f47af88a70bd6d95bbded2020-11-25T02:43:10ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602017-12-016415310.3390/socsci6040153socsci6040153Bending and Fitting: Disciplinarized Institutionalization of Modern Science in China during the ‘Treaty Century’Kai Wang0Department of Philosophy of Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, ChinaThis article investigates how Western science established itself through disciplinarized institutionalization in China as the country entered the modern era, delineating China’s science and technology (S&T) enterprises evolving within the social settings primarily decided by Confucianism doctrines including Scholar-bureaucrat virtue. Although the perspective of this study is mainly historical, I also adopt a sociological approach to scientific knowledge production in order to argue that, the socialization of Western science during the ‘Treaty Century’ (1842–1943) has shaped and channeled the growth of modern S&T as well as its governance in contemporary China in a normative manner. It is this sociological interpretation of the history of modern science in China that sheds new light on our understanding of scientific knowledge as a component element of belief system that crosses countries, social structures, and civilizations. The main findings also include the premises on which the S&T governance issues are explored in China’s case, in particular, the increased social mobility at the intrusion of the Western.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/4/153disciplinarized institutionalizationmodern sciencescholar-bureaucratic virtueutilitarian view |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kai Wang |
spellingShingle |
Kai Wang Bending and Fitting: Disciplinarized Institutionalization of Modern Science in China during the ‘Treaty Century’ Social Sciences disciplinarized institutionalization modern science scholar-bureaucratic virtue utilitarian view |
author_facet |
Kai Wang |
author_sort |
Kai Wang |
title |
Bending and Fitting: Disciplinarized Institutionalization of Modern Science in China during the ‘Treaty Century’ |
title_short |
Bending and Fitting: Disciplinarized Institutionalization of Modern Science in China during the ‘Treaty Century’ |
title_full |
Bending and Fitting: Disciplinarized Institutionalization of Modern Science in China during the ‘Treaty Century’ |
title_fullStr |
Bending and Fitting: Disciplinarized Institutionalization of Modern Science in China during the ‘Treaty Century’ |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bending and Fitting: Disciplinarized Institutionalization of Modern Science in China during the ‘Treaty Century’ |
title_sort |
bending and fitting: disciplinarized institutionalization of modern science in china during the ‘treaty century’ |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Social Sciences |
issn |
2076-0760 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
This article investigates how Western science established itself through disciplinarized institutionalization in China as the country entered the modern era, delineating China’s science and technology (S&T) enterprises evolving within the social settings primarily decided by Confucianism doctrines including Scholar-bureaucrat virtue. Although the perspective of this study is mainly historical, I also adopt a sociological approach to scientific knowledge production in order to argue that, the socialization of Western science during the ‘Treaty Century’ (1842–1943) has shaped and channeled the growth of modern S&T as well as its governance in contemporary China in a normative manner. It is this sociological interpretation of the history of modern science in China that sheds new light on our understanding of scientific knowledge as a component element of belief system that crosses countries, social structures, and civilizations. The main findings also include the premises on which the S&T governance issues are explored in China’s case, in particular, the increased social mobility at the intrusion of the Western. |
topic |
disciplinarized institutionalization modern science scholar-bureaucratic virtue utilitarian view |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/4/153 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kaiwang bendingandfittingdisciplinarizedinstitutionalizationofmodernscienceinchinaduringthetreatycentury |
_version_ |
1724771006329913344 |