Optimisation of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modelling

Airborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) combines cost efficiency, high degree of automation, high point density of typically 1–10 points per m<sup>2</sup> and height accuracy of better than ±15 cm. For all these reasons LiDAR is particularly suitable f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Mandlburger, C. Hauer, B. Höfle, H. Habersack, N. Pfeifer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2009-08-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1453/2009/hess-13-1453-2009.pdf
id doaj-db9a9740085a4e7cb1cca9cdd5c59f6d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-db9a9740085a4e7cb1cca9cdd5c59f6d2020-11-24T21:09:46ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382009-08-0113814531466Optimisation of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modellingG. MandlburgerC. HauerB. HöfleH. HabersackN. PfeiferAirborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) combines cost efficiency, high degree of automation, high point density of typically 1–10 points per m<sup>2</sup> and height accuracy of better than ±15 cm. For all these reasons LiDAR is particularly suitable for deriving precise Digital Terrain Models (DTM) as geometric basis for hydrodynamic-numerical (HN) simulations. The application of LiDAR for river flow modelling requires a series of preprocessing steps. Terrain points have to be filtered and merged with river bed data, e.g. from echo sounding. Then, a smooth Digital Terrain Model of the Watercourse (DTM-W) needs to be derived, preferably considering the random measurement error during surface interpolation. In a subsequent step, a hydraulic computation mesh has to be constructed. Hydraulic simulation software is often restricted to a limited number of nodes and elements, thus, data reduction and data conditioning of the high resolution LiDAR DTM-W becomes necessary. We will present a DTM thinning approach based on adaptive TIN refinement which allows a very effective compression of the point data (more than 95% in flood plains and up to 90% in steep areas) while preserving the most relevant topographic features (height tolerance ±20 cm). Traditional hydraulic mesh generators focus primarily on physical aspects of the computation grid like aspect ratio, expansion ratio and angle criterion. They often neglect the detailed shape of the topography as provided by LiDAR data. In contrast, our approach considers both the high geometric resolution of the LiDAR data and additional mesh quality parameters. It will be shown that the modelling results (flood extents, flow velocities, etc.) can vary remarkably by the availability of surface details. Thus, the inclusion of such geometric details in the hydraulic computation meshes is gaining importance in river flow modelling. http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1453/2009/hess-13-1453-2009.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. Mandlburger
C. Hauer
B. Höfle
H. Habersack
N. Pfeifer
spellingShingle G. Mandlburger
C. Hauer
B. Höfle
H. Habersack
N. Pfeifer
Optimisation of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modelling
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet G. Mandlburger
C. Hauer
B. Höfle
H. Habersack
N. Pfeifer
author_sort G. Mandlburger
title Optimisation of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modelling
title_short Optimisation of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modelling
title_full Optimisation of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modelling
title_fullStr Optimisation of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modelling
title_full_unstemmed Optimisation of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modelling
title_sort optimisation of lidar derived terrain models for river flow modelling
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2009-08-01
description Airborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) combines cost efficiency, high degree of automation, high point density of typically 1–10 points per m<sup>2</sup> and height accuracy of better than ±15 cm. For all these reasons LiDAR is particularly suitable for deriving precise Digital Terrain Models (DTM) as geometric basis for hydrodynamic-numerical (HN) simulations. The application of LiDAR for river flow modelling requires a series of preprocessing steps. Terrain points have to be filtered and merged with river bed data, e.g. from echo sounding. Then, a smooth Digital Terrain Model of the Watercourse (DTM-W) needs to be derived, preferably considering the random measurement error during surface interpolation. In a subsequent step, a hydraulic computation mesh has to be constructed. Hydraulic simulation software is often restricted to a limited number of nodes and elements, thus, data reduction and data conditioning of the high resolution LiDAR DTM-W becomes necessary. We will present a DTM thinning approach based on adaptive TIN refinement which allows a very effective compression of the point data (more than 95% in flood plains and up to 90% in steep areas) while preserving the most relevant topographic features (height tolerance ±20 cm). Traditional hydraulic mesh generators focus primarily on physical aspects of the computation grid like aspect ratio, expansion ratio and angle criterion. They often neglect the detailed shape of the topography as provided by LiDAR data. In contrast, our approach considers both the high geometric resolution of the LiDAR data and additional mesh quality parameters. It will be shown that the modelling results (flood extents, flow velocities, etc.) can vary remarkably by the availability of surface details. Thus, the inclusion of such geometric details in the hydraulic computation meshes is gaining importance in river flow modelling.
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1453/2009/hess-13-1453-2009.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gmandlburger optimisationoflidarderivedterrainmodelsforriverflowmodelling
AT chauer optimisationoflidarderivedterrainmodelsforriverflowmodelling
AT bhofle optimisationoflidarderivedterrainmodelsforriverflowmodelling
AT hhabersack optimisationoflidarderivedterrainmodelsforriverflowmodelling
AT npfeifer optimisationoflidarderivedterrainmodelsforriverflowmodelling
_version_ 1716757381254217728