Independence After Delegation? Presidential Calculus and Political interference in Brazilian regulatory Agencies

Is there Executive interference in the regulatory agencies after its formal establishment as independent bodies? Under what conditions the Executive chooses to interfere in the agencies? This paper analyses the degree of interference in Brazilian national regulatory agencies and provide a tentative...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mariana Batista da Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Brazilian Political Science Association 2011-12-01
Series:Brazilian Political Science Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.bpsr.org.br/index.php/bpsr/article/download/125/116
id doaj-dbb804a655294be08c662c8c74541553
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dbb804a655294be08c662c8c745415532020-11-24T21:53:29ZengBrazilian Political Science AssociationBrazilian Political Science Review1981-38211981-38212011-12-01523974Independence After Delegation? Presidential Calculus and Political interference in Brazilian regulatory AgenciesMariana Batista da Silva0UFPEIs there Executive interference in the regulatory agencies after its formal establishment as independent bodies? Under what conditions the Executive chooses to interfere in the agencies? This paper analyses the degree of interference in Brazilian national regulatory agencies and provide a tentative explanation for the variation in the degree of interference. The basic hypotheses is that credibility costs, the degree of formal independence and the preferences of presidents are crucial factors affecting the extent to which presidents interfere in the regulatory process. A random effects model is estimated with panel data for the period between 1997 and 2008 covering ten national agencies. The degree of interference is operationalized by an index built using factor analysis. The data suggest that there is political interference, which varies across agencies and over time. The results show that the preferences of the president and some issue area specificity matters for the choice that presidents make regarding the interference in the regulatory process. http://www.bpsr.org.br/index.php/bpsr/article/download/125/116Delegationindependenceregulationpolitical interference
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariana Batista da Silva
spellingShingle Mariana Batista da Silva
Independence After Delegation? Presidential Calculus and Political interference in Brazilian regulatory Agencies
Brazilian Political Science Review
Delegation
independence
regulation
political interference
author_facet Mariana Batista da Silva
author_sort Mariana Batista da Silva
title Independence After Delegation? Presidential Calculus and Political interference in Brazilian regulatory Agencies
title_short Independence After Delegation? Presidential Calculus and Political interference in Brazilian regulatory Agencies
title_full Independence After Delegation? Presidential Calculus and Political interference in Brazilian regulatory Agencies
title_fullStr Independence After Delegation? Presidential Calculus and Political interference in Brazilian regulatory Agencies
title_full_unstemmed Independence After Delegation? Presidential Calculus and Political interference in Brazilian regulatory Agencies
title_sort independence after delegation? presidential calculus and political interference in brazilian regulatory agencies
publisher Brazilian Political Science Association
series Brazilian Political Science Review
issn 1981-3821
1981-3821
publishDate 2011-12-01
description Is there Executive interference in the regulatory agencies after its formal establishment as independent bodies? Under what conditions the Executive chooses to interfere in the agencies? This paper analyses the degree of interference in Brazilian national regulatory agencies and provide a tentative explanation for the variation in the degree of interference. The basic hypotheses is that credibility costs, the degree of formal independence and the preferences of presidents are crucial factors affecting the extent to which presidents interfere in the regulatory process. A random effects model is estimated with panel data for the period between 1997 and 2008 covering ten national agencies. The degree of interference is operationalized by an index built using factor analysis. The data suggest that there is political interference, which varies across agencies and over time. The results show that the preferences of the president and some issue area specificity matters for the choice that presidents make regarding the interference in the regulatory process.
topic Delegation
independence
regulation
political interference
url http://www.bpsr.org.br/index.php/bpsr/article/download/125/116
work_keys_str_mv AT marianabatistadasilva independenceafterdelegationpresidentialcalculusandpoliticalinterferenceinbrazilianregulatoryagencies
_version_ 1725871786532274176