Mapping Pigments in a Painting with Low Frequency Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

An electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) mobile universal surface explorer (MOUSE) was recently introduced for noninvasively studying paramagnetic pigments in paintings. This study determined that the EPR MOUSE could map the spatial locations of four pigments in a simple impasto painting. Results fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shane McCarthy, Haley Wiskoski, Joseph P. Hornak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Heritage
Subjects:
EPR
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/4/3/65
id doaj-dbca11e1fb2d42729e38de1153f8ca0f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dbca11e1fb2d42729e38de1153f8ca0f2021-09-26T00:15:41ZengMDPI AGHeritage2571-94082021-07-014651182119210.3390/heritage4030065Mapping Pigments in a Painting with Low Frequency Electron Paramagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyShane McCarthy0Haley Wiskoski1Joseph P. Hornak2RIT Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623-5604, USARIT Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623-5604, USARIT Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623-5604, USAAn electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) mobile universal surface explorer (MOUSE) was recently introduced for noninvasively studying paramagnetic pigments in paintings. This study determined that the EPR MOUSE could map the spatial locations of four pigments in a simple impasto painting. Results from three spectral identification algorithms were examined to assess their ability to identify the pigments using an unsupervised approach. Resulting pigment maps are displayed as colorized images of the spatial distribution of the pigments. All three algorithms produced reasonable representations of the painting. The algorithms achieved excellent true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative rates of ≥0.95, ≥0.98, ≤0.02, and ≤0.05, respectively, for the identification of the pigments. We conclude that the EPR MOUSE is suitable for accurately mapping the location of paramagnetic pigments in a painting.https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/4/3/65low-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopyLFEPREPRmapping pigmentsEPR mobile universal surface explorerEPR MOUSE
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shane McCarthy
Haley Wiskoski
Joseph P. Hornak
spellingShingle Shane McCarthy
Haley Wiskoski
Joseph P. Hornak
Mapping Pigments in a Painting with Low Frequency Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Heritage
low-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy
LFEPR
EPR
mapping pigments
EPR mobile universal surface explorer
EPR MOUSE
author_facet Shane McCarthy
Haley Wiskoski
Joseph P. Hornak
author_sort Shane McCarthy
title Mapping Pigments in a Painting with Low Frequency Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
title_short Mapping Pigments in a Painting with Low Frequency Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
title_full Mapping Pigments in a Painting with Low Frequency Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
title_fullStr Mapping Pigments in a Painting with Low Frequency Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Mapping Pigments in a Painting with Low Frequency Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
title_sort mapping pigments in a painting with low frequency electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy
publisher MDPI AG
series Heritage
issn 2571-9408
publishDate 2021-07-01
description An electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) mobile universal surface explorer (MOUSE) was recently introduced for noninvasively studying paramagnetic pigments in paintings. This study determined that the EPR MOUSE could map the spatial locations of four pigments in a simple impasto painting. Results from three spectral identification algorithms were examined to assess their ability to identify the pigments using an unsupervised approach. Resulting pigment maps are displayed as colorized images of the spatial distribution of the pigments. All three algorithms produced reasonable representations of the painting. The algorithms achieved excellent true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative rates of ≥0.95, ≥0.98, ≤0.02, and ≤0.05, respectively, for the identification of the pigments. We conclude that the EPR MOUSE is suitable for accurately mapping the location of paramagnetic pigments in a painting.
topic low-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy
LFEPR
EPR
mapping pigments
EPR mobile universal surface explorer
EPR MOUSE
url https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/4/3/65
work_keys_str_mv AT shanemccarthy mappingpigmentsinapaintingwithlowfrequencyelectronparamagneticresonancespectroscopy
AT haleywiskoski mappingpigmentsinapaintingwithlowfrequencyelectronparamagneticresonancespectroscopy
AT josephphornak mappingpigmentsinapaintingwithlowfrequencyelectronparamagneticresonancespectroscopy
_version_ 1717366632266858496