Maritime Energy Contracting for Clean Shipping
To reduce the Sulphur emission from shipping and ensure clean shipping, a number of Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECA) were enforced in special areas around the globe. From 2015, in SECA, ship owners are not allowed to use fuel with more than 0.1% Sulphur content. One of the major concerns for th...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Transport and Telecommunication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2018-0004 |
id |
doaj-dbfde5558de2433f80419df639df5b8a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dbfde5558de2433f80419df639df5b8a2021-09-05T21:24:15ZengSciendoTransport and Telecommunication1407-61792018-03-01191314410.2478/ttj-2018-0004ttj-2018-0004Maritime Energy Contracting for Clean ShippingOlaniyi Eunice O.0Atari Sina1Prause Gunnar2Tallinn School of Business & Governance, Tallinn University of Technology University, Tallinn, Estonia, Akadeemia tee 5 19086Tallinn School of Business & Governance, Tallinn University of Technology University, Tallinn, Estonia, Akadeemia tee 5 19086Tallinn School of Business & Governance, Tallinn University of Technology University, Tallinn, Estonia, Akadeemia tee 5 19086To reduce the Sulphur emission from shipping and ensure clean shipping, a number of Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECA) were enforced in special areas around the globe. From 2015, in SECA, ship owners are not allowed to use fuel with more than 0.1% Sulphur content. One of the major concerns for the SECA regulation is that maritime stakeholders have had to take into consideration the costs as well as the tolerable risks of their compliance investment options. Besides that, low freight rates have increased the competition and had caused financial pressure on ship owners so that lower capital reserves and low credibility levels limit the manoeuvring space for investment activities.https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2018-0004investment appraisalvarscrubbersecaenergy contractingbusiness model |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Olaniyi Eunice O. Atari Sina Prause Gunnar |
spellingShingle |
Olaniyi Eunice O. Atari Sina Prause Gunnar Maritime Energy Contracting for Clean Shipping Transport and Telecommunication investment appraisal var scrubber seca energy contracting business model |
author_facet |
Olaniyi Eunice O. Atari Sina Prause Gunnar |
author_sort |
Olaniyi Eunice O. |
title |
Maritime Energy Contracting for Clean Shipping |
title_short |
Maritime Energy Contracting for Clean Shipping |
title_full |
Maritime Energy Contracting for Clean Shipping |
title_fullStr |
Maritime Energy Contracting for Clean Shipping |
title_full_unstemmed |
Maritime Energy Contracting for Clean Shipping |
title_sort |
maritime energy contracting for clean shipping |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Transport and Telecommunication |
issn |
1407-6179 |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
To reduce the Sulphur emission from shipping and ensure clean shipping, a number of Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECA) were enforced in special areas around the globe. From 2015, in SECA, ship owners are not allowed to use fuel with more than 0.1% Sulphur content. One of the major concerns for the SECA regulation is that maritime stakeholders have had to take into consideration the costs as well as the tolerable risks of their compliance investment options. Besides that, low freight rates have increased the competition and had caused financial pressure on ship owners so that lower capital reserves and low credibility levels limit the manoeuvring space for investment activities. |
topic |
investment appraisal var scrubber seca energy contracting business model |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2018-0004 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olaniyieuniceo maritimeenergycontractingforcleanshipping AT atarisina maritimeenergycontractingforcleanshipping AT prausegunnar maritimeenergycontractingforcleanshipping |
_version_ |
1717780641051836416 |