A Response to Michael Spitzer's Commentary
The authors respond to the commentary by Michael Spitzer which appeared in Vol. 14, No. 1-2 of Empirical Musicology Review. The response 1) points out the problem with equating nostalgia and tension in the perception of single chords, 2) makes a case for why studying the role of vertical harmony, is...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Ohio State University Libraries
2020-10-01
|
| Series: | Empirical Musicology Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://emusicology.org/article/view/7324 |
| id |
doaj-dc084920c0474ee18975a19f8da8b3d2 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-dc084920c0474ee18975a19f8da8b3d22020-11-25T04:01:39ZengThe Ohio State University LibrariesEmpirical Musicology Review1559-57492020-10-01151-214114410.18061/emr.v15i1-2.73244666A Response to Michael Spitzer's CommentaryImre Lahdelma0Tuomas Eerola1Department of Music, Durham UniversityDepartment of Music, Durham UniversityThe authors respond to the commentary by Michael Spitzer which appeared in Vol. 14, No. 1-2 of Empirical Musicology Review. The response 1) points out the problem with equating nostalgia and tension in the perception of single chords, 2) makes a case for why studying the role of vertical harmony, isolated from other musical cues, is insightful, and 3) questions the relevance of appoggiaturas as an explanation for the perception of nostalgia in single chords.https://emusicology.org/article/view/7324nostalgiapsychologyanalysischordvertical harmonyontology |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Imre Lahdelma Tuomas Eerola |
| spellingShingle |
Imre Lahdelma Tuomas Eerola A Response to Michael Spitzer's Commentary Empirical Musicology Review nostalgia psychology analysis chord vertical harmony ontology |
| author_facet |
Imre Lahdelma Tuomas Eerola |
| author_sort |
Imre Lahdelma |
| title |
A Response to Michael Spitzer's Commentary |
| title_short |
A Response to Michael Spitzer's Commentary |
| title_full |
A Response to Michael Spitzer's Commentary |
| title_fullStr |
A Response to Michael Spitzer's Commentary |
| title_full_unstemmed |
A Response to Michael Spitzer's Commentary |
| title_sort |
response to michael spitzer's commentary |
| publisher |
The Ohio State University Libraries |
| series |
Empirical Musicology Review |
| issn |
1559-5749 |
| publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
| description |
The authors respond to the commentary by Michael Spitzer which appeared in Vol. 14, No. 1-2 of Empirical Musicology Review. The response 1) points out the problem with equating nostalgia and tension in the perception of single chords, 2) makes a case for why studying the role of vertical harmony, isolated from other musical cues, is insightful, and 3) questions the relevance of appoggiaturas as an explanation for the perception of nostalgia in single chords. |
| topic |
nostalgia psychology analysis chord vertical harmony ontology |
| url |
https://emusicology.org/article/view/7324 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT imrelahdelma aresponsetomichaelspitzerscommentary AT tuomaseerola aresponsetomichaelspitzerscommentary AT imrelahdelma responsetomichaelspitzerscommentary AT tuomaseerola responsetomichaelspitzerscommentary |
| _version_ |
1724445977209733120 |