Mathematical Modelling Of The Bridges Structural Monitoring II

We have seen in the previous paper that in the case of resistance elements made of steel, at least in this case study, the structure’s response to strains, in this case sunshine, is uncertain, may or may not be linear. The analysis continues for the four characteristic months of 2013, respectively t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rădulescu G.M.T., Rădulescu A.T.G., Rădulescu M.V.G., Naş Sanda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2015-05-01
Series:Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jaes-2015-0012
id doaj-dc122ab8c90c418cad8dfe6e6e84f2f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dc122ab8c90c418cad8dfe6e6e84f2f22021-09-06T19:40:24ZengSciendoJournal of Applied Engineering Sciences2247-37692284-71972015-05-01519110010.1515/jaes-2015-0012Mathematical Modelling Of The Bridges Structural Monitoring IIRădulescu G.M.T.0Rădulescu A.T.G.1Rădulescu M.V.G.2Naş Sanda3Technical University of Cluj Napoca, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Terrestrial Measurement and Cadastre, 25 G. Baritiu St., 400027 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaTechnical University of Cluj Napoca, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Terrestrial Measurement and Cadastre, 25 G. Baritiu St., 400027 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaTechnical University of Cluj Napoca, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Terrestrial Measurement and Cadastre, 25 G. Baritiu St., 400027 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaTechnical University of Cluj Napoca, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Terrestrial Measurement and Cadastre, 25 G. Baritiu St., 400027 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaWe have seen in the previous paper that in the case of resistance elements made of steel, at least in this case study, the structure’s response to strains, in this case sunshine, is uncertain, may or may not be linear. The analysis continues for the four characteristic months of 2013, respectively the second month (February), the fifth (May), the eighth (August) and the event (November), covering the four seasons and approximately the entire range of temperatures to which the resistance elements of the bridge are subject to along a calendar year - case study Incheon Grand Bridge, Seoul, South Korea. The number of data pairs recorded, as we have noted, every 15 minutes, is initially 11,616, being difficult to process. Some software (e.g. Table Curve 2D) can work with a maximum of 3000 data pairs. In what follows we will examine the behaviour of a reinforced concrete element of the North Bridge Gap front line and we will build a mathematical model of its behaviour to sunshine, from the input data, one recording every hours, thus reducing the number of measurements to 2904. The aim is to obtain a mathematical model with a correlation coefficient above 0.9, which is also verified and validated. This model will allow us to calculate the expected position of the sensor mounted on the resistance element for a certain temperature, the degree of confidence of the result, the interval of residual values. Because the history of the evolution of temperatures for each moment analyzed is different it produces different results, but ones that fit the specified regressive mathematical model.https://doi.org/10.1515/jaes-2015-0012incheon grand bridgestructural health monitoringmathematical modelsensorssteel structural element
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rădulescu G.M.T.
Rădulescu A.T.G.
Rădulescu M.V.G.
Naş Sanda
spellingShingle Rădulescu G.M.T.
Rădulescu A.T.G.
Rădulescu M.V.G.
Naş Sanda
Mathematical Modelling Of The Bridges Structural Monitoring II
Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences
incheon grand bridge
structural health monitoring
mathematical model
sensors
steel structural element
author_facet Rădulescu G.M.T.
Rădulescu A.T.G.
Rădulescu M.V.G.
Naş Sanda
author_sort Rădulescu G.M.T.
title Mathematical Modelling Of The Bridges Structural Monitoring II
title_short Mathematical Modelling Of The Bridges Structural Monitoring II
title_full Mathematical Modelling Of The Bridges Structural Monitoring II
title_fullStr Mathematical Modelling Of The Bridges Structural Monitoring II
title_full_unstemmed Mathematical Modelling Of The Bridges Structural Monitoring II
title_sort mathematical modelling of the bridges structural monitoring ii
publisher Sciendo
series Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences
issn 2247-3769
2284-7197
publishDate 2015-05-01
description We have seen in the previous paper that in the case of resistance elements made of steel, at least in this case study, the structure’s response to strains, in this case sunshine, is uncertain, may or may not be linear. The analysis continues for the four characteristic months of 2013, respectively the second month (February), the fifth (May), the eighth (August) and the event (November), covering the four seasons and approximately the entire range of temperatures to which the resistance elements of the bridge are subject to along a calendar year - case study Incheon Grand Bridge, Seoul, South Korea. The number of data pairs recorded, as we have noted, every 15 minutes, is initially 11,616, being difficult to process. Some software (e.g. Table Curve 2D) can work with a maximum of 3000 data pairs. In what follows we will examine the behaviour of a reinforced concrete element of the North Bridge Gap front line and we will build a mathematical model of its behaviour to sunshine, from the input data, one recording every hours, thus reducing the number of measurements to 2904. The aim is to obtain a mathematical model with a correlation coefficient above 0.9, which is also verified and validated. This model will allow us to calculate the expected position of the sensor mounted on the resistance element for a certain temperature, the degree of confidence of the result, the interval of residual values. Because the history of the evolution of temperatures for each moment analyzed is different it produces different results, but ones that fit the specified regressive mathematical model.
topic incheon grand bridge
structural health monitoring
mathematical model
sensors
steel structural element
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jaes-2015-0012
work_keys_str_mv AT radulescugmt mathematicalmodellingofthebridgesstructuralmonitoringii
AT radulescuatg mathematicalmodellingofthebridgesstructuralmonitoringii
AT radulescumvg mathematicalmodellingofthebridgesstructuralmonitoringii
AT nassanda mathematicalmodellingofthebridgesstructuralmonitoringii
_version_ 1717768628500168704