Efficacy of elastodontic devices in overjet and overbite reduction assessed by computer-aid evaluation

Abstract Background This study aimed to verify the efficacy of two elastodontic devices in overjet (OJ) and overbite (OB) reduction during treatment with the Equilibrator Series II (Eptamed) and Occlus-o-Guide (Sweden & Martina) devices. Method Sixty patients aged 7–15 years were enrolled in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eleonora Ortu, Davide Pietropaoli, Samuele Cova, Maria Chiara Marci, Annalisa Monaco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01628-7
id doaj-dc25349c2c3e43bd956b25b8e7ad17d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dc25349c2c3e43bd956b25b8e7ad17d22021-05-23T11:41:06ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312021-05-012111410.1186/s12903-021-01628-7Efficacy of elastodontic devices in overjet and overbite reduction assessed by computer-aid evaluationEleonora Ortu0Davide Pietropaoli1Samuele Cova2Maria Chiara Marci3Annalisa Monaco4MeSVA Department, Dental Unit, University of L’AquilaMeSVA Department, Dental Unit, University of L’AquilaCova Samuele, DDS, FreelanceMeSVA Department, Dental Unit, University of L’AquilaMeSVA Department, Dental Unit, University of L’AquilaAbstract Background This study aimed to verify the efficacy of two elastodontic devices in overjet (OJ) and overbite (OB) reduction during treatment with the Equilibrator Series II (Eptamed) and Occlus-o-Guide (Sweden & Martina) devices. Method Sixty patients aged 7–15 years were enrolled in the study, and were divided into test and control groups. The test group included 30 patients (14 males, 16 females; mean age, 10.66 ± 2.12 years) treated with the EQ (Equilibrator) Series II. The control group included 30 patients (15 males, 15 females; mean age, 10.76 ± 2.52 years) treated with the Occlus-o-Guide. The two groups exhibited the same orthodontic features. The orthodontic criteria were: skeletal and dental class II malocclusion (divisions 1 and 2); and the presence of OJ and OB. Evaluation of OJ and OB was performed at two timepoints: T0 (before starting therapy) and T1 (after 1 year). Results At T0, OJ and OB were similar for the two groups; however, at T1, both OJ and OB were significantly lower with the Eptamed device compared to the Occlus-o-Guide device (p = 0.0019). Conclusions Elastodontic devices improve orthodontic outcomes by aiding orthodontic patient management, diagnosis, and treatment planning, reducing the risk relapse acting on the whole organism and the rehabilitation of the tongue.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01628-7OrthodonticElastodontic deviceOverjetOverbiteMalocclusion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eleonora Ortu
Davide Pietropaoli
Samuele Cova
Maria Chiara Marci
Annalisa Monaco
spellingShingle Eleonora Ortu
Davide Pietropaoli
Samuele Cova
Maria Chiara Marci
Annalisa Monaco
Efficacy of elastodontic devices in overjet and overbite reduction assessed by computer-aid evaluation
BMC Oral Health
Orthodontic
Elastodontic device
Overjet
Overbite
Malocclusion
author_facet Eleonora Ortu
Davide Pietropaoli
Samuele Cova
Maria Chiara Marci
Annalisa Monaco
author_sort Eleonora Ortu
title Efficacy of elastodontic devices in overjet and overbite reduction assessed by computer-aid evaluation
title_short Efficacy of elastodontic devices in overjet and overbite reduction assessed by computer-aid evaluation
title_full Efficacy of elastodontic devices in overjet and overbite reduction assessed by computer-aid evaluation
title_fullStr Efficacy of elastodontic devices in overjet and overbite reduction assessed by computer-aid evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of elastodontic devices in overjet and overbite reduction assessed by computer-aid evaluation
title_sort efficacy of elastodontic devices in overjet and overbite reduction assessed by computer-aid evaluation
publisher BMC
series BMC Oral Health
issn 1472-6831
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background This study aimed to verify the efficacy of two elastodontic devices in overjet (OJ) and overbite (OB) reduction during treatment with the Equilibrator Series II (Eptamed) and Occlus-o-Guide (Sweden & Martina) devices. Method Sixty patients aged 7–15 years were enrolled in the study, and were divided into test and control groups. The test group included 30 patients (14 males, 16 females; mean age, 10.66 ± 2.12 years) treated with the EQ (Equilibrator) Series II. The control group included 30 patients (15 males, 15 females; mean age, 10.76 ± 2.52 years) treated with the Occlus-o-Guide. The two groups exhibited the same orthodontic features. The orthodontic criteria were: skeletal and dental class II malocclusion (divisions 1 and 2); and the presence of OJ and OB. Evaluation of OJ and OB was performed at two timepoints: T0 (before starting therapy) and T1 (after 1 year). Results At T0, OJ and OB were similar for the two groups; however, at T1, both OJ and OB were significantly lower with the Eptamed device compared to the Occlus-o-Guide device (p = 0.0019). Conclusions Elastodontic devices improve orthodontic outcomes by aiding orthodontic patient management, diagnosis, and treatment planning, reducing the risk relapse acting on the whole organism and the rehabilitation of the tongue.
topic Orthodontic
Elastodontic device
Overjet
Overbite
Malocclusion
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01628-7
work_keys_str_mv AT eleonoraortu efficacyofelastodonticdevicesinoverjetandoverbitereductionassessedbycomputeraidevaluation
AT davidepietropaoli efficacyofelastodonticdevicesinoverjetandoverbitereductionassessedbycomputeraidevaluation
AT samuelecova efficacyofelastodonticdevicesinoverjetandoverbitereductionassessedbycomputeraidevaluation
AT mariachiaramarci efficacyofelastodonticdevicesinoverjetandoverbitereductionassessedbycomputeraidevaluation
AT annalisamonaco efficacyofelastodonticdevicesinoverjetandoverbitereductionassessedbycomputeraidevaluation
_version_ 1721429518012383232