Palaeo-philosophy: Complex and Concept in Archaic Patterns of Thought

This paper argues that efforts to understand historically remote patterns of thought are driven away from their original meaning if the investigation focuses on reconstruction of concepts. It is simply not appropriate to be looking for an archaic concept of soul, name or dream, for example, when con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paul S. MacDonald
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cosmos and History Publishing Co-op. 2006-01-01
Series:Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/14
id doaj-dc3f1d7fe9204db09f61100382e0c976
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dc3f1d7fe9204db09f61100382e0c9762020-11-25T01:06:45ZengCosmos and History Publishing Co-op.Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy1832-91012006-01-0112222244Palaeo-philosophy: Complex and Concept in Archaic Patterns of ThoughtPaul S. MacDonaldThis paper argues that efforts to understand historically remote patterns of thought are driven away from their original meaning if the investigation focuses on reconstruction of concepts. It is simply not appropriate to be looking for an archaic concept of soul, name or dream, for example, when considering the earliest documents which attest to their writers’ (and others’) beliefs about certain types of phenomena. Instead, we propose to employ the notion of cognitive complex (as elaborated in the work of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Hallpike) in order to investigate some important philosophical themes in Ancient Egyptian, Ancient Iranian, and Ancient Near Eastern documents. Our principal theoretical claim is that archaic thought does not work with concepts but with complexes whose salient features are an over-abundance of properties, an over-production of connections, and weakness in abstraction. The basic level of complex formation may be the most inclusive level at which it is possible to form a mental image. Specific studies are focused on ancient texts which exhibit archaic patterns of thought. In Egyptian texts, “manifestation” (kheperu) seems to convey something which all categories of beings are capable of becoming, being and having, assuming and leaving; the “name” (ren) was considered to be an essential component of the individual’s survival; symbolic representations, such as images and words, are causally connected to the ‘objects’ the image or word signifies. In ANE records the human etemmu was plainly the corpse or skeleton of the dead person; on the other hand it was also the shadowy, volatile image of what he was during life. In ANE records the baffling idea of the divine me referred to an entire cultural area, an acquisition of civilized life; but at the same time it is also the result of an invention, a divine decision. The complexes involved in these archaic ideas about soul, name and dream are ideas fused with their ‘objects’; they have unstable traits and prototypical instances; and are thought at the most abstract level which have concrete images. http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/14ConceptComplexArchaic IdeasArchaic ImagesVygotskyHallpike
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul S. MacDonald
spellingShingle Paul S. MacDonald
Palaeo-philosophy: Complex and Concept in Archaic Patterns of Thought
Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy
Concept
Complex
Archaic Ideas
Archaic Images
Vygotsky
Hallpike
author_facet Paul S. MacDonald
author_sort Paul S. MacDonald
title Palaeo-philosophy: Complex and Concept in Archaic Patterns of Thought
title_short Palaeo-philosophy: Complex and Concept in Archaic Patterns of Thought
title_full Palaeo-philosophy: Complex and Concept in Archaic Patterns of Thought
title_fullStr Palaeo-philosophy: Complex and Concept in Archaic Patterns of Thought
title_full_unstemmed Palaeo-philosophy: Complex and Concept in Archaic Patterns of Thought
title_sort palaeo-philosophy: complex and concept in archaic patterns of thought
publisher Cosmos and History Publishing Co-op.
series Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy
issn 1832-9101
publishDate 2006-01-01
description This paper argues that efforts to understand historically remote patterns of thought are driven away from their original meaning if the investigation focuses on reconstruction of concepts. It is simply not appropriate to be looking for an archaic concept of soul, name or dream, for example, when considering the earliest documents which attest to their writers’ (and others’) beliefs about certain types of phenomena. Instead, we propose to employ the notion of cognitive complex (as elaborated in the work of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Hallpike) in order to investigate some important philosophical themes in Ancient Egyptian, Ancient Iranian, and Ancient Near Eastern documents. Our principal theoretical claim is that archaic thought does not work with concepts but with complexes whose salient features are an over-abundance of properties, an over-production of connections, and weakness in abstraction. The basic level of complex formation may be the most inclusive level at which it is possible to form a mental image. Specific studies are focused on ancient texts which exhibit archaic patterns of thought. In Egyptian texts, “manifestation” (kheperu) seems to convey something which all categories of beings are capable of becoming, being and having, assuming and leaving; the “name” (ren) was considered to be an essential component of the individual’s survival; symbolic representations, such as images and words, are causally connected to the ‘objects’ the image or word signifies. In ANE records the human etemmu was plainly the corpse or skeleton of the dead person; on the other hand it was also the shadowy, volatile image of what he was during life. In ANE records the baffling idea of the divine me referred to an entire cultural area, an acquisition of civilized life; but at the same time it is also the result of an invention, a divine decision. The complexes involved in these archaic ideas about soul, name and dream are ideas fused with their ‘objects’; they have unstable traits and prototypical instances; and are thought at the most abstract level which have concrete images.
topic Concept
Complex
Archaic Ideas
Archaic Images
Vygotsky
Hallpike
url http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/14
work_keys_str_mv AT paulsmacdonald palaeophilosophycomplexandconceptinarchaicpatternsofthought
_version_ 1725188384760004608