An assessment of zoological research collections in South Africa

Natural science collections are accepted globally as critical research assets. A total of 71 zoological collections in South Africa, consisting of over 15 million specimens housed at 22 institutions, were assessed to determine their current status and to make recommendations for their future securi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michelle Hamer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academy of Science of South Africa 2012-10-01
Series:South African Journal of Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sajs.co.za/article/view/9769
id doaj-dc441056fabe48f78197e0600d77f19a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dc441056fabe48f78197e0600d77f19a2021-02-27T06:03:02ZengAcademy of Science of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Science1996-74892012-10-0110811/12An assessment of zoological research collections in South AfricaMichelle Hamer0Biosystematics Division, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria School of Biological & Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg Natural science collections are accepted globally as critical research assets. A total of 71 zoological collections in South Africa, consisting of over 15 million specimens housed at 22 institutions, were assessed to determine their current status and to make recommendations for their future security. The two greatest challenges to the sustainability of the collections are (1) that natural science museums report to departments with an arts and culture rather than a science mandate and (2) staffing. The total staff complement within these 22 institutions is 115, with many collections understaffed or not staffed, and the loss of a single staff member often leaves a collection neglected and unused. Consolidation of collections so that there is a critical mass of staff is essential to address understaffing and would also allow for the establishment of a more dynamic research and curation environment. Consolidation under an appropriate department would also enable concentration of resources rather than dilution across all institutions, which would improve the storage environment (currently 28% of collections have reliable temperature control and only 8% (five collections) have humidity control), and increase the efficiency of the use of available funds (the curation budget was R1.08 million in 2009/2010 for all 71 collections). Consolidation could also ensure the improvement of data storage, management and dissemination, thereby increasing accessibility to the collections and the use of the collections for research. https://www.sajs.co.za/article/view/9769biodiversitytaxonomydatabasescurationnatural history
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michelle Hamer
spellingShingle Michelle Hamer
An assessment of zoological research collections in South Africa
South African Journal of Science
biodiversity
taxonomy
databases
curation
natural history
author_facet Michelle Hamer
author_sort Michelle Hamer
title An assessment of zoological research collections in South Africa
title_short An assessment of zoological research collections in South Africa
title_full An assessment of zoological research collections in South Africa
title_fullStr An assessment of zoological research collections in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of zoological research collections in South Africa
title_sort assessment of zoological research collections in south africa
publisher Academy of Science of South Africa
series South African Journal of Science
issn 1996-7489
publishDate 2012-10-01
description Natural science collections are accepted globally as critical research assets. A total of 71 zoological collections in South Africa, consisting of over 15 million specimens housed at 22 institutions, were assessed to determine their current status and to make recommendations for their future security. The two greatest challenges to the sustainability of the collections are (1) that natural science museums report to departments with an arts and culture rather than a science mandate and (2) staffing. The total staff complement within these 22 institutions is 115, with many collections understaffed or not staffed, and the loss of a single staff member often leaves a collection neglected and unused. Consolidation of collections so that there is a critical mass of staff is essential to address understaffing and would also allow for the establishment of a more dynamic research and curation environment. Consolidation under an appropriate department would also enable concentration of resources rather than dilution across all institutions, which would improve the storage environment (currently 28% of collections have reliable temperature control and only 8% (five collections) have humidity control), and increase the efficiency of the use of available funds (the curation budget was R1.08 million in 2009/2010 for all 71 collections). Consolidation could also ensure the improvement of data storage, management and dissemination, thereby increasing accessibility to the collections and the use of the collections for research.
topic biodiversity
taxonomy
databases
curation
natural history
url https://www.sajs.co.za/article/view/9769
work_keys_str_mv AT michellehamer anassessmentofzoologicalresearchcollectionsinsouthafrica
AT michellehamer assessmentofzoologicalresearchcollectionsinsouthafrica
_version_ 1724248317087449088