The Implications of Uncertainty in the Law of Criminal Causation for the One-Punch Homicide Offence in Western Australia

This article considers s 281 of the Criminal Code (WA), which was introduced in 2008 to create an offence ofunlawful assault causing death and to exclude the defence of accident (and the test of reasonableforeseeability) in those cases. The author argues that, given the ‘unfixed’ state of the common...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jennifer Porter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University
Series:Bond Law Review
Online Access:http://blr.scholasticahq.com/article/5632-the-implications-of-uncertainty-in-the-law-of-criminal-causation-for-the-one-punch-homicide-offence-in-western-australia.pdf
id doaj-dc7b1816826a4d44bcbfadba9d085009
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dc7b1816826a4d44bcbfadba9d0850092020-11-25T00:29:47ZengBond UniversityBond Law Review2202-4824The Implications of Uncertainty in the Law of Criminal Causation for the One-Punch Homicide Offence in Western AustraliaJennifer PorterThis article considers s 281 of the Criminal Code (WA), which was introduced in 2008 to create an offence ofunlawful assault causing death and to exclude the defence of accident (and the test of reasonableforeseeability) in those cases. The author argues that, given the ‘unfixed’ state of the common law of criminalcausation in Australia, triers of fact may still consider the reasonable foreseeability of consequences indeciding the primary question of causation. If triers of fact may still have regard to the reasonableforeseeability of consequences in deciding causation as a separate issue, then s 281 might not achieve what it isintended to achieve. An accused might be acquitted of a charge of unlawful assault causing death on the basisthat the death was not reasonably foreseeable even before the defence of accident arises. While this argumentremains open, s 281 may be a vehicle for further appellate consideration of the law of criminal causation andthe relationship of (legal) causation with accident in code jurisdictions.http://blr.scholasticahq.com/article/5632-the-implications-of-uncertainty-in-the-law-of-criminal-causation-for-the-one-punch-homicide-offence-in-western-australia.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jennifer Porter
spellingShingle Jennifer Porter
The Implications of Uncertainty in the Law of Criminal Causation for the One-Punch Homicide Offence in Western Australia
Bond Law Review
author_facet Jennifer Porter
author_sort Jennifer Porter
title The Implications of Uncertainty in the Law of Criminal Causation for the One-Punch Homicide Offence in Western Australia
title_short The Implications of Uncertainty in the Law of Criminal Causation for the One-Punch Homicide Offence in Western Australia
title_full The Implications of Uncertainty in the Law of Criminal Causation for the One-Punch Homicide Offence in Western Australia
title_fullStr The Implications of Uncertainty in the Law of Criminal Causation for the One-Punch Homicide Offence in Western Australia
title_full_unstemmed The Implications of Uncertainty in the Law of Criminal Causation for the One-Punch Homicide Offence in Western Australia
title_sort implications of uncertainty in the law of criminal causation for the one-punch homicide offence in western australia
publisher Bond University
series Bond Law Review
issn 2202-4824
description This article considers s 281 of the Criminal Code (WA), which was introduced in 2008 to create an offence ofunlawful assault causing death and to exclude the defence of accident (and the test of reasonableforeseeability) in those cases. The author argues that, given the ‘unfixed’ state of the common law of criminalcausation in Australia, triers of fact may still consider the reasonable foreseeability of consequences indeciding the primary question of causation. If triers of fact may still have regard to the reasonableforeseeability of consequences in deciding causation as a separate issue, then s 281 might not achieve what it isintended to achieve. An accused might be acquitted of a charge of unlawful assault causing death on the basisthat the death was not reasonably foreseeable even before the defence of accident arises. While this argumentremains open, s 281 may be a vehicle for further appellate consideration of the law of criminal causation andthe relationship of (legal) causation with accident in code jurisdictions.
url http://blr.scholasticahq.com/article/5632-the-implications-of-uncertainty-in-the-law-of-criminal-causation-for-the-one-punch-homicide-offence-in-western-australia.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferporter theimplicationsofuncertaintyinthelawofcriminalcausationfortheonepunchhomicideoffenceinwesternaustralia
AT jenniferporter implicationsofuncertaintyinthelawofcriminalcausationfortheonepunchhomicideoffenceinwesternaustralia
_version_ 1725329914249347072