Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Hubungannya dengan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut KUHP; Perspektif Teori Maqâṣid Sharî’ah

Human rights are often echoed by various parties are sometimes opposed to each other. Many journalists who exercised the right to freedom of expression expressed the opinion that the right has been protected by the 1945 Constitution article 28 E (3), precisely resulting in a criminal offense of defa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moh. Faizur Rohman
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Institut Agama Islam Bani Fattah Jombang 2017-11-01
Series:Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Keislaman
Subjects:
HAM
Online Access:http://jurnal.iaibafa.ac.id/index.php/tafaqquh/article/view/81
id doaj-dcd0168275744fb488900dca7e187d62
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dcd0168275744fb488900dca7e187d622020-11-24T23:00:05ZaraInstitut Agama Islam Bani Fattah JombangTafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Keislaman2338-31862549-18732017-11-0152497281Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Hubungannya dengan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut KUHP; Perspektif Teori Maqâṣid Sharî’ahMoh. Faizur Rohman0Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, SurabayaHuman rights are often echoed by various parties are sometimes opposed to each other. Many journalists who exercised the right to freedom of expression expressed the opinion that the right has been protected by the 1945 Constitution article 28 E (3), precisely resulting in a criminal offense of defamation for those who do not like it. Defamation articles in the Criminal Code are often regarded as a powerful weapon against a criticism as a form of antipathy against criticism. Therefore, there should be efforts to classify the forms of the use of rights and forms of criminal acts. and will be seen from the standpoint of maqâṣid sharî’ah. Through approach statue approach, and case approach, obtained that the law has protected the rights of everyone in expressing opinions. Every person shall have the right and freedom to express opinions but such rights shall not infringe the rights of others. In maqâṣid is guaranteed and protected self-esteem, the soul for every human being is contained in the principle of ḥifḍu al-nafs wa al-‘ird. Therefore, in every opinion, communicate and socialize should pay attention to the rights of others is the dignity of one's dignity to create a balanced and harmonious life.http://jurnal.iaibafa.ac.id/index.php/tafaqquh/article/view/81HAMDefamationKUHPFreedom OpinionMaqâṣid Sharî’ah
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Moh. Faizur Rohman
spellingShingle Moh. Faizur Rohman
Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Hubungannya dengan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut KUHP; Perspektif Teori Maqâṣid Sharî’ah
Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Keislaman
HAM
Defamation
KUHP
Freedom Opinion
Maqâṣid Sharî’ah
author_facet Moh. Faizur Rohman
author_sort Moh. Faizur Rohman
title Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Hubungannya dengan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut KUHP; Perspektif Teori Maqâṣid Sharî’ah
title_short Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Hubungannya dengan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut KUHP; Perspektif Teori Maqâṣid Sharî’ah
title_full Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Hubungannya dengan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut KUHP; Perspektif Teori Maqâṣid Sharî’ah
title_fullStr Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Hubungannya dengan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut KUHP; Perspektif Teori Maqâṣid Sharî’ah
title_full_unstemmed Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Hubungannya dengan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut KUHP; Perspektif Teori Maqâṣid Sharî’ah
title_sort hak kebebasan berpendapat dalam hubungannya dengan pencemaran nama baik menurut kuhp; perspektif teori maqâṣid sharî’ah
publisher Institut Agama Islam Bani Fattah Jombang
series Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Keislaman
issn 2338-3186
2549-1873
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Human rights are often echoed by various parties are sometimes opposed to each other. Many journalists who exercised the right to freedom of expression expressed the opinion that the right has been protected by the 1945 Constitution article 28 E (3), precisely resulting in a criminal offense of defamation for those who do not like it. Defamation articles in the Criminal Code are often regarded as a powerful weapon against a criticism as a form of antipathy against criticism. Therefore, there should be efforts to classify the forms of the use of rights and forms of criminal acts. and will be seen from the standpoint of maqâṣid sharî’ah. Through approach statue approach, and case approach, obtained that the law has protected the rights of everyone in expressing opinions. Every person shall have the right and freedom to express opinions but such rights shall not infringe the rights of others. In maqâṣid is guaranteed and protected self-esteem, the soul for every human being is contained in the principle of ḥifḍu al-nafs wa al-‘ird. Therefore, in every opinion, communicate and socialize should pay attention to the rights of others is the dignity of one's dignity to create a balanced and harmonious life.
topic HAM
Defamation
KUHP
Freedom Opinion
Maqâṣid Sharî’ah
url http://jurnal.iaibafa.ac.id/index.php/tafaqquh/article/view/81
work_keys_str_mv AT mohfaizurrohman hakkebebasanberpendapatdalamhubungannyadenganpencemarannamabaikmenurutkuhpperspektifteorimaqasidshariah
_version_ 1725642736700227584