Negative externalities of food production: discourses on the contested Norwegian aquaculture industry

The concern of this article is the language and ontology of negative externalities. Four discourses on the financially successful industry of salmon farming in Norway are critically analyzed and deconstructed. The discourses are: "high turnover discourse", "technology optimism discour...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Erling A. N. Christiansen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Arizona Libraries 2013-12-01
Series:Journal of Political Ecology
Online Access:https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/21747
id doaj-dcdf76883eaa4d539f1e7854370b64cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dcdf76883eaa4d539f1e7854370b64cc2020-11-25T00:12:42ZengUniversity of Arizona LibrariesJournal of Political Ecology1073-04512013-12-0120118019810.2458/v20i1.2174721140Negative externalities of food production: discourses on the contested Norwegian aquaculture industryErling A. N. Christiansen0University of Oslo, NorwayThe concern of this article is the language and ontology of negative externalities. Four discourses on the financially successful industry of salmon farming in Norway are critically analyzed and deconstructed. The discourses are: "high turnover discourse", "technology optimism discourse", "first nature discourse" and "traditionalist discourse". Groups defending various discourses differ in their interpretations of a) human/nature relations i.e. either ecocentric, anthropocentric or biocentric, and b) in their respective approach to either a transformative, adaptive or reactive logic. By linking interpretations, concepts and logic inherent to these discourses, it is possible to make conclusions on their degree of coherency. The leading discourses are maintained in language through strategic framing and overdetermination. These linguistic mechanisms are revealed in the discursive application of the concepts of sustainability and wild fish.  Rather than to surrender to relativism, the article recommends integration of realism and deconstruction. Key words: Atlantic salmon farming, food production, critical discourse analysis, negative externalities, soft constructionism, parsimony, political ecology, sustainability.https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/21747
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erling A. N. Christiansen
spellingShingle Erling A. N. Christiansen
Negative externalities of food production: discourses on the contested Norwegian aquaculture industry
Journal of Political Ecology
author_facet Erling A. N. Christiansen
author_sort Erling A. N. Christiansen
title Negative externalities of food production: discourses on the contested Norwegian aquaculture industry
title_short Negative externalities of food production: discourses on the contested Norwegian aquaculture industry
title_full Negative externalities of food production: discourses on the contested Norwegian aquaculture industry
title_fullStr Negative externalities of food production: discourses on the contested Norwegian aquaculture industry
title_full_unstemmed Negative externalities of food production: discourses on the contested Norwegian aquaculture industry
title_sort negative externalities of food production: discourses on the contested norwegian aquaculture industry
publisher University of Arizona Libraries
series Journal of Political Ecology
issn 1073-0451
publishDate 2013-12-01
description The concern of this article is the language and ontology of negative externalities. Four discourses on the financially successful industry of salmon farming in Norway are critically analyzed and deconstructed. The discourses are: "high turnover discourse", "technology optimism discourse", "first nature discourse" and "traditionalist discourse". Groups defending various discourses differ in their interpretations of a) human/nature relations i.e. either ecocentric, anthropocentric or biocentric, and b) in their respective approach to either a transformative, adaptive or reactive logic. By linking interpretations, concepts and logic inherent to these discourses, it is possible to make conclusions on their degree of coherency. The leading discourses are maintained in language through strategic framing and overdetermination. These linguistic mechanisms are revealed in the discursive application of the concepts of sustainability and wild fish.  Rather than to surrender to relativism, the article recommends integration of realism and deconstruction. Key words: Atlantic salmon farming, food production, critical discourse analysis, negative externalities, soft constructionism, parsimony, political ecology, sustainability.
url https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/21747
work_keys_str_mv AT erlinganchristiansen negativeexternalitiesoffoodproductiondiscoursesonthecontestednorwegianaquacultureindustry
_version_ 1725397991165001728