Manual restrictions on Palaeolithic technological behaviours

The causes of technological innovation in the Palaeolithic archaeological record are central to understanding Plio-Pleistocene hominin behaviour and temporal trends in artefact variation. Palaeolithic archaeologists frequently investigate the Oldowan-Acheulean transition and technological developmen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alastair J.M. Key, Christopher J. Dunmore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2018-08-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/5399.pdf
id doaj-dce7c8d6027e4820bb489e8814794932
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dce7c8d6027e4820bb489e88147949322020-11-24T23:10:21ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592018-08-016e539910.7717/peerj.5399Manual restrictions on Palaeolithic technological behavioursAlastair J.M. Key0Christopher J. Dunmore1School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, United KingdomSchool of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, United KingdomThe causes of technological innovation in the Palaeolithic archaeological record are central to understanding Plio-Pleistocene hominin behaviour and temporal trends in artefact variation. Palaeolithic archaeologists frequently investigate the Oldowan-Acheulean transition and technological developments during the subsequent million years of the Acheulean technocomplex. Here, we approach the question of why innovative stone tool production techniques occur in the Lower Palaeolithic archaeological record from an experimental biomechanical and evolutionary perspective. Nine experienced flintknappers reproduced Oldowan flake tools, ‘early Acheulean’ handaxes, and ‘late Acheulean’ handaxes while pressure data were collected from their non-dominant (core-holding) hands. For each flake removal or platform preparation event performed, the percussor used, the stage of reduction, the core securing technique utilised, and the relative success of flake removals were recorded. Results indicate that more heavily reduced, intensively shaped handaxes with greater volumetric controls do not necessarily require significantly greater manual pressure than Oldowan flake tools or earlier ‘rougher’ handaxe forms. Platform preparation events do, however, require significantly greater pressure relative to either soft or hard hammer flake detachments. No significant relationships were identified between flaking success and pressure variation. Our results suggest that the preparation of flake platforms, a technological behaviour associated with the production of late Acheulean handaxes, could plausibly have been restricted prior to the emergence of more forceful precision-manipulative capabilities than those required for earlier lithic technologies.https://peerj.com/articles/5399.pdfManual DexterityManipulationForceOldowan—Acheulean transitionStone tool innovationFlint knapping
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alastair J.M. Key
Christopher J. Dunmore
spellingShingle Alastair J.M. Key
Christopher J. Dunmore
Manual restrictions on Palaeolithic technological behaviours
PeerJ
Manual Dexterity
Manipulation
Force
Oldowan—Acheulean transition
Stone tool innovation
Flint knapping
author_facet Alastair J.M. Key
Christopher J. Dunmore
author_sort Alastair J.M. Key
title Manual restrictions on Palaeolithic technological behaviours
title_short Manual restrictions on Palaeolithic technological behaviours
title_full Manual restrictions on Palaeolithic technological behaviours
title_fullStr Manual restrictions on Palaeolithic technological behaviours
title_full_unstemmed Manual restrictions on Palaeolithic technological behaviours
title_sort manual restrictions on palaeolithic technological behaviours
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2018-08-01
description The causes of technological innovation in the Palaeolithic archaeological record are central to understanding Plio-Pleistocene hominin behaviour and temporal trends in artefact variation. Palaeolithic archaeologists frequently investigate the Oldowan-Acheulean transition and technological developments during the subsequent million years of the Acheulean technocomplex. Here, we approach the question of why innovative stone tool production techniques occur in the Lower Palaeolithic archaeological record from an experimental biomechanical and evolutionary perspective. Nine experienced flintknappers reproduced Oldowan flake tools, ‘early Acheulean’ handaxes, and ‘late Acheulean’ handaxes while pressure data were collected from their non-dominant (core-holding) hands. For each flake removal or platform preparation event performed, the percussor used, the stage of reduction, the core securing technique utilised, and the relative success of flake removals were recorded. Results indicate that more heavily reduced, intensively shaped handaxes with greater volumetric controls do not necessarily require significantly greater manual pressure than Oldowan flake tools or earlier ‘rougher’ handaxe forms. Platform preparation events do, however, require significantly greater pressure relative to either soft or hard hammer flake detachments. No significant relationships were identified between flaking success and pressure variation. Our results suggest that the preparation of flake platforms, a technological behaviour associated with the production of late Acheulean handaxes, could plausibly have been restricted prior to the emergence of more forceful precision-manipulative capabilities than those required for earlier lithic technologies.
topic Manual Dexterity
Manipulation
Force
Oldowan—Acheulean transition
Stone tool innovation
Flint knapping
url https://peerj.com/articles/5399.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alastairjmkey manualrestrictionsonpalaeolithictechnologicalbehaviours
AT christopherjdunmore manualrestrictionsonpalaeolithictechnologicalbehaviours
_version_ 1725607552552534016