Why do families still not receive the child support grant in South Africa? A longitudinal analysis of a cohort of families across South Africa

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Child cash transfers are increasingly recognised for their potential to reduce poverty and improve health outcomes. South Africa‘s child support grant (CSG) constitutes the largest cash transfer in the continent. No studies have been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zembe-Mkabile Wanga, Doherty Tanya, Sanders David, Jackson Debra, Chopra Mickey, Swanevelder Sonja, Lombard Carl, Surender Rebecca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-10-01
Series:BMC International Health and Human Rights
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/12/24
id doaj-dceed462e90f41cc9cbeb29f2c33a24c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dceed462e90f41cc9cbeb29f2c33a24c2021-04-02T13:05:54ZengBMCBMC International Health and Human Rights1472-698X2012-10-011212410.1186/1472-698X-12-24Why do families still not receive the child support grant in South Africa? A longitudinal analysis of a cohort of families across South AfricaZembe-Mkabile WangaDoherty TanyaSanders DavidJackson DebraChopra MickeySwanevelder SonjaLombard CarlSurender Rebecca<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Child cash transfers are increasingly recognised for their potential to reduce poverty and improve health outcomes. South Africa‘s child support grant (CSG) constitutes the largest cash transfer in the continent. No studies have been conducted to look at factors associated with successful receipt of the CSG. This paper reports findings on factors associated with CSG receipt in three settings in South Africa (Paarl in the Western Cape Province, and Umlazi and Rietvlei in KwaZulu-Natal).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This study used longitudinal data from a community-based cluster-randomized trial (PROMISE EBF) promoting exclusive breastfeeding by peer-counsellors in South Africa (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00397150). 1148 mother-infant pairs were enrolled in the study and data on the CSG were collected at infant age 6, 12, 24 weeks and 18–24 months. A stratified cox proportional hazards regression model was fitted to the data to investigate factors associated with CSG receipt.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Uptake of the CSG amongst eligible children at a median age of 22 months was 62% in Paarl, 64% in Rietvlei and 60% in Umlazi. Possessing a birth certificate was found to be the strongest predictor of CSG receipt (HR 3.1, 95% CI: 2.4 -4.1). Other factors also found to be independently associated with CSG receipt were an HIV-positive mother (HR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0-1.4) and a household income below R1100 (HR1.7, 95% CI: 1.1 -2.6).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Receipt of the CSG was sub optimal amongst eligible children showing administrative requirements such as possessing a birth certificate to be a serious barrier to access. In the spirit of promoting and protecting children’s rights, more efforts are needed to improve and ease access to this cash transfer program.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/12/24
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zembe-Mkabile Wanga
Doherty Tanya
Sanders David
Jackson Debra
Chopra Mickey
Swanevelder Sonja
Lombard Carl
Surender Rebecca
spellingShingle Zembe-Mkabile Wanga
Doherty Tanya
Sanders David
Jackson Debra
Chopra Mickey
Swanevelder Sonja
Lombard Carl
Surender Rebecca
Why do families still not receive the child support grant in South Africa? A longitudinal analysis of a cohort of families across South Africa
BMC International Health and Human Rights
author_facet Zembe-Mkabile Wanga
Doherty Tanya
Sanders David
Jackson Debra
Chopra Mickey
Swanevelder Sonja
Lombard Carl
Surender Rebecca
author_sort Zembe-Mkabile Wanga
title Why do families still not receive the child support grant in South Africa? A longitudinal analysis of a cohort of families across South Africa
title_short Why do families still not receive the child support grant in South Africa? A longitudinal analysis of a cohort of families across South Africa
title_full Why do families still not receive the child support grant in South Africa? A longitudinal analysis of a cohort of families across South Africa
title_fullStr Why do families still not receive the child support grant in South Africa? A longitudinal analysis of a cohort of families across South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Why do families still not receive the child support grant in South Africa? A longitudinal analysis of a cohort of families across South Africa
title_sort why do families still not receive the child support grant in south africa? a longitudinal analysis of a cohort of families across south africa
publisher BMC
series BMC International Health and Human Rights
issn 1472-698X
publishDate 2012-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Child cash transfers are increasingly recognised for their potential to reduce poverty and improve health outcomes. South Africa‘s child support grant (CSG) constitutes the largest cash transfer in the continent. No studies have been conducted to look at factors associated with successful receipt of the CSG. This paper reports findings on factors associated with CSG receipt in three settings in South Africa (Paarl in the Western Cape Province, and Umlazi and Rietvlei in KwaZulu-Natal).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This study used longitudinal data from a community-based cluster-randomized trial (PROMISE EBF) promoting exclusive breastfeeding by peer-counsellors in South Africa (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00397150). 1148 mother-infant pairs were enrolled in the study and data on the CSG were collected at infant age 6, 12, 24 weeks and 18–24 months. A stratified cox proportional hazards regression model was fitted to the data to investigate factors associated with CSG receipt.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Uptake of the CSG amongst eligible children at a median age of 22 months was 62% in Paarl, 64% in Rietvlei and 60% in Umlazi. Possessing a birth certificate was found to be the strongest predictor of CSG receipt (HR 3.1, 95% CI: 2.4 -4.1). Other factors also found to be independently associated with CSG receipt were an HIV-positive mother (HR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0-1.4) and a household income below R1100 (HR1.7, 95% CI: 1.1 -2.6).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Receipt of the CSG was sub optimal amongst eligible children showing administrative requirements such as possessing a birth certificate to be a serious barrier to access. In the spirit of promoting and protecting children’s rights, more efforts are needed to improve and ease access to this cash transfer program.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/12/24
work_keys_str_mv AT zembemkabilewanga whydofamiliesstillnotreceivethechildsupportgrantinsouthafricaalongitudinalanalysisofacohortoffamiliesacrosssouthafrica
AT dohertytanya whydofamiliesstillnotreceivethechildsupportgrantinsouthafricaalongitudinalanalysisofacohortoffamiliesacrosssouthafrica
AT sandersdavid whydofamiliesstillnotreceivethechildsupportgrantinsouthafricaalongitudinalanalysisofacohortoffamiliesacrosssouthafrica
AT jacksondebra whydofamiliesstillnotreceivethechildsupportgrantinsouthafricaalongitudinalanalysisofacohortoffamiliesacrosssouthafrica
AT chopramickey whydofamiliesstillnotreceivethechildsupportgrantinsouthafricaalongitudinalanalysisofacohortoffamiliesacrosssouthafrica
AT swaneveldersonja whydofamiliesstillnotreceivethechildsupportgrantinsouthafricaalongitudinalanalysisofacohortoffamiliesacrosssouthafrica
AT lombardcarl whydofamiliesstillnotreceivethechildsupportgrantinsouthafricaalongitudinalanalysisofacohortoffamiliesacrosssouthafrica
AT surenderrebecca whydofamiliesstillnotreceivethechildsupportgrantinsouthafricaalongitudinalanalysisofacohortoffamiliesacrosssouthafrica
_version_ 1721566493032841216