A strawberry, an animal cry and a human subject: Where existential semiotics, biosemiotics and relational metaphysics seem to meet one another

The article discus ses some semiotic approaches to the relation between nature and culture. Starting with outlining the structuralistic approach to this issue, especially the ideas of Juri Lotman and Algirdas Julien Greimas, the author finds parallels between different views on the relation between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katarzyna Machtyl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tartu Press 2019-12-01
Series:Sign Systems Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/16397
id doaj-dd0b61c7a4fa44f4bf78e7f4f8c25af0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd0b61c7a4fa44f4bf78e7f4f8c25af02021-04-02T14:29:00ZengUniversity of Tartu PressSign Systems Studies1406-42431736-74092019-12-01473/410.12697/SSS.2019.47.3-4.05A strawberry, an animal cry and a human subject: Where existential semiotics, biosemiotics and relational metaphysics seem to meet one anotherKatarzyna Machtyl0Department of Cultural Semiotics, Cultural Studies Institute, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89A, 60-568 Poznań, Poland The article discus ses some semiotic approaches to the relation between nature and culture. Starting with outlining the structuralistic approach to this issue, especially the ideas of Juri Lotman and Algirdas Julien Greimas, the author finds parallels between different views on the relation between the natural world and human beings. First, the juxtaposition of Eero Tarasti’s existential semiotics with selected concepts of biosemiotics is discussed. The following part of the paper is dedicated to Bruno Latour’s ideas on nature–culture relation, hybrids and mediations. Then the author refers to Lotman’s notion of the semiosphere as the common space for all living and inanimate elements. Closing the paper with a return to biosemiotics, the author comes back to Tarasti’s ideas and compares these with some ideas in biosemiotics, paying special attention to the concepts of unpredictability, choice and dynamics. The comparison shows that some intuitions, assumptions and theses of these different scholars turn out to be surprisingly convergent. The author believes that the outlined parallels between Tarasti’s view, Latour’s and Lotman’s concepts, and biosemiotics may be promising for further research, inviting detailed study. https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/16397natureculturesemioticsexistential semioticsbiosemioticshybrids
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katarzyna Machtyl
spellingShingle Katarzyna Machtyl
A strawberry, an animal cry and a human subject: Where existential semiotics, biosemiotics and relational metaphysics seem to meet one another
Sign Systems Studies
nature
culture
semiotics
existential semiotics
biosemiotics
hybrids
author_facet Katarzyna Machtyl
author_sort Katarzyna Machtyl
title A strawberry, an animal cry and a human subject: Where existential semiotics, biosemiotics and relational metaphysics seem to meet one another
title_short A strawberry, an animal cry and a human subject: Where existential semiotics, biosemiotics and relational metaphysics seem to meet one another
title_full A strawberry, an animal cry and a human subject: Where existential semiotics, biosemiotics and relational metaphysics seem to meet one another
title_fullStr A strawberry, an animal cry and a human subject: Where existential semiotics, biosemiotics and relational metaphysics seem to meet one another
title_full_unstemmed A strawberry, an animal cry and a human subject: Where existential semiotics, biosemiotics and relational metaphysics seem to meet one another
title_sort strawberry, an animal cry and a human subject: where existential semiotics, biosemiotics and relational metaphysics seem to meet one another
publisher University of Tartu Press
series Sign Systems Studies
issn 1406-4243
1736-7409
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The article discus ses some semiotic approaches to the relation between nature and culture. Starting with outlining the structuralistic approach to this issue, especially the ideas of Juri Lotman and Algirdas Julien Greimas, the author finds parallels between different views on the relation between the natural world and human beings. First, the juxtaposition of Eero Tarasti’s existential semiotics with selected concepts of biosemiotics is discussed. The following part of the paper is dedicated to Bruno Latour’s ideas on nature–culture relation, hybrids and mediations. Then the author refers to Lotman’s notion of the semiosphere as the common space for all living and inanimate elements. Closing the paper with a return to biosemiotics, the author comes back to Tarasti’s ideas and compares these with some ideas in biosemiotics, paying special attention to the concepts of unpredictability, choice and dynamics. The comparison shows that some intuitions, assumptions and theses of these different scholars turn out to be surprisingly convergent. The author believes that the outlined parallels between Tarasti’s view, Latour’s and Lotman’s concepts, and biosemiotics may be promising for further research, inviting detailed study.
topic nature
culture
semiotics
existential semiotics
biosemiotics
hybrids
url https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/16397
work_keys_str_mv AT katarzynamachtyl astrawberryananimalcryandahumansubjectwhereexistentialsemioticsbiosemioticsandrelationalmetaphysicsseemtomeetoneanother
AT katarzynamachtyl strawberryananimalcryandahumansubjectwhereexistentialsemioticsbiosemioticsandrelationalmetaphysicsseemtomeetoneanother
_version_ 1721562155739774976