Laparoscopic sterilization: Is it a safer option for women

Objectives: In developed countries laparoscopy and hysteroscopic are the preferred methods of permanent contraception in females, but in developing countries minilaparotomy is still the preferred method. Purpose of this study is to compare the intra-operative complications of laparoscopic and minila...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naveen Prasanna, Goundi Waseem Akthar, Kavita Mahadevappa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Barpeta Obstetrics and Gynaecological Society 2021-07-01
Series:New Indian Journal of OBGYN
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.barpetaogs.co.in/pdf/08100.pdf
id doaj-dd2a8ba70ecd478eaa621807d499f4f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd2a8ba70ecd478eaa621807d499f4f62021-07-25T05:16:18ZengBarpeta Obstetrics and Gynaecological SocietyNew Indian Journal of OBGYN2454-23342454-23422021-07-018110010410.21276/obgyn.2021.8.1.19Laparoscopic sterilization: Is it a safer option for womenNaveen Prasanna0Goundi Waseem Akthar1Kavita Mahadevappa2Associate Professor, KIMS, Hubli, Karnataka, IndiaPost graduate in Dept. OBG, KIMS, Hubli, Karnataka, IndiaAssociate Professor, KIMS, Hubli, Karnataka, IndiaObjectives: In developed countries laparoscopy and hysteroscopic are the preferred methods of permanent contraception in females, but in developing countries minilaparotomy is still the preferred method. Purpose of this study is to compare the intra-operative complications of laparoscopic and minilaparotomy techniques in interval sterilization. Methods: This is a prospective comparative study conducted from December 2014 to May 2016. A total of 400 women willing for permanent sterilization were selected by considering both inclusion and exclusion criteria. Depending on the women’s choice, two groups (laparoscopy and minilaparotomy) of 200 each were made according to the technique used for sterilization. Results: Mean duration of surgery was 8.00 ± 3.81mins in the laparoscopic group and 19.37 ± 8.60 mins in the minilaparotomy group which was statistically significant. Intraoperative complications attributable to both the procedures occurred in 31(7.75%) women. Injury to tubal mesosalpinx (tear/hematoma) was seen in 6(3.0%) and 5(2.5%) women in laparoscopy and minilaparotomy group respectively. Postoperative complications like abdominal pain and surgical site infection were higher in minilaparotomy group when compared to laparoscopy group which was statistically significant. Conclusion: Laparoscopic sterilization takes significantly lesser operative time, lesser postoperative morbidity and shorter duration of stay in the hospital. The procedure related complications in the laparoscopic group was much higher. Better training of surgeons in laparoscopy, will make laparoscopic sterilization a preferred method.https://journal.barpetaogs.co.in/pdf/08100.pdflaparoscopic sterilizationminilaparotomyintraoperative complicationsinterval sterilization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Naveen Prasanna
Goundi Waseem Akthar
Kavita Mahadevappa
spellingShingle Naveen Prasanna
Goundi Waseem Akthar
Kavita Mahadevappa
Laparoscopic sterilization: Is it a safer option for women
New Indian Journal of OBGYN
laparoscopic sterilization
minilaparotomy
intraoperative complications
interval sterilization
author_facet Naveen Prasanna
Goundi Waseem Akthar
Kavita Mahadevappa
author_sort Naveen Prasanna
title Laparoscopic sterilization: Is it a safer option for women
title_short Laparoscopic sterilization: Is it a safer option for women
title_full Laparoscopic sterilization: Is it a safer option for women
title_fullStr Laparoscopic sterilization: Is it a safer option for women
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic sterilization: Is it a safer option for women
title_sort laparoscopic sterilization: is it a safer option for women
publisher Barpeta Obstetrics and Gynaecological Society
series New Indian Journal of OBGYN
issn 2454-2334
2454-2342
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Objectives: In developed countries laparoscopy and hysteroscopic are the preferred methods of permanent contraception in females, but in developing countries minilaparotomy is still the preferred method. Purpose of this study is to compare the intra-operative complications of laparoscopic and minilaparotomy techniques in interval sterilization. Methods: This is a prospective comparative study conducted from December 2014 to May 2016. A total of 400 women willing for permanent sterilization were selected by considering both inclusion and exclusion criteria. Depending on the women’s choice, two groups (laparoscopy and minilaparotomy) of 200 each were made according to the technique used for sterilization. Results: Mean duration of surgery was 8.00 ± 3.81mins in the laparoscopic group and 19.37 ± 8.60 mins in the minilaparotomy group which was statistically significant. Intraoperative complications attributable to both the procedures occurred in 31(7.75%) women. Injury to tubal mesosalpinx (tear/hematoma) was seen in 6(3.0%) and 5(2.5%) women in laparoscopy and minilaparotomy group respectively. Postoperative complications like abdominal pain and surgical site infection were higher in minilaparotomy group when compared to laparoscopy group which was statistically significant. Conclusion: Laparoscopic sterilization takes significantly lesser operative time, lesser postoperative morbidity and shorter duration of stay in the hospital. The procedure related complications in the laparoscopic group was much higher. Better training of surgeons in laparoscopy, will make laparoscopic sterilization a preferred method.
topic laparoscopic sterilization
minilaparotomy
intraoperative complications
interval sterilization
url https://journal.barpetaogs.co.in/pdf/08100.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT naveenprasanna laparoscopicsterilizationisitasaferoptionforwomen
AT goundiwaseemakthar laparoscopicsterilizationisitasaferoptionforwomen
AT kavitamahadevappa laparoscopicsterilizationisitasaferoptionforwomen
_version_ 1721283704984174592