PHYSIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF ELITE TRIATHLETES: A COMPARISON BETWEEN YOUNG AND PROFESSIONAL COMPETITORS

The aim of the present work was to compare the cardiorespiratory response of two high level groups of triathletes of different age during a simulation of a cycling-running succession. The two groups, G1 (n=6; age 23.8 ± 5.6 years; weight 71.2 ± 8.7 kg; height 180.0 ± 8.8 cm) and G2 (n=9; age 15.2 ±...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Díaz, Víctor, Zapico, Augusto G., Peinado, Ana B., Álvarez, María, Benito, Pedro J., Calderón, Francisco J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alicante 2009-10-01
Series:Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
Online Access:http://Cycling-runningtrial;comparativestudy;metaboliccost;cardiorespiratoryresponse;performance
id doaj-dd4be9069a2d4762aef1db0516c57d90
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd4be9069a2d4762aef1db0516c57d902020-11-24T20:55:56ZengUniversity of AlicanteJournal of Human Sport and Exercise1988-52022009-10-0143237245PHYSIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF ELITE TRIATHLETES: A COMPARISON BETWEEN YOUNG AND PROFESSIONAL COMPETITORSDíaz, VíctorZapico, Augusto G.Peinado, Ana B.Álvarez, MaríaBenito, Pedro J.Calderón, Francisco J.The aim of the present work was to compare the cardiorespiratory response of two high level groups of triathletes of different age during a simulation of a cycling-running succession. The two groups, G1 (n=6; age 23.8 ± 5.6 years; weight 71.2 ± 8.7 kg; height 180.0 ± 8.8 cm) and G2 (n=9; age 15.2 ± 0.7 years; weight 60.2 ± 6.8 kg; height 173.6 ± 6.4 cm) performed two tests in a random order. Trial 1 (C-R) consisted of 30 min cycling with a load corresponding to the ventilatory threshold previously calculated, followed by a 3000 m run at the highest possible intensity around a 400 m track. Trial 2 (R), consisted of a 3000 m run at the maximum intensity possible only. The G1 subjects took less time to complete the distance (591.2 compared to 669.1 s for the G2 subjects in the C-R setting, and 584.6 vs. 645.5 s in the R setting). In addition, the G1 subjects showed a more adapted cardiorespiratory response than the G2 subjects. In conclusion, the results show a profile in terms of cardiorespiratory response and performance for senior and young triathletes highly trained. Cycling-runningtrial;comparativestudy;metaboliccost;cardiorespiratoryresponse;performance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Díaz, Víctor
Zapico, Augusto G.
Peinado, Ana B.
Álvarez, María
Benito, Pedro J.
Calderón, Francisco J.
spellingShingle Díaz, Víctor
Zapico, Augusto G.
Peinado, Ana B.
Álvarez, María
Benito, Pedro J.
Calderón, Francisco J.
PHYSIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF ELITE TRIATHLETES: A COMPARISON BETWEEN YOUNG AND PROFESSIONAL COMPETITORS
Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
author_facet Díaz, Víctor
Zapico, Augusto G.
Peinado, Ana B.
Álvarez, María
Benito, Pedro J.
Calderón, Francisco J.
author_sort Díaz, Víctor
title PHYSIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF ELITE TRIATHLETES: A COMPARISON BETWEEN YOUNG AND PROFESSIONAL COMPETITORS
title_short PHYSIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF ELITE TRIATHLETES: A COMPARISON BETWEEN YOUNG AND PROFESSIONAL COMPETITORS
title_full PHYSIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF ELITE TRIATHLETES: A COMPARISON BETWEEN YOUNG AND PROFESSIONAL COMPETITORS
title_fullStr PHYSIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF ELITE TRIATHLETES: A COMPARISON BETWEEN YOUNG AND PROFESSIONAL COMPETITORS
title_full_unstemmed PHYSIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF ELITE TRIATHLETES: A COMPARISON BETWEEN YOUNG AND PROFESSIONAL COMPETITORS
title_sort physiological profile of elite triathletes: a comparison between young and professional competitors
publisher University of Alicante
series Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
issn 1988-5202
publishDate 2009-10-01
description The aim of the present work was to compare the cardiorespiratory response of two high level groups of triathletes of different age during a simulation of a cycling-running succession. The two groups, G1 (n=6; age 23.8 ± 5.6 years; weight 71.2 ± 8.7 kg; height 180.0 ± 8.8 cm) and G2 (n=9; age 15.2 ± 0.7 years; weight 60.2 ± 6.8 kg; height 173.6 ± 6.4 cm) performed two tests in a random order. Trial 1 (C-R) consisted of 30 min cycling with a load corresponding to the ventilatory threshold previously calculated, followed by a 3000 m run at the highest possible intensity around a 400 m track. Trial 2 (R), consisted of a 3000 m run at the maximum intensity possible only. The G1 subjects took less time to complete the distance (591.2 compared to 669.1 s for the G2 subjects in the C-R setting, and 584.6 vs. 645.5 s in the R setting). In addition, the G1 subjects showed a more adapted cardiorespiratory response than the G2 subjects. In conclusion, the results show a profile in terms of cardiorespiratory response and performance for senior and young triathletes highly trained.
url http://Cycling-runningtrial;comparativestudy;metaboliccost;cardiorespiratoryresponse;performance
work_keys_str_mv AT diazvictor physiologicalprofileofelitetriathletesacomparisonbetweenyoungandprofessionalcompetitors
AT zapicoaugustog physiologicalprofileofelitetriathletesacomparisonbetweenyoungandprofessionalcompetitors
AT peinadoanab physiologicalprofileofelitetriathletesacomparisonbetweenyoungandprofessionalcompetitors
AT alvarezmaria physiologicalprofileofelitetriathletesacomparisonbetweenyoungandprofessionalcompetitors
AT benitopedroj physiologicalprofileofelitetriathletesacomparisonbetweenyoungandprofessionalcompetitors
AT calderonfranciscoj physiologicalprofileofelitetriathletesacomparisonbetweenyoungandprofessionalcompetitors
_version_ 1716791458330050560