Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complications

Abstract The choice of surgical technique in orthognathic surgery is based primarily on the surgical treatment objectives (STO), which is a fundamental component of the orthognathic treatment process. In the conventional orthodontics-first approach, presurgical planning can be performed twice, durin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tae-Geon Kwon, Michael D. Han
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-06-01
Series:Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40902-019-0206-4
id doaj-dd4e985cd24c443e89852f8abbd614f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd4e985cd24c443e89852f8abbd614f82020-11-25T03:16:52ZengSpringerOpenMaxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery2288-85862019-06-0141111010.1186/s40902-019-0206-4Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complicationsTae-Geon Kwon0Michael D. Han1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National UniversityDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at ChicagoAbstract The choice of surgical technique in orthognathic surgery is based primarily on the surgical treatment objectives (STO), which is a fundamental component of the orthognathic treatment process. In the conventional orthodontics-first approach, presurgical planning can be performed twice, during the preorthodontic (initial STO) and presurgical phases (final STO). Recently, a surgery-first orthognathic approach (SFA) without presurgical orthodontic treatment has been introduced and combined initial and final STO at the same time. In contrast to the conventional surgical-orthodontic treatment protocol that includes preoperative orthodontics for dental decompensations to maximize stable postoperative occlusion, the SFA potentially shortens the treatment period and minimizes esthetic concerns during the decompensation period because skeletal problems are corrected from the beginning. The indications for the SFA have been proposed in the literature, but no consensus exists. Moreover, because dental occlusion of the pre-orthodontic arches cannot be used as a guide for establishing the surgical treatment plan, there are fundamental limitations in accurate prediction of postsurgical results in the SFA. Recently, the concepts of postsurgical orthodontic treatment are continuously changing and evolving to overcome this inherent limitation of the SFA. The elimination of presurgical orthodontics can change the paradigm of orthognathic surgery but still requires cautious case selection and thorough discussion and collaboration between orthodontists and surgeons regarding the goals and postoperative management of the orthognathic procedure.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40902-019-0206-4Surgery firstOrthognathic surgeryComplicationsStabilityOrthodontics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tae-Geon Kwon
Michael D. Han
spellingShingle Tae-Geon Kwon
Michael D. Han
Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complications
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Surgery first
Orthognathic surgery
Complications
Stability
Orthodontics
author_facet Tae-Geon Kwon
Michael D. Han
author_sort Tae-Geon Kwon
title Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complications
title_short Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complications
title_full Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complications
title_fullStr Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complications
title_full_unstemmed Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complications
title_sort current status of surgery first approach (part ii): precautions and complications
publisher SpringerOpen
series Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
issn 2288-8586
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract The choice of surgical technique in orthognathic surgery is based primarily on the surgical treatment objectives (STO), which is a fundamental component of the orthognathic treatment process. In the conventional orthodontics-first approach, presurgical planning can be performed twice, during the preorthodontic (initial STO) and presurgical phases (final STO). Recently, a surgery-first orthognathic approach (SFA) without presurgical orthodontic treatment has been introduced and combined initial and final STO at the same time. In contrast to the conventional surgical-orthodontic treatment protocol that includes preoperative orthodontics for dental decompensations to maximize stable postoperative occlusion, the SFA potentially shortens the treatment period and minimizes esthetic concerns during the decompensation period because skeletal problems are corrected from the beginning. The indications for the SFA have been proposed in the literature, but no consensus exists. Moreover, because dental occlusion of the pre-orthodontic arches cannot be used as a guide for establishing the surgical treatment plan, there are fundamental limitations in accurate prediction of postsurgical results in the SFA. Recently, the concepts of postsurgical orthodontic treatment are continuously changing and evolving to overcome this inherent limitation of the SFA. The elimination of presurgical orthodontics can change the paradigm of orthognathic surgery but still requires cautious case selection and thorough discussion and collaboration between orthodontists and surgeons regarding the goals and postoperative management of the orthognathic procedure.
topic Surgery first
Orthognathic surgery
Complications
Stability
Orthodontics
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40902-019-0206-4
work_keys_str_mv AT taegeonkwon currentstatusofsurgeryfirstapproachpartiiprecautionsandcomplications
AT michaeldhan currentstatusofsurgeryfirstapproachpartiiprecautionsandcomplications
_version_ 1724634621099900928