Comparison of the toxicity and repellency of two conventional neonicotinoids and a coconut-derived insecticide soap toward the parasitoid wasp Aphelinus mali Haldeman, 1851

• Main Authors: Asgar EBADOLLAHI, Reza SADEGHI
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty 2020-02-01
• Series: Acta Agriculturae Slovenica
• Subjects: eriosoma lanigerum; aphelinus mali; insecticides; toxicity; repellency
• Online Access: http://ojs.aas.bf.uni-lj.si/index.php/AAS/article/view/1370

<p><strong></strong>The parasitoid wasp <em>Aphelinus mali</em>,Haldeman, 1851 (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) is the most important biological control agent against the woolly apple aphid,<em> Eriosoma lanigerum</em> (Hausemann, 1802) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), which is an important apple orchards pest throughout the world. Based on the importance of using low-risk compounds to protect beneficial agents, the present study was carried out to evaluate the toxic and repellent effects of two conventional chemicals (imidacloprid and thiacloprid) and coconut-derived biopesticide soap (Palizin^Ò) toward <em>A. mali</em>. The results of residual bioassays on apple leaf discs indicated that imidacloprid after 24 h and insecticide soap after 72 h exposure time categorized at the highest and no/little toxicity rates, respectively. Ingestion bioassays on filter papers revealed that imidacloprid and thiacloprid had moderate toxicity rate, while insecticide soap had a low-level toxicity rate. Repellency test at Y-tube olfactometer showed that the repellent effects of both chemicals were more than that of insecticide soap. It is concluded that coconut-derived soap was compatible with the parasitoid activity, and the caution should be paid when including the two neonicotinoid insecticides imidacloprid and thiacloprid for <em>E. lanigerum</em> management.</p>