Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results of two different horizontal ridge augmentation techniques: guided bone regeneration with sticky bone (SB) and the bone-shell technique (BS). Methods: Records of patients who underwent horizontal ridge augmentation with SB (test) a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Horia Mihail Barbu, Stefania Andrada Iancu, Antonio Rapani, Claudio Stacchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/17/3953
id doaj-dd5c7ed68c0a4e5f98f1db4ea0f65ba3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd5c7ed68c0a4e5f98f1db4ea0f65ba32021-09-09T13:49:50ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-08-01103953395310.3390/jcm10173953Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective StudyHoria Mihail Barbu0Stefania Andrada Iancu1Antonio Rapani2Claudio Stacchi3Head of Oral Implantology Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 031593 Bucharest, RomaniaEuropean Centre of Oral Implantology, 011473 Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34129 Trieste, ItalyDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34129 Trieste, ItalyBackground: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results of two different horizontal ridge augmentation techniques: guided bone regeneration with sticky bone (SB) and the bone-shell technique (BS). Methods: Records of patients who underwent horizontal ridge augmentation with SB (test) and BS (control) were screened for inclusion. Pre-operative and 6-month post-operative ridge widths were measured on cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) and compared. Post-operative complications and implant survival rate were recorded. Results: Eighty consecutive patients were included in the present study. Post-operative complications (flap dehiscence, and graft infection) occurred in ten patients, who dropped out from the study (12.5% complication rate). Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant inverse correlation between the occurrence of post-operative complications and ridge width (<i>p</i> = 0.025). Seventy patients (35 test; 35 control) with a total of 127 implants were included in the final analysis. Mean ridge width gain was 3.7 ± 1.2 mm in the test and 3.7 ± 1.1 mm in the control group, with no significant difference between the two groups. No implant failure was recorded, with a mean follow-up of 42.7 ± 16.0 months after functional loading. Conclusions: SB and BS showed comparable clinical outcomes in horizontal ridge augmentation, resulting in sufficient crestal width increase to allow implant placement in an adequate bone envelope.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/17/3953bone-shell techniquesticky bonelateral ridge augmentationparticulate bone graftingguided bone regenerationautologous bone chips
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Horia Mihail Barbu
Stefania Andrada Iancu
Antonio Rapani
Claudio Stacchi
spellingShingle Horia Mihail Barbu
Stefania Andrada Iancu
Antonio Rapani
Claudio Stacchi
Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study
Journal of Clinical Medicine
bone-shell technique
sticky bone
lateral ridge augmentation
particulate bone grafting
guided bone regeneration
autologous bone chips
author_facet Horia Mihail Barbu
Stefania Andrada Iancu
Antonio Rapani
Claudio Stacchi
author_sort Horia Mihail Barbu
title Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study
title_short Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study
title_full Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study
title_sort guided bone regeneration with concentrated growth factor enriched bone graft matrix (sticky bone) vs. bone-shell technique in horizontal ridge augmentation: a retrospective study
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Background: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results of two different horizontal ridge augmentation techniques: guided bone regeneration with sticky bone (SB) and the bone-shell technique (BS). Methods: Records of patients who underwent horizontal ridge augmentation with SB (test) and BS (control) were screened for inclusion. Pre-operative and 6-month post-operative ridge widths were measured on cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) and compared. Post-operative complications and implant survival rate were recorded. Results: Eighty consecutive patients were included in the present study. Post-operative complications (flap dehiscence, and graft infection) occurred in ten patients, who dropped out from the study (12.5% complication rate). Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant inverse correlation between the occurrence of post-operative complications and ridge width (<i>p</i> = 0.025). Seventy patients (35 test; 35 control) with a total of 127 implants were included in the final analysis. Mean ridge width gain was 3.7 ± 1.2 mm in the test and 3.7 ± 1.1 mm in the control group, with no significant difference between the two groups. No implant failure was recorded, with a mean follow-up of 42.7 ± 16.0 months after functional loading. Conclusions: SB and BS showed comparable clinical outcomes in horizontal ridge augmentation, resulting in sufficient crestal width increase to allow implant placement in an adequate bone envelope.
topic bone-shell technique
sticky bone
lateral ridge augmentation
particulate bone grafting
guided bone regeneration
autologous bone chips
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/17/3953
work_keys_str_mv AT horiamihailbarbu guidedboneregenerationwithconcentratedgrowthfactorenrichedbonegraftmatrixstickybonevsboneshelltechniqueinhorizontalridgeaugmentationaretrospectivestudy
AT stefaniaandradaiancu guidedboneregenerationwithconcentratedgrowthfactorenrichedbonegraftmatrixstickybonevsboneshelltechniqueinhorizontalridgeaugmentationaretrospectivestudy
AT antoniorapani guidedboneregenerationwithconcentratedgrowthfactorenrichedbonegraftmatrixstickybonevsboneshelltechniqueinhorizontalridgeaugmentationaretrospectivestudy
AT claudiostacchi guidedboneregenerationwithconcentratedgrowthfactorenrichedbonegraftmatrixstickybonevsboneshelltechniqueinhorizontalridgeaugmentationaretrospectivestudy
_version_ 1717759974878216192