Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results of two different horizontal ridge augmentation techniques: guided bone regeneration with sticky bone (SB) and the bone-shell technique (BS). Methods: Records of patients who underwent horizontal ridge augmentation with SB (test) a...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/17/3953 |
id |
doaj-dd5c7ed68c0a4e5f98f1db4ea0f65ba3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dd5c7ed68c0a4e5f98f1db4ea0f65ba32021-09-09T13:49:50ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-08-01103953395310.3390/jcm10173953Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective StudyHoria Mihail Barbu0Stefania Andrada Iancu1Antonio Rapani2Claudio Stacchi3Head of Oral Implantology Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 031593 Bucharest, RomaniaEuropean Centre of Oral Implantology, 011473 Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34129 Trieste, ItalyDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34129 Trieste, ItalyBackground: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results of two different horizontal ridge augmentation techniques: guided bone regeneration with sticky bone (SB) and the bone-shell technique (BS). Methods: Records of patients who underwent horizontal ridge augmentation with SB (test) and BS (control) were screened for inclusion. Pre-operative and 6-month post-operative ridge widths were measured on cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) and compared. Post-operative complications and implant survival rate were recorded. Results: Eighty consecutive patients were included in the present study. Post-operative complications (flap dehiscence, and graft infection) occurred in ten patients, who dropped out from the study (12.5% complication rate). Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant inverse correlation between the occurrence of post-operative complications and ridge width (<i>p</i> = 0.025). Seventy patients (35 test; 35 control) with a total of 127 implants were included in the final analysis. Mean ridge width gain was 3.7 ± 1.2 mm in the test and 3.7 ± 1.1 mm in the control group, with no significant difference between the two groups. No implant failure was recorded, with a mean follow-up of 42.7 ± 16.0 months after functional loading. Conclusions: SB and BS showed comparable clinical outcomes in horizontal ridge augmentation, resulting in sufficient crestal width increase to allow implant placement in an adequate bone envelope.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/17/3953bone-shell techniquesticky bonelateral ridge augmentationparticulate bone graftingguided bone regenerationautologous bone chips |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Horia Mihail Barbu Stefania Andrada Iancu Antonio Rapani Claudio Stacchi |
spellingShingle |
Horia Mihail Barbu Stefania Andrada Iancu Antonio Rapani Claudio Stacchi Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study Journal of Clinical Medicine bone-shell technique sticky bone lateral ridge augmentation particulate bone grafting guided bone regeneration autologous bone chips |
author_facet |
Horia Mihail Barbu Stefania Andrada Iancu Antonio Rapani Claudio Stacchi |
author_sort |
Horia Mihail Barbu |
title |
Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study |
title_short |
Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study |
title_full |
Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr |
Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort |
guided bone regeneration with concentrated growth factor enriched bone graft matrix (sticky bone) vs. bone-shell technique in horizontal ridge augmentation: a retrospective study |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Clinical Medicine |
issn |
2077-0383 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results of two different horizontal ridge augmentation techniques: guided bone regeneration with sticky bone (SB) and the bone-shell technique (BS). Methods: Records of patients who underwent horizontal ridge augmentation with SB (test) and BS (control) were screened for inclusion. Pre-operative and 6-month post-operative ridge widths were measured on cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) and compared. Post-operative complications and implant survival rate were recorded. Results: Eighty consecutive patients were included in the present study. Post-operative complications (flap dehiscence, and graft infection) occurred in ten patients, who dropped out from the study (12.5% complication rate). Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant inverse correlation between the occurrence of post-operative complications and ridge width (<i>p</i> = 0.025). Seventy patients (35 test; 35 control) with a total of 127 implants were included in the final analysis. Mean ridge width gain was 3.7 ± 1.2 mm in the test and 3.7 ± 1.1 mm in the control group, with no significant difference between the two groups. No implant failure was recorded, with a mean follow-up of 42.7 ± 16.0 months after functional loading. Conclusions: SB and BS showed comparable clinical outcomes in horizontal ridge augmentation, resulting in sufficient crestal width increase to allow implant placement in an adequate bone envelope. |
topic |
bone-shell technique sticky bone lateral ridge augmentation particulate bone grafting guided bone regeneration autologous bone chips |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/17/3953 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT horiamihailbarbu guidedboneregenerationwithconcentratedgrowthfactorenrichedbonegraftmatrixstickybonevsboneshelltechniqueinhorizontalridgeaugmentationaretrospectivestudy AT stefaniaandradaiancu guidedboneregenerationwithconcentratedgrowthfactorenrichedbonegraftmatrixstickybonevsboneshelltechniqueinhorizontalridgeaugmentationaretrospectivestudy AT antoniorapani guidedboneregenerationwithconcentratedgrowthfactorenrichedbonegraftmatrixstickybonevsboneshelltechniqueinhorizontalridgeaugmentationaretrospectivestudy AT claudiostacchi guidedboneregenerationwithconcentratedgrowthfactorenrichedbonegraftmatrixstickybonevsboneshelltechniqueinhorizontalridgeaugmentationaretrospectivestudy |
_version_ |
1717759974878216192 |