Muscle Power during Standing and Seated Trunk Rotations with Different Weights
This study compares peak and mean power during standing and seated trunk rotations with different weights. Twenty seven fit men completed four trials of trunk rotations in both standing and seated positions with a bar weight of 5.5, 10.5, 15.5, and 20 kg placed on the shoulders. The FiTRO Torso Prem...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Montenegrin Sports Academy and Faculty for Sport and Physical Education
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Sport Mont |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sportmont.ucg.ac.me/clanci/SMJ_October_2017_Zemkova_17-23.pdf |
id |
doaj-dd64254befa949e88c194b52e159c1a5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dd64254befa949e88c194b52e159c1a52020-11-24T21:58:41ZengMontenegrin Sports Academy and Faculty for Sport and Physical EducationSport Mont 1451-74852337-03512017-10-011531723Muscle Power during Standing and Seated Trunk Rotations with Different WeightsErika Zemková0 Michal Jeleň1 Ludmila Zapletalová2 Dusan Hamar3Comenius University in Bratislava, Department of Sports Kinanthropology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Bratislava, Slovakia Slovak University of Technology, Sports Technology Institute, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Bratislava, SlovakiaSlovak University of Technology, Sports Technology Institute, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Bratislava, SlovakiaComenius University in Bratislava, Department of Sports Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Bratislava, SlovakiaComenius University in Bratislava, Department of Sports Kinanthropology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Bratislava, Slovakia This study compares peak and mean power during standing and seated trunk rotations with different weights. Twenty seven fit men completed four trials of trunk rotations in both standing and seated positions with a bar weight of 5.5, 10.5, 15.5, and 20 kg placed on the shoulders. The FiTRO Torso Premium was used to monitor basic biomechanical parameters throughout the movement. Results showed significantly higher peak power during standing than seated trunk rotations at weights of 20 kg (274.4±63.5 vs. 206.4±54.6 W, p=0.004), 15.5 kg (371.2±93.9 vs. 313.5±72.3 W, p=0.007), and 10.5 kg (336.9±77.8 vs. 286.3±66.0 W, p=0.009) but not at 5.5 kg (191.6±46.2 vs. 166.0±37.0 W, p=0.061). Similarly, mean power in the acceleration phase of trunk rotations was significantly higher when performed in standing than seated position at weights of 20 kg (143.2±32.1 vs. 101.9±23.7 W, p=0.008), 15.5 kg (185.1±42.3 vs. 150.4±36.5 W, p=0.019), and 10.5 kg (169.8±40.7 vs. 139.7±31.6 W, p=0.024) but not at 5.5 kg (107.4±29.4 vs. 86.5±21.1 W, p=0.111). Furthermore, peak and mean power during standing trunk rotations significantly correlated with values achieved in the seated position at the weight of 5.5 kg (r=0.684, p=0.027; r=0.676, p=0.033) but not at 10.5 kg (r=0.589, p=0.089; r=0.552, p=0.143), 15.5 kg (r=0.493, p=0.243; r=0.436, p=0.298), and 20 kg (r=0.357, p=0.361; r=0.333, p=0.417). In conclusion, power production is greater during standing as compared to seated trunk rotations, with more pronounced differences at higher weights. This fact has to be taken into account when training and testing the trunk rotational power.http://www.sportmont.ucg.ac.me/clanci/SMJ_October_2017_Zemkova_17-23.pdfadditional loadrotational powerstanding/sitting positionstrunk movement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Erika Zemková Michal Jeleň Ludmila Zapletalová Dusan Hamar |
spellingShingle |
Erika Zemková Michal Jeleň Ludmila Zapletalová Dusan Hamar Muscle Power during Standing and Seated Trunk Rotations with Different Weights Sport Mont additional load rotational power standing/sitting positions trunk movement |
author_facet |
Erika Zemková Michal Jeleň Ludmila Zapletalová Dusan Hamar |
author_sort |
Erika Zemková |
title |
Muscle Power during Standing and Seated Trunk Rotations with Different Weights |
title_short |
Muscle Power during Standing and Seated Trunk Rotations with Different Weights |
title_full |
Muscle Power during Standing and Seated Trunk Rotations with Different Weights |
title_fullStr |
Muscle Power during Standing and Seated Trunk Rotations with Different Weights |
title_full_unstemmed |
Muscle Power during Standing and Seated Trunk Rotations with Different Weights |
title_sort |
muscle power during standing and seated trunk rotations with different weights |
publisher |
Montenegrin Sports Academy and Faculty for Sport and Physical Education |
series |
Sport Mont |
issn |
1451-7485 2337-0351 |
publishDate |
2017-10-01 |
description |
This study compares peak and mean power during standing and seated trunk rotations with different weights. Twenty seven fit men completed four trials of trunk rotations in both standing and seated positions with a bar weight of 5.5, 10.5, 15.5, and 20 kg placed on the shoulders. The FiTRO Torso Premium was used to monitor basic biomechanical parameters throughout the movement. Results showed significantly higher peak power during standing than seated trunk rotations at weights of 20 kg (274.4±63.5 vs. 206.4±54.6 W, p=0.004), 15.5 kg (371.2±93.9 vs. 313.5±72.3 W, p=0.007), and 10.5 kg (336.9±77.8 vs. 286.3±66.0 W, p=0.009) but not at 5.5 kg (191.6±46.2 vs. 166.0±37.0 W, p=0.061). Similarly, mean power in the acceleration phase of trunk rotations was significantly higher when performed in standing than seated position at weights of 20 kg (143.2±32.1 vs. 101.9±23.7 W, p=0.008), 15.5 kg (185.1±42.3 vs. 150.4±36.5 W, p=0.019), and 10.5 kg (169.8±40.7 vs. 139.7±31.6 W, p=0.024) but not at 5.5 kg (107.4±29.4 vs. 86.5±21.1 W, p=0.111). Furthermore, peak and mean power during standing trunk rotations significantly correlated with values achieved in the seated position at the weight of 5.5 kg (r=0.684, p=0.027; r=0.676, p=0.033) but not at 10.5 kg (r=0.589, p=0.089; r=0.552, p=0.143), 15.5 kg (r=0.493, p=0.243; r=0.436, p=0.298), and 20 kg (r=0.357, p=0.361; r=0.333, p=0.417). In conclusion, power production is greater during standing as compared to seated trunk rotations, with more pronounced differences at higher weights. This fact has to be taken into account when training and testing the trunk rotational power. |
topic |
additional load rotational power standing/sitting positions trunk movement |
url |
http://www.sportmont.ucg.ac.me/clanci/SMJ_October_2017_Zemkova_17-23.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT erikazemkova musclepowerduringstandingandseatedtrunkrotationswithdifferentweights AT michaljelen musclepowerduringstandingandseatedtrunkrotationswithdifferentweights AT ludmilazapletalova musclepowerduringstandingandseatedtrunkrotationswithdifferentweights AT dusanhamar musclepowerduringstandingandseatedtrunkrotationswithdifferentweights |
_version_ |
1725850739902775296 |