Recurrent colorectal liver metastasis patients could benefit from repeat hepatic resection

Abstract Background Local treatment remains the best option for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The current study aimed to investigate predictive factors of survival outcomes and select candidates for local treatment for CRLM at first recurrence. Methods Data were collected retrospecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei Liu, Jia-Ming Liu, Kun Wang, Hong-Wei Wang, Bao-Cai Xing
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
RFA
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01323-y
id doaj-dd833d5d737648db9a7bd350554ae72d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd833d5d737648db9a7bd350554ae72d2021-08-22T11:10:37ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822021-08-0121111010.1186/s12893-021-01323-yRecurrent colorectal liver metastasis patients could benefit from repeat hepatic resectionWei Liu0Jia-Ming Liu1Kun Wang2Hong-Wei Wang3Bao-Cai Xing4Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and InstituteHepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and InstituteHepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and InstituteHepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and InstituteHepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and InstituteAbstract Background Local treatment remains the best option for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The current study aimed to investigate predictive factors of survival outcomes and select candidates for local treatment for CRLM at first recurrence. Methods Data were collected retrospectively from CRLM patients who underwent hepatic resection and developed first recurrence between 2000 and 2019 at our institution.
A nomogram predicting overall survival was established based on a multivariable Cox model of clinicopathologic factors. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by the concordance index and calibration curve. Results Among 867 patients who underwent curative hepatic resection, 549 patients developed recurrence. Three hundred patients were evaluated and had resectable and liver-limited disease. Among them, repeat liver resection and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation were performed in 88 and 85 patients, respectively. The other 127 patients received only systemic chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis identified primary lymph node positivity, tumor size > 3 cm, early recurrence, RAS gene mutation and no local treatment as independent risk factors for survival outcomes. Integrating these five variables, the nomogram presented a good concordance index of 0.707. Compared with patients who received only systemic chemotherapy, radical local treatment did not significantly improve survival outcomes (median OS: 21 vs. 15 months, p = 0.126) in the high-risk group (total score ≥ 13). Conclusion Radical local treatment improved the survival of recurrent CRLM patients. The proposed model facilitates personalized assessments of prognosis for patients who develop first recurrence in the liver.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01323-yCRLMRecurrenceRepeatResectionRFA
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wei Liu
Jia-Ming Liu
Kun Wang
Hong-Wei Wang
Bao-Cai Xing
spellingShingle Wei Liu
Jia-Ming Liu
Kun Wang
Hong-Wei Wang
Bao-Cai Xing
Recurrent colorectal liver metastasis patients could benefit from repeat hepatic resection
BMC Surgery
CRLM
Recurrence
Repeat
Resection
RFA
author_facet Wei Liu
Jia-Ming Liu
Kun Wang
Hong-Wei Wang
Bao-Cai Xing
author_sort Wei Liu
title Recurrent colorectal liver metastasis patients could benefit from repeat hepatic resection
title_short Recurrent colorectal liver metastasis patients could benefit from repeat hepatic resection
title_full Recurrent colorectal liver metastasis patients could benefit from repeat hepatic resection
title_fullStr Recurrent colorectal liver metastasis patients could benefit from repeat hepatic resection
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent colorectal liver metastasis patients could benefit from repeat hepatic resection
title_sort recurrent colorectal liver metastasis patients could benefit from repeat hepatic resection
publisher BMC
series BMC Surgery
issn 1471-2482
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Abstract Background Local treatment remains the best option for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The current study aimed to investigate predictive factors of survival outcomes and select candidates for local treatment for CRLM at first recurrence. Methods Data were collected retrospectively from CRLM patients who underwent hepatic resection and developed first recurrence between 2000 and 2019 at our institution.
A nomogram predicting overall survival was established based on a multivariable Cox model of clinicopathologic factors. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by the concordance index and calibration curve. Results Among 867 patients who underwent curative hepatic resection, 549 patients developed recurrence. Three hundred patients were evaluated and had resectable and liver-limited disease. Among them, repeat liver resection and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation were performed in 88 and 85 patients, respectively. The other 127 patients received only systemic chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis identified primary lymph node positivity, tumor size > 3 cm, early recurrence, RAS gene mutation and no local treatment as independent risk factors for survival outcomes. Integrating these five variables, the nomogram presented a good concordance index of 0.707. Compared with patients who received only systemic chemotherapy, radical local treatment did not significantly improve survival outcomes (median OS: 21 vs. 15 months, p = 0.126) in the high-risk group (total score ≥ 13). Conclusion Radical local treatment improved the survival of recurrent CRLM patients. The proposed model facilitates personalized assessments of prognosis for patients who develop first recurrence in the liver.
topic CRLM
Recurrence
Repeat
Resection
RFA
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01323-y
work_keys_str_mv AT weiliu recurrentcolorectallivermetastasispatientscouldbenefitfromrepeathepaticresection
AT jiamingliu recurrentcolorectallivermetastasispatientscouldbenefitfromrepeathepaticresection
AT kunwang recurrentcolorectallivermetastasispatientscouldbenefitfromrepeathepaticresection
AT hongweiwang recurrentcolorectallivermetastasispatientscouldbenefitfromrepeathepaticresection
AT baocaixing recurrentcolorectallivermetastasispatientscouldbenefitfromrepeathepaticresection
_version_ 1721200139251482624