Temporal Regularity May Not Improve Memory for Item-Specific Detail

Regularities in event timing allow for the allocation of attention to critical time-points when an event is most likely to occur, leading to improved visual perception. Results from recent studies indicate that similar benefits may extend to memory for scenes and objects. Here, we investigated wheth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mrinmayi Kulkarni, Deborah E. Hannula
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623402/full
id doaj-ddae22a475d641db99ca74ee88696790
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ddae22a475d641db99ca74ee886967902021-03-11T05:34:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-03-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.623402623402Temporal Regularity May Not Improve Memory for Item-Specific DetailMrinmayi KulkarniDeborah E. HannulaRegularities in event timing allow for the allocation of attention to critical time-points when an event is most likely to occur, leading to improved visual perception. Results from recent studies indicate that similar benefits may extend to memory for scenes and objects. Here, we investigated whether benefits of temporal regularity are evident when detailed, item-specific representations are necessary for successful recognition memory performance. In Experiments 1 and 2, pictures of objects were presented with either predictable or randomized event timing, in separate encoding blocks. In the test phase, old and new objects were presented, intermixed with perceptually similar exemplars of encoded objects. In Experiment 3 we attempted to replicate previously reported memory enhancements for scenes. In contrast to predictions, temporal regularity did not affect response times (RT) or improve recognition memory accuracy in any of our experiments. These results suggest that any effects of temporal expectation on memory are subtle and may be sensitive to minor changes in task parameters. In sum, indirect upregulation of attention through imposed temporal structure may not be sufficient to have downstream effects on memory performance.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623402/fullepisodic memorypattern separationattentionentrainmenttemporal expectationtiming
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mrinmayi Kulkarni
Deborah E. Hannula
spellingShingle Mrinmayi Kulkarni
Deborah E. Hannula
Temporal Regularity May Not Improve Memory for Item-Specific Detail
Frontiers in Psychology
episodic memory
pattern separation
attention
entrainment
temporal expectation
timing
author_facet Mrinmayi Kulkarni
Deborah E. Hannula
author_sort Mrinmayi Kulkarni
title Temporal Regularity May Not Improve Memory for Item-Specific Detail
title_short Temporal Regularity May Not Improve Memory for Item-Specific Detail
title_full Temporal Regularity May Not Improve Memory for Item-Specific Detail
title_fullStr Temporal Regularity May Not Improve Memory for Item-Specific Detail
title_full_unstemmed Temporal Regularity May Not Improve Memory for Item-Specific Detail
title_sort temporal regularity may not improve memory for item-specific detail
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Regularities in event timing allow for the allocation of attention to critical time-points when an event is most likely to occur, leading to improved visual perception. Results from recent studies indicate that similar benefits may extend to memory for scenes and objects. Here, we investigated whether benefits of temporal regularity are evident when detailed, item-specific representations are necessary for successful recognition memory performance. In Experiments 1 and 2, pictures of objects were presented with either predictable or randomized event timing, in separate encoding blocks. In the test phase, old and new objects were presented, intermixed with perceptually similar exemplars of encoded objects. In Experiment 3 we attempted to replicate previously reported memory enhancements for scenes. In contrast to predictions, temporal regularity did not affect response times (RT) or improve recognition memory accuracy in any of our experiments. These results suggest that any effects of temporal expectation on memory are subtle and may be sensitive to minor changes in task parameters. In sum, indirect upregulation of attention through imposed temporal structure may not be sufficient to have downstream effects on memory performance.
topic episodic memory
pattern separation
attention
entrainment
temporal expectation
timing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623402/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mrinmayikulkarni temporalregularitymaynotimprovememoryforitemspecificdetail
AT deborahehannula temporalregularitymaynotimprovememoryforitemspecificdetail
_version_ 1724225968206249984