The concept of “chaos measure” in the aspect of social synergetics

We understand chaos as a bifurcation process, the quantitative characteristic of which is reduced to the number of possibilities for the further evolution of the system, which in real time is directly expressed by self-oscillations of chaos and order (bifurcation cascade). The questions are being in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Busov Sergey, Zobova Maria, Rodukov Alexey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/13/shsconf_appsconf2019_01008.pdf
id doaj-ddca58be3ab345779bfca8035957e2e0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ddca58be3ab345779bfca8035957e2e02021-02-02T05:42:04ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242019-01-01720100810.1051/shsconf/20197201008shsconf_appsconf2019_01008The concept of “chaos measure” in the aspect of social synergeticsBusov Sergey0Zobova Maria1Rodukov Alexey2St. Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics (NRU ITMO), Center for Social and Humanitarian KnowledgeSaint-Petersburg State University of Telecommunications named after prof. M.A. Bonch-Bruevich, Department of Social and Political SciencesSaint-Petersburg State University of Telecommunications named after prof. M.A. Bonch-Bruevich, Department of Social and Political SciencesWe understand chaos as a bifurcation process, the quantitative characteristic of which is reduced to the number of possibilities for the further evolution of the system, which in real time is directly expressed by self-oscillations of chaos and order (bifurcation cascade). The questions are being investigated: the scientific correctness of such formulations as ―chaos measure‖, ―evolution of chaos‖, correlation of the concepts ―measure of chaos‖ and ―magnitude of entropy‖; does the concept of ―measure of chaos‖ correlate with the concept of entropy; how the concepts of ―measure of chaos‖ and ―measure of order‖ relate, and is it possible to ―control‖ chaos? Models that study the evolution of open systems provide a bifurcation picture of development opportunities in at least two directions: complication and simplification, progress and regression, hierarchization of systems and their de-hierarchization, where a quantitative measure of chaos corresponds to the number of possible outcomes. The conclusion drawn from this is that human influence on the vector of the evolutionary process is reduced to a deliberate impact on the structure, which is commonly called the norm: an individual is able to comprehend the "measure of chaos" of the system of which he is an element, correlate it with the "measure of order" of the system and, setting the norm, thereby determine the direction to the superattractor.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/13/shsconf_appsconf2019_01008.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Busov Sergey
Zobova Maria
Rodukov Alexey
spellingShingle Busov Sergey
Zobova Maria
Rodukov Alexey
The concept of “chaos measure” in the aspect of social synergetics
SHS Web of Conferences
author_facet Busov Sergey
Zobova Maria
Rodukov Alexey
author_sort Busov Sergey
title The concept of “chaos measure” in the aspect of social synergetics
title_short The concept of “chaos measure” in the aspect of social synergetics
title_full The concept of “chaos measure” in the aspect of social synergetics
title_fullStr The concept of “chaos measure” in the aspect of social synergetics
title_full_unstemmed The concept of “chaos measure” in the aspect of social synergetics
title_sort concept of “chaos measure” in the aspect of social synergetics
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2019-01-01
description We understand chaos as a bifurcation process, the quantitative characteristic of which is reduced to the number of possibilities for the further evolution of the system, which in real time is directly expressed by self-oscillations of chaos and order (bifurcation cascade). The questions are being investigated: the scientific correctness of such formulations as ―chaos measure‖, ―evolution of chaos‖, correlation of the concepts ―measure of chaos‖ and ―magnitude of entropy‖; does the concept of ―measure of chaos‖ correlate with the concept of entropy; how the concepts of ―measure of chaos‖ and ―measure of order‖ relate, and is it possible to ―control‖ chaos? Models that study the evolution of open systems provide a bifurcation picture of development opportunities in at least two directions: complication and simplification, progress and regression, hierarchization of systems and their de-hierarchization, where a quantitative measure of chaos corresponds to the number of possible outcomes. The conclusion drawn from this is that human influence on the vector of the evolutionary process is reduced to a deliberate impact on the structure, which is commonly called the norm: an individual is able to comprehend the "measure of chaos" of the system of which he is an element, correlate it with the "measure of order" of the system and, setting the norm, thereby determine the direction to the superattractor.
url https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/13/shsconf_appsconf2019_01008.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT busovsergey theconceptofchaosmeasureintheaspectofsocialsynergetics
AT zobovamaria theconceptofchaosmeasureintheaspectofsocialsynergetics
AT rodukovalexey theconceptofchaosmeasureintheaspectofsocialsynergetics
AT busovsergey conceptofchaosmeasureintheaspectofsocialsynergetics
AT zobovamaria conceptofchaosmeasureintheaspectofsocialsynergetics
AT rodukovalexey conceptofchaosmeasureintheaspectofsocialsynergetics
_version_ 1724302994852282368