Flexibility Control in Autonomous Demand Response by Optimal Power Tracking

In the regime of incentive-based autonomous demand response, time dependent prices are typically used to serve as signals from a system operator to consumers. However, this approach has been shown to be problematic from various perspectives. We clarify these shortcomings in a geometric way and there...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Klaus Rheinberger, Peter Kepplinger, Markus Preißinger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3568
id doaj-ddef2f6e9cc64324bcceb7d6111cab76
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ddef2f6e9cc64324bcceb7d6111cab762021-07-01T00:16:46ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-06-01143568356810.3390/en14123568Flexibility Control in Autonomous Demand Response by Optimal Power TrackingKlaus Rheinberger0Peter Kepplinger1Markus Preißinger2Energy Research Center, Vorarlberg University of Applied Sciences, Hochschulstraße 1, 6850 Dornbirn, AustriaEnergy Research Center, Vorarlberg University of Applied Sciences, Hochschulstraße 1, 6850 Dornbirn, AustriaEnergy Research Center, Vorarlberg University of Applied Sciences, Hochschulstraße 1, 6850 Dornbirn, AustriaIn the regime of incentive-based autonomous demand response, time dependent prices are typically used to serve as signals from a system operator to consumers. However, this approach has been shown to be problematic from various perspectives. We clarify these shortcomings in a geometric way and thereby motivate the use of power signals instead of price signals. The main contribution of this paper consists of demonstrating in a standard setting that power tracking signals can control flexibilities more efficiently than real-time price signals. For comparison by simulation, German renewable energy production and German standard load profiles are used for daily production and demand profiles, respectively. As for flexibility, an energy storage system with realistic efficiencies is considered. Most critically, the new approach is able to induce consumptions on the demand side that real-time pricing is unable to induce. Moreover, the pricing approach is outperformed with regards to imbalance energy, peak consumption, storage variation, and storage losses without the need for additional communication or computation efforts. It is further shown that the advantages of the optimal power tracking approach compared to the pricing approach increase with the extent of the flexibility. The results indicate that autonomous flexibility control by optimal power tracking is able to integrate renewable energy production efficiently, has additional benefits, and the potential for enhancements. The latter include data uncertainties, systems of flexibilities, and economic implementation.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3568demand responseenergy storageautonomous optimizationreal-time pricingpower tracking
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Klaus Rheinberger
Peter Kepplinger
Markus Preißinger
spellingShingle Klaus Rheinberger
Peter Kepplinger
Markus Preißinger
Flexibility Control in Autonomous Demand Response by Optimal Power Tracking
Energies
demand response
energy storage
autonomous optimization
real-time pricing
power tracking
author_facet Klaus Rheinberger
Peter Kepplinger
Markus Preißinger
author_sort Klaus Rheinberger
title Flexibility Control in Autonomous Demand Response by Optimal Power Tracking
title_short Flexibility Control in Autonomous Demand Response by Optimal Power Tracking
title_full Flexibility Control in Autonomous Demand Response by Optimal Power Tracking
title_fullStr Flexibility Control in Autonomous Demand Response by Optimal Power Tracking
title_full_unstemmed Flexibility Control in Autonomous Demand Response by Optimal Power Tracking
title_sort flexibility control in autonomous demand response by optimal power tracking
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2021-06-01
description In the regime of incentive-based autonomous demand response, time dependent prices are typically used to serve as signals from a system operator to consumers. However, this approach has been shown to be problematic from various perspectives. We clarify these shortcomings in a geometric way and thereby motivate the use of power signals instead of price signals. The main contribution of this paper consists of demonstrating in a standard setting that power tracking signals can control flexibilities more efficiently than real-time price signals. For comparison by simulation, German renewable energy production and German standard load profiles are used for daily production and demand profiles, respectively. As for flexibility, an energy storage system with realistic efficiencies is considered. Most critically, the new approach is able to induce consumptions on the demand side that real-time pricing is unable to induce. Moreover, the pricing approach is outperformed with regards to imbalance energy, peak consumption, storage variation, and storage losses without the need for additional communication or computation efforts. It is further shown that the advantages of the optimal power tracking approach compared to the pricing approach increase with the extent of the flexibility. The results indicate that autonomous flexibility control by optimal power tracking is able to integrate renewable energy production efficiently, has additional benefits, and the potential for enhancements. The latter include data uncertainties, systems of flexibilities, and economic implementation.
topic demand response
energy storage
autonomous optimization
real-time pricing
power tracking
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3568
work_keys_str_mv AT klausrheinberger flexibilitycontrolinautonomousdemandresponsebyoptimalpowertracking
AT peterkepplinger flexibilitycontrolinautonomousdemandresponsebyoptimalpowertracking
AT markuspreißinger flexibilitycontrolinautonomousdemandresponsebyoptimalpowertracking
_version_ 1721349148476702720