Role of Coflex as an Adjunct to Decompression for Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Study DesignProspective cohort study.PurposeTo assess whether additional implantation of Coflex following spinal decompression provided better clinical outcomes compared to decompression alone for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and to determine whether improvement in clinical outcomes corr...
Main Authors: | Naresh Kumar, Siddarth M Shah, Yau Hong Ng, Vinodh Kumar Pannierselvam, Sudeep DasDe, Liang Shen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Spine Society
2014-04-01
|
Series: | Asian Spine Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-8-161.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Decompression Surgery versus Interspinous Devices for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature
by: Jennifer Tram, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
The Experience of Using the Implantable Interspinous System COFLEX in the Surgical Treatment of Compression Forms of Lumbosacral Radiculitis
by: V. E. Potapov, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis
by: Nunley PD, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Interspinous Process Decompression With The Superion® Spacer For Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Real-World Experience From A Device Registry
by: Tekmyster G, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Surgical Role of Interspinous Distraction Devices (Coflex, DIAM) for the Treatment of Neurologic Pain and Intermittent Claudication Due to Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
by: Jui-Feng Lin, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01)