Application of Rationale and Argumentation in Refuting Up-to-date Myths and Stereotypes

Objectives To characterize rationale and argumentation as subjects of scientific research. To represent application of rationale and argumentation technology in on-line discussions on the basis of selected examples. Material and methods Analysis and generalization of scientific sources and document...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sofiia Sokolova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki Euroregionalnej im. Alcide De Gasperi 2020-02-01
Series:Journal of Modern Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalssystem.com/jms/Uzasadnianie-i-argumentowanie-w-komunikacji-z-osobami-poddanymi-mitom-i-stereotypom,117852,0,2.html
id doaj-de0d8adfc64b41f6931419396050debc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de0d8adfc64b41f6931419396050debc2020-11-25T03:43:33ZengWyższa Szkoła Gospodarki Euroregionalnej im. Alcide De GasperiJournal of Modern Science1734-20312391-789X2020-02-0143411913210.13166/jms/117852117852Application of Rationale and Argumentation in Refuting Up-to-date Myths and StereotypesSofiia Sokolova0WSGEObjectives To characterize rationale and argumentation as subjects of scientific research. To represent application of rationale and argumentation technology in on-line discussions on the basis of selected examples. Material and methods Analysis and generalization of scientific sources and documents was performed. Practice of using rationale and argumentation in on-line discussions was analyzed. The first discussion is an on-line dialog between a philosopher and an economist. The philosopher refutes the stereotypical position of his opponent consisting in denying importance of the humanities for the society and in the desire to achieve the abolition of funding for all humanitarian researches. The second example concerns the selection of arguments for dispelling the mythological worldview formed by the means of the Russian information propaganda regarding the Russian-Ukrainian war. Results - Conclusions In the age of information society, when information aggression is growing and increasingly turning into an information war, it is essential to be able to rationalize and argue own position as well as to unmask false statements. This skill is especially important in counteracting mythologization of the society and spread of stereotypes.http://www.journalssystem.com/jms/Uzasadnianie-i-argumentowanie-w-komunikacji-z-osobami-poddanymi-mitom-i-stereotypom,117852,0,2.htmlrationaleargumentationdiscussionconvictionsdisproof of stereotypemyth dispelling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sofiia Sokolova
spellingShingle Sofiia Sokolova
Application of Rationale and Argumentation in Refuting Up-to-date Myths and Stereotypes
Journal of Modern Science
rationale
argumentation
discussion
convictions
disproof of stereotype
myth dispelling
author_facet Sofiia Sokolova
author_sort Sofiia Sokolova
title Application of Rationale and Argumentation in Refuting Up-to-date Myths and Stereotypes
title_short Application of Rationale and Argumentation in Refuting Up-to-date Myths and Stereotypes
title_full Application of Rationale and Argumentation in Refuting Up-to-date Myths and Stereotypes
title_fullStr Application of Rationale and Argumentation in Refuting Up-to-date Myths and Stereotypes
title_full_unstemmed Application of Rationale and Argumentation in Refuting Up-to-date Myths and Stereotypes
title_sort application of rationale and argumentation in refuting up-to-date myths and stereotypes
publisher Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki Euroregionalnej im. Alcide De Gasperi
series Journal of Modern Science
issn 1734-2031
2391-789X
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Objectives To characterize rationale and argumentation as subjects of scientific research. To represent application of rationale and argumentation technology in on-line discussions on the basis of selected examples. Material and methods Analysis and generalization of scientific sources and documents was performed. Practice of using rationale and argumentation in on-line discussions was analyzed. The first discussion is an on-line dialog between a philosopher and an economist. The philosopher refutes the stereotypical position of his opponent consisting in denying importance of the humanities for the society and in the desire to achieve the abolition of funding for all humanitarian researches. The second example concerns the selection of arguments for dispelling the mythological worldview formed by the means of the Russian information propaganda regarding the Russian-Ukrainian war. Results - Conclusions In the age of information society, when information aggression is growing and increasingly turning into an information war, it is essential to be able to rationalize and argue own position as well as to unmask false statements. This skill is especially important in counteracting mythologization of the society and spread of stereotypes.
topic rationale
argumentation
discussion
convictions
disproof of stereotype
myth dispelling
url http://www.journalssystem.com/jms/Uzasadnianie-i-argumentowanie-w-komunikacji-z-osobami-poddanymi-mitom-i-stereotypom,117852,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT sofiiasokolova applicationofrationaleandargumentationinrefutinguptodatemythsandstereotypes
_version_ 1724519135960891392