Factors Affecting Smile Attractiveness: An Eye Tracking Study

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the buccal corridor width, gingival display, and upper midline deviation on smile aesthetics. Methods: A frontal posed smile photograph (reference photograph) of a young female was rearranged using digital imaging software to pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Murat Celikdelen, Ali Altug Bicakci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Amber Publication 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jrmds.in/articles/factors-affecting-smile-attractiveness-an-eye-tracking-study.pdf
id doaj-de1c1b3dcb5844399495dd3849d38890
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de1c1b3dcb5844399495dd3849d388902021-08-05T12:49:30ZengAmber PublicationJournal of Research in Medical and Dental Science2347-25452347-23672020-12-01865670Factors Affecting Smile Attractiveness: An Eye Tracking StudyMurat Celikdelen0Ali Altug Bicakci1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9476-7557Private practice, Giresun, TurkeyDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, TurkeyObjective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the buccal corridor width, gingival display, and upper midline deviation on smile aesthetics. Methods: A frontal posed smile photograph (reference photograph) of a young female was rearranged using digital imaging software to produce artificially created photographs that exhibited different buccal corridor widths, midline deviations, and gingival displays. A total of 21 images were obtained with reference photograph. While an eye tracking device was recording, each image was evaluated and assigned aesthetic scores by 16 laypeople (8 males, 8 female). A total of 336 laypeople participated in the study. A 5-point Likert scale was used for scoring. One-way ANOVA, Welch's T-test, Tukey’s HSD test, and Tamhane's T2 test were used for statistical analysis. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The highest and lowest scores were assigned to 2- and 8-mm buccal corridor widths, respectively. Gingival displays of +2 and above, and +5 mm and above were scored significantly lower than the reference image (p<0.05) by female and male participants, respectively. There was a significant difference in 6-mm gingival display for males (p<0.05). Conclusions: The different buccal corridor widths yielded no significant difference in attractiveness scores or focusing times for either gender. In the midline evaluation, even a deviation of 6 mm was not noticed by laypeople and was not found to be less attractive.https://www.jrmds.in/articles/factors-affecting-smile-attractiveness-an-eye-tracking-study.pdfbuccal corridoreye trackinggingival displaymidline deviation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Murat Celikdelen
Ali Altug Bicakci
spellingShingle Murat Celikdelen
Ali Altug Bicakci
Factors Affecting Smile Attractiveness: An Eye Tracking Study
Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
buccal corridor
eye tracking
gingival display
midline deviation
author_facet Murat Celikdelen
Ali Altug Bicakci
author_sort Murat Celikdelen
title Factors Affecting Smile Attractiveness: An Eye Tracking Study
title_short Factors Affecting Smile Attractiveness: An Eye Tracking Study
title_full Factors Affecting Smile Attractiveness: An Eye Tracking Study
title_fullStr Factors Affecting Smile Attractiveness: An Eye Tracking Study
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting Smile Attractiveness: An Eye Tracking Study
title_sort factors affecting smile attractiveness: an eye tracking study
publisher Amber Publication
series Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
issn 2347-2545
2347-2367
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the buccal corridor width, gingival display, and upper midline deviation on smile aesthetics. Methods: A frontal posed smile photograph (reference photograph) of a young female was rearranged using digital imaging software to produce artificially created photographs that exhibited different buccal corridor widths, midline deviations, and gingival displays. A total of 21 images were obtained with reference photograph. While an eye tracking device was recording, each image was evaluated and assigned aesthetic scores by 16 laypeople (8 males, 8 female). A total of 336 laypeople participated in the study. A 5-point Likert scale was used for scoring. One-way ANOVA, Welch's T-test, Tukey’s HSD test, and Tamhane's T2 test were used for statistical analysis. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The highest and lowest scores were assigned to 2- and 8-mm buccal corridor widths, respectively. Gingival displays of +2 and above, and +5 mm and above were scored significantly lower than the reference image (p<0.05) by female and male participants, respectively. There was a significant difference in 6-mm gingival display for males (p<0.05). Conclusions: The different buccal corridor widths yielded no significant difference in attractiveness scores or focusing times for either gender. In the midline evaluation, even a deviation of 6 mm was not noticed by laypeople and was not found to be less attractive.
topic buccal corridor
eye tracking
gingival display
midline deviation
url https://www.jrmds.in/articles/factors-affecting-smile-attractiveness-an-eye-tracking-study.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT muratcelikdelen factorsaffectingsmileattractivenessaneyetrackingstudy
AT alialtugbicakci factorsaffectingsmileattractivenessaneyetrackingstudy
_version_ 1721220941916143616