Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic

Purpose: To ascertain ophthalmologist's perceptions about webinars as a method of continued medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, a 21-question survey was circulated using digital media platform to approximately 1400 ophthalmologists in India betwe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rimpi Rana, Devesh Kumawat, Pranita Sahay, Neeraj Gour, Siddharth Patel, Ramanuj Samanta, Anupam Singh, Sanjeev Mittal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=4;spage=951;epage=957;aulast=Rana
id doaj-de505ebfe24446a49dce346272f39b11
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de505ebfe24446a49dce346272f39b112021-03-31T06:16:52ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892021-01-0169495195710.4103/ijo.IJO_3136_20Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemicRimpi RanaDevesh KumawatPranita SahayNeeraj GourSiddharth PatelRamanuj SamantaAnupam SinghSanjeev MittalPurpose: To ascertain ophthalmologist's perceptions about webinars as a method of continued medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, a 21-question survey was circulated using digital media platform to approximately 1400 ophthalmologists in India between 16th August 2020 to 31st August 2020. The questionnaire focussed on the quality and usefulness of webinars based on the Bloom's taxonomy. The responses (on 4- or 5-point Likert scale) were analyzed among three professional groups- ophthalmologists in-training, consultants in public sector, and private practitioners. Results: 393 ophthalmologists participated in the survey, with a response rate of 28%. The mean age was 34.6 ± 9.7 years, and males constituted 49.6% (199/393) of the respondents. Forty-seven percent of the respondents perceived the quality of webinars as good or excellent (185/393), 72.8% reported knowledge gain from webinars (286/393), and 63.9% felt that webinars are important in clinical practice and should continue post-COVID-19 pandemic (251/393), with distinct responses among the professional groups. The drawbacks perceived were overt number of webinars (371; 94.4%), confusion regarding which webinars to attend (313; 79.6%), repetition of the information (296; 75.3%), limited opportunity for participant interaction (146; 37.2%) and disparate weightage to the core disciplines of Ophthalmology. Conclusion: Most respondents had favorable perceptions of Ophthalmology webinars happening during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is need for improvisation in the volume of webinars, target-audience-based delivery, and participant interaction to add value to this new dimension of teaching-learning.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=4;spage=951;epage=957;aulast=Ranacovid-19e-learningmedical educationophthalmologywebinars
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rimpi Rana
Devesh Kumawat
Pranita Sahay
Neeraj Gour
Siddharth Patel
Ramanuj Samanta
Anupam Singh
Sanjeev Mittal
spellingShingle Rimpi Rana
Devesh Kumawat
Pranita Sahay
Neeraj Gour
Siddharth Patel
Ramanuj Samanta
Anupam Singh
Sanjeev Mittal
Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
covid-19
e-learning
medical education
ophthalmology
webinars
author_facet Rimpi Rana
Devesh Kumawat
Pranita Sahay
Neeraj Gour
Siddharth Patel
Ramanuj Samanta
Anupam Singh
Sanjeev Mittal
author_sort Rimpi Rana
title Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during covid-19 pandemic
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose: To ascertain ophthalmologist's perceptions about webinars as a method of continued medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, a 21-question survey was circulated using digital media platform to approximately 1400 ophthalmologists in India between 16th August 2020 to 31st August 2020. The questionnaire focussed on the quality and usefulness of webinars based on the Bloom's taxonomy. The responses (on 4- or 5-point Likert scale) were analyzed among three professional groups- ophthalmologists in-training, consultants in public sector, and private practitioners. Results: 393 ophthalmologists participated in the survey, with a response rate of 28%. The mean age was 34.6 ± 9.7 years, and males constituted 49.6% (199/393) of the respondents. Forty-seven percent of the respondents perceived the quality of webinars as good or excellent (185/393), 72.8% reported knowledge gain from webinars (286/393), and 63.9% felt that webinars are important in clinical practice and should continue post-COVID-19 pandemic (251/393), with distinct responses among the professional groups. The drawbacks perceived were overt number of webinars (371; 94.4%), confusion regarding which webinars to attend (313; 79.6%), repetition of the information (296; 75.3%), limited opportunity for participant interaction (146; 37.2%) and disparate weightage to the core disciplines of Ophthalmology. Conclusion: Most respondents had favorable perceptions of Ophthalmology webinars happening during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is need for improvisation in the volume of webinars, target-audience-based delivery, and participant interaction to add value to this new dimension of teaching-learning.
topic covid-19
e-learning
medical education
ophthalmology
webinars
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=4;spage=951;epage=957;aulast=Rana
work_keys_str_mv AT rimpirana perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT deveshkumawat perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT pranitasahay perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT neerajgour perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT siddharthpatel perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT ramanujsamanta perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT anupamsingh perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT sanjeevmittal perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
_version_ 1724178316654542848