ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO ENTRE CORRELACIONES EMPÍRICAS Y MODELOS MECANÍSTICOS PARA FLUJO MULTIFÁSICO EN POZOS HORIZONTALES DE INYECCIÓN DE VAPOR

he steam injection in horizontal wells has great applicability to heavy oil reservoirs. However, one of the challenges of this technology is the prediction of the profiles of pressure, temperature and vapor quality along the well. For over 30 years, empirical correlations were used to determine th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gustavo Rojas Sosa, Manuel Cabarcas Simancas
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Industrial de Santander 2011-12-01
Series:Revista Fuentes El Reventón Energético
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scienti.colciencias.gov.co/publindex/EnArticulo/all.do?cod_fasciculo=10
id doaj-de53df938f804e27861ad854b4968a5a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de53df938f804e27861ad854b4968a5a2020-11-25T02:22:56ZspaUniversidad Industrial de SantanderRevista Fuentes El Reventón Energético1657-65272145-85022011-12-01911322ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO ENTRE CORRELACIONES EMPÍRICAS Y MODELOS MECANÍSTICOS PARA FLUJO MULTIFÁSICO EN POZOS HORIZONTALES DE INYECCIÓN DE VAPORGustavo Rojas Sosa0Manuel Cabarcas Simancas 1UNIVERSIDAD INDUSTRIAL DE SANTANDERUNIVERSIDAD INDUSTRIAL DE SANTANDERhe steam injection in horizontal wells has great applicability to heavy oil reservoirs. However, one of the challenges of this technology is the prediction of the profiles of pressure, temperature and vapor quality along the well. For over 30 years, empirical correlations were used to determine these profiles, which have errors close to ± 30%. In recent years there has been greater emphasis on mechanistic models, allowing hydraulic profiles get more adjusted to reality and further predict the flow patterns that occur in the pipes. This paper evaluates the performance of three mechanistic models and five correlations commonly used to predict the pressure gradient in two-phase flow (wet steam), with application to horizontal wells, consisting of a vertical pipe section and other horizontal pipe section. The pressure gradient calculated with each model is compared with the experimental pressure gradient taken from two cases reported in the literature. We present error estimates of the pressure gradient measured versus calculated for each model. In the evaluation, two studied mechanistic models obtained lower mean absolute error of 10%.https://scienti.colciencias.gov.co/publindex/EnArticulo/all.do?cod_fasciculo=10mechanistic modelssteam injectionhorizontal wellsflow patterns.
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gustavo Rojas Sosa
Manuel Cabarcas Simancas
spellingShingle Gustavo Rojas Sosa
Manuel Cabarcas Simancas
ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO ENTRE CORRELACIONES EMPÍRICAS Y MODELOS MECANÍSTICOS PARA FLUJO MULTIFÁSICO EN POZOS HORIZONTALES DE INYECCIÓN DE VAPOR
Revista Fuentes El Reventón Energético
mechanistic models
steam injection
horizontal wells
flow patterns.
author_facet Gustavo Rojas Sosa
Manuel Cabarcas Simancas
author_sort Gustavo Rojas Sosa
title ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO ENTRE CORRELACIONES EMPÍRICAS Y MODELOS MECANÍSTICOS PARA FLUJO MULTIFÁSICO EN POZOS HORIZONTALES DE INYECCIÓN DE VAPOR
title_short ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO ENTRE CORRELACIONES EMPÍRICAS Y MODELOS MECANÍSTICOS PARA FLUJO MULTIFÁSICO EN POZOS HORIZONTALES DE INYECCIÓN DE VAPOR
title_full ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO ENTRE CORRELACIONES EMPÍRICAS Y MODELOS MECANÍSTICOS PARA FLUJO MULTIFÁSICO EN POZOS HORIZONTALES DE INYECCIÓN DE VAPOR
title_fullStr ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO ENTRE CORRELACIONES EMPÍRICAS Y MODELOS MECANÍSTICOS PARA FLUJO MULTIFÁSICO EN POZOS HORIZONTALES DE INYECCIÓN DE VAPOR
title_full_unstemmed ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO ENTRE CORRELACIONES EMPÍRICAS Y MODELOS MECANÍSTICOS PARA FLUJO MULTIFÁSICO EN POZOS HORIZONTALES DE INYECCIÓN DE VAPOR
title_sort estudio comparativo entre correlaciones empíricas y modelos mecanísticos para flujo multifásico en pozos horizontales de inyección de vapor
publisher Universidad Industrial de Santander
series Revista Fuentes El Reventón Energético
issn 1657-6527
2145-8502
publishDate 2011-12-01
description he steam injection in horizontal wells has great applicability to heavy oil reservoirs. However, one of the challenges of this technology is the prediction of the profiles of pressure, temperature and vapor quality along the well. For over 30 years, empirical correlations were used to determine these profiles, which have errors close to ± 30%. In recent years there has been greater emphasis on mechanistic models, allowing hydraulic profiles get more adjusted to reality and further predict the flow patterns that occur in the pipes. This paper evaluates the performance of three mechanistic models and five correlations commonly used to predict the pressure gradient in two-phase flow (wet steam), with application to horizontal wells, consisting of a vertical pipe section and other horizontal pipe section. The pressure gradient calculated with each model is compared with the experimental pressure gradient taken from two cases reported in the literature. We present error estimates of the pressure gradient measured versus calculated for each model. In the evaluation, two studied mechanistic models obtained lower mean absolute error of 10%.
topic mechanistic models
steam injection
horizontal wells
flow patterns.
url https://scienti.colciencias.gov.co/publindex/EnArticulo/all.do?cod_fasciculo=10
work_keys_str_mv AT gustavorojassosa estudiocomparativoentrecorrelacionesempiricasymodelosmecanisticosparaflujomultifasicoenpozoshorizontalesdeinyecciondevapor
AT manuelcabarcassimancas estudiocomparativoentrecorrelacionesempiricasymodelosmecanisticosparaflujomultifasicoenpozoshorizontalesdeinyecciondevapor
_version_ 1724860937752543232