Defining ecosystem thresholds for human activities and environmental pressures in the California Current

Abstract The oceans are changing more rapidly than ever before. Unprecedented climatic variability is interacting with unmistakable long‐term trends, all against a backdrop of intensifying human activities. What remains unclear, however, is how to evaluate whether conditions have changed sufficientl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jameal F. Samhouri, Kelly S. Andrews, Gavin Fay, Chris J. Harvey, Elliott L. Hazen, Shannon M. Hennessey, Kirstin Holsman, Mary E. Hunsicker, Scott I. Large, Kristin N. Marshall, Adrian C. Stier, Jamie C. Tam, Stephani G. Zador
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-06-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1860
id doaj-de93ec43de9a4cd2a1a425384b665bb0
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jameal F. Samhouri
Kelly S. Andrews
Gavin Fay
Chris J. Harvey
Elliott L. Hazen
Shannon M. Hennessey
Kirstin Holsman
Mary E. Hunsicker
Scott I. Large
Kristin N. Marshall
Adrian C. Stier
Jamie C. Tam
Stephani G. Zador
spellingShingle Jameal F. Samhouri
Kelly S. Andrews
Gavin Fay
Chris J. Harvey
Elliott L. Hazen
Shannon M. Hennessey
Kirstin Holsman
Mary E. Hunsicker
Scott I. Large
Kristin N. Marshall
Adrian C. Stier
Jamie C. Tam
Stephani G. Zador
Defining ecosystem thresholds for human activities and environmental pressures in the California Current
Ecosphere
ecosystem indicator
ecosystem threshold
ecosystem‐based management
nonlinear
reference points
author_facet Jameal F. Samhouri
Kelly S. Andrews
Gavin Fay
Chris J. Harvey
Elliott L. Hazen
Shannon M. Hennessey
Kirstin Holsman
Mary E. Hunsicker
Scott I. Large
Kristin N. Marshall
Adrian C. Stier
Jamie C. Tam
Stephani G. Zador
author_sort Jameal F. Samhouri
title Defining ecosystem thresholds for human activities and environmental pressures in the California Current
title_short Defining ecosystem thresholds for human activities and environmental pressures in the California Current
title_full Defining ecosystem thresholds for human activities and environmental pressures in the California Current
title_fullStr Defining ecosystem thresholds for human activities and environmental pressures in the California Current
title_full_unstemmed Defining ecosystem thresholds for human activities and environmental pressures in the California Current
title_sort defining ecosystem thresholds for human activities and environmental pressures in the california current
publisher Wiley
series Ecosphere
issn 2150-8925
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Abstract The oceans are changing more rapidly than ever before. Unprecedented climatic variability is interacting with unmistakable long‐term trends, all against a backdrop of intensifying human activities. What remains unclear, however, is how to evaluate whether conditions have changed sufficiently to provoke major responses of species, habitats, and communities. We developed a framework based on multimodel inference to define ecosystem‐based thresholds for human and environmental pressures in the California Current marine ecosystem. To demonstrate how to apply the framework, we explored two decades of data using gradient forest and generalized additive model analyses, screening for nonlinearities and potential threshold responses of ecosystem states (n = 9) across environmental (n = 6) and human (n = 10) pressures. These analyses identified the existence of threshold responses of five ecosystem states to four environmental and two human pressures. Both methods agreed on threshold relationships in two cases: (1) the winter copepod anomaly and habitat modification, and (2) sea lion pup production and the summer mode of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). Considered collectively, however, these alternative analytical approaches imply that as many as five of the nine ecosystem states may exhibit threshold changes in response to negative PDO values in the summer (copepods, scavengers, groundfish, and marine mammals). This result is consistent with the idea that the influence of the PDO extends across multiple trophic levels, but extends current knowledge by defining the nonlinear nature of these responses. This research provides a new way to interpret changes in the intensities of human and environmental pressures as they relate to the ecological integrity of the California Current ecosystem. These insights can be used to make more informed assessments of when and under what conditions intervention, preparation, and mitigation may enhance progress toward ecosystem‐based management goals.
topic ecosystem indicator
ecosystem threshold
ecosystem‐based management
nonlinear
reference points
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1860
work_keys_str_mv AT jamealfsamhouri definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
AT kellysandrews definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
AT gavinfay definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
AT chrisjharvey definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
AT elliottlhazen definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
AT shannonmhennessey definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
AT kirstinholsman definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
AT maryehunsicker definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
AT scottilarge definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
AT kristinnmarshall definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
AT adriancstier definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
AT jamiectam definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
AT stephanigzador definingecosystemthresholdsforhumanactivitiesandenvironmentalpressuresinthecaliforniacurrent
_version_ 1724999213539917824
spelling doaj-de93ec43de9a4cd2a1a425384b665bb02020-11-25T01:50:57ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252017-06-0186n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.1860Defining ecosystem thresholds for human activities and environmental pressures in the California CurrentJameal F. Samhouri0Kelly S. Andrews1Gavin Fay2Chris J. Harvey3Elliott L. Hazen4Shannon M. Hennessey5Kirstin Holsman6Mary E. Hunsicker7Scott I. Large8Kristin N. Marshall9Adrian C. Stier10Jamie C. Tam11Stephani G. Zador12Conservation Biology Division Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration 2725 Montlake Boulevard Seattle Washington 98112 USAConservation Biology Division Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration 2725 Montlake Boulevard Seattle Washington 98112 USADepartment of Fisheries Oceanography School for Marine Science and Technology University of Massachusetts Dartmouth 200 Mill Road Fairhaven Massachusetts 02719 USAConservation Biology Division Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration 2725 Montlake Boulevard Seattle Washington 98112 USAEnvironmental Research Division Southwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration 99 Pacific Street, Suite 255A Monterey California 93940 USADepartment of Integrative Biology Oregon State University 3029 Cordley Hall Corvallis Oregon 97331 USAResource Ecology & Fisheries Management Division Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration 7600 Sand Point Way N.E. Seattle Washington 98115 USAFish Ecology Division Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration 2032 SE OSU Drive Newport Oregon 97365 USAInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44‐46 1553 Copenhagen V DenmarkConservation Biology Division Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration 2725 Montlake Boulevard Seattle Washington 98112 USANational Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis 735 State Street Santa Barbara California 93101 USANortheast Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration 166 Water Street Woods Hole Massachusetts 02543 USAResource Ecology & Fisheries Management Division Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration 7600 Sand Point Way N.E. Seattle Washington 98115 USAAbstract The oceans are changing more rapidly than ever before. Unprecedented climatic variability is interacting with unmistakable long‐term trends, all against a backdrop of intensifying human activities. What remains unclear, however, is how to evaluate whether conditions have changed sufficiently to provoke major responses of species, habitats, and communities. We developed a framework based on multimodel inference to define ecosystem‐based thresholds for human and environmental pressures in the California Current marine ecosystem. To demonstrate how to apply the framework, we explored two decades of data using gradient forest and generalized additive model analyses, screening for nonlinearities and potential threshold responses of ecosystem states (n = 9) across environmental (n = 6) and human (n = 10) pressures. These analyses identified the existence of threshold responses of five ecosystem states to four environmental and two human pressures. Both methods agreed on threshold relationships in two cases: (1) the winter copepod anomaly and habitat modification, and (2) sea lion pup production and the summer mode of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). Considered collectively, however, these alternative analytical approaches imply that as many as five of the nine ecosystem states may exhibit threshold changes in response to negative PDO values in the summer (copepods, scavengers, groundfish, and marine mammals). This result is consistent with the idea that the influence of the PDO extends across multiple trophic levels, but extends current knowledge by defining the nonlinear nature of these responses. This research provides a new way to interpret changes in the intensities of human and environmental pressures as they relate to the ecological integrity of the California Current ecosystem. These insights can be used to make more informed assessments of when and under what conditions intervention, preparation, and mitigation may enhance progress toward ecosystem‐based management goals.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1860ecosystem indicatorecosystem thresholdecosystem‐based managementnonlinearreference points