Psychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of ICU patients during COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract Background During COVID-19 pandemic, visits have been prohibited in most French ICUs. Psychological effects, for reference persons (RPs), of remote-only communication have been assessed. Methods All RPs of patients referred to ICU for COVID-19 were included. HADS, IES-R, and satisfaction we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessy Cattelan, Sara Castellano, Hamid Merdji, Jean Audusseau, Baptiste Claude, Léa Feuillassier, Sibylle Cunat, Marc Astrié, Camille Aquin, Guillaume Buis, Edgar Gehant, Amandine Granier, Hassiba Kercha, Camille Le Guillou, Guillaume Martin, Kevin Roulot, Ferhat Meziani, Olivier Putois, Julie Helms
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Intensive Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00520-w
id doaj-de9d0dc041154dc08d94ee79271bfc16
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de9d0dc041154dc08d94ee79271bfc162021-01-10T12:14:58ZengBMCJournal of Intensive Care2052-04922021-01-019111110.1186/s40560-020-00520-wPsychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of ICU patients during COVID-19 pandemicJessy Cattelan0Sara Castellano1Hamid Merdji2Jean Audusseau3Baptiste Claude4Léa Feuillassier5Sibylle Cunat6Marc Astrié7Camille Aquin8Guillaume Buis9Edgar Gehant10Amandine Granier11Hassiba Kercha12Camille Le Guillou13Guillaume Martin14Kevin Roulot15Ferhat Meziani16Olivier Putois17Julie Helms18Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgSuLiSoM UR 3071, Faculté de Psychologie, Université de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgLPC UR 4440, Faculté de Psychologie, Université de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgSuLiSoM UR 3071, Faculté de Psychologie, Université de StrasbourgService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de StrasbourgAbstract Background During COVID-19 pandemic, visits have been prohibited in most French ICUs. Psychological effects, for reference persons (RPs), of remote-only communication have been assessed. Methods All RPs of patients referred to ICU for COVID-19 were included. HADS, IES-R, and satisfaction were evaluated at admission, discharge/death, and 3 months. At 3 months, a psychologist provided a qualitative description of RPs’ psychological distress. Results Eighty-eight RPs were included. Prevalence of anxiety and depression was 83% and 73% respectively. At 3 months, lower HADS decrease was associated with patient death/continued hospitalization, and/or sleeping disorders in RPs (p < 0.01). Ninety-nine percent RPs felt the patient was safe (9 [7; 10]/10 points, Likert-type scale), confident with caregivers (10 [9; 10]/10 points), and satisfied with information provided (10 [9; 10]/10 points). All RPs stressed the specific-type of “responsibility” associated with being an RP in a remote-only context, leading RPs to develop narrow diffusion strategies (67%) and restrict the array of contacted relatives to a very few and/or only contacting them rarely. 10 RPs (30%) related the situation to a prior traumatic experience. Conclusion RPs experienced psychological distress and reported that being an RP in a remote-only communication context was a specific responsibility and qualified it as an overall negative experience. Trial registration NCT04385121 . Registered 12 May 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ .https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00520-wCOVID-19; Reference person; Relative; Anxiety; Depression; Distress
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jessy Cattelan
Sara Castellano
Hamid Merdji
Jean Audusseau
Baptiste Claude
Léa Feuillassier
Sibylle Cunat
Marc Astrié
Camille Aquin
Guillaume Buis
Edgar Gehant
Amandine Granier
Hassiba Kercha
Camille Le Guillou
Guillaume Martin
Kevin Roulot
Ferhat Meziani
Olivier Putois
Julie Helms
spellingShingle Jessy Cattelan
Sara Castellano
Hamid Merdji
Jean Audusseau
Baptiste Claude
Léa Feuillassier
Sibylle Cunat
Marc Astrié
Camille Aquin
Guillaume Buis
Edgar Gehant
Amandine Granier
Hassiba Kercha
Camille Le Guillou
Guillaume Martin
Kevin Roulot
Ferhat Meziani
Olivier Putois
Julie Helms
Psychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of ICU patients during COVID-19 pandemic
Journal of Intensive Care
COVID-19; Reference person; Relative; Anxiety; Depression; Distress
author_facet Jessy Cattelan
Sara Castellano
Hamid Merdji
Jean Audusseau
Baptiste Claude
Léa Feuillassier
Sibylle Cunat
Marc Astrié
Camille Aquin
Guillaume Buis
Edgar Gehant
Amandine Granier
Hassiba Kercha
Camille Le Guillou
Guillaume Martin
Kevin Roulot
Ferhat Meziani
Olivier Putois
Julie Helms
author_sort Jessy Cattelan
title Psychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of ICU patients during COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Psychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of ICU patients during COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Psychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of ICU patients during COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Psychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of ICU patients during COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Psychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of ICU patients during COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort psychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of icu patients during covid-19 pandemic
publisher BMC
series Journal of Intensive Care
issn 2052-0492
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract Background During COVID-19 pandemic, visits have been prohibited in most French ICUs. Psychological effects, for reference persons (RPs), of remote-only communication have been assessed. Methods All RPs of patients referred to ICU for COVID-19 were included. HADS, IES-R, and satisfaction were evaluated at admission, discharge/death, and 3 months. At 3 months, a psychologist provided a qualitative description of RPs’ psychological distress. Results Eighty-eight RPs were included. Prevalence of anxiety and depression was 83% and 73% respectively. At 3 months, lower HADS decrease was associated with patient death/continued hospitalization, and/or sleeping disorders in RPs (p < 0.01). Ninety-nine percent RPs felt the patient was safe (9 [7; 10]/10 points, Likert-type scale), confident with caregivers (10 [9; 10]/10 points), and satisfied with information provided (10 [9; 10]/10 points). All RPs stressed the specific-type of “responsibility” associated with being an RP in a remote-only context, leading RPs to develop narrow diffusion strategies (67%) and restrict the array of contacted relatives to a very few and/or only contacting them rarely. 10 RPs (30%) related the situation to a prior traumatic experience. Conclusion RPs experienced psychological distress and reported that being an RP in a remote-only communication context was a specific responsibility and qualified it as an overall negative experience. Trial registration NCT04385121 . Registered 12 May 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ .
topic COVID-19; Reference person; Relative; Anxiety; Depression; Distress
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00520-w
work_keys_str_mv AT jessycattelan psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT saracastellano psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT hamidmerdji psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT jeanaudusseau psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT baptisteclaude psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT leafeuillassier psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT sibyllecunat psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT marcastrie psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT camilleaquin psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT guillaumebuis psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT edgargehant psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT amandinegranier psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT hassibakercha psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT camilleleguillou psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT guillaumemartin psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT kevinroulot psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT ferhatmeziani psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT olivierputois psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
AT juliehelms psychologicaleffectsofremoteonlycommunicationamongreferencepersonsoficupatientsduringcovid19pandemic
_version_ 1724343259106377728