Episodic and Semantic Memory Contribute to Familiar and Novel Episodic Future Thinking

Abstract Increasing evidence indicates that episodic future thinking (EFT) relies on both episodic and semantic memory; however, event familiarity may importantly affect the extent to which episodic and semantic memory contribute to EFT. To test this possibility, two behavioral experiments were cond...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tong Wang, Tong Yue, Xi ting Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01746/full
id doaj-debcd8f3f8504322b21d8992a848c794
record_format Article
spelling doaj-debcd8f3f8504322b21d8992a848c7942020-11-24T23:53:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-11-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.01746220296Episodic and Semantic Memory Contribute to Familiar and Novel Episodic Future ThinkingTong Wang0Tong Yue1Xi ting Huang2Faculty of Psychology, Southwest UniversityFaculty of Psychology, Southwest UniversityFaculty of Psychology, Southwest UniversityAbstract Increasing evidence indicates that episodic future thinking (EFT) relies on both episodic and semantic memory; however, event familiarity may importantly affect the extent to which episodic and semantic memory contribute to EFT. To test this possibility, two behavioral experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, we directly compared the proportion of episodic and semantic memory used in an EFT task. The results indicated that more episodic memory was used when imagining familiar future events compared with novel future events. Conversely, significantly more semantic memory was used when imagining novel events compared with familiar events. Experiment 2 aimed to verify the results of Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, we found that familiarity moderated the effect of priming the episodic memory system on EFT; particularly, it increased the time required to construct a standard familiar episodic future event, but did not significantly affect novel episodic event reaction time. Collectively, these findings support the hypothesis that event familiarity importantly moderates episodic and semantic memory’s contribution to EFT.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01746/fullepisodic memorySemantic memoryepisodic future thinkingModerating effectEvent familiarity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tong Wang
Tong Yue
Xi ting Huang
spellingShingle Tong Wang
Tong Yue
Xi ting Huang
Episodic and Semantic Memory Contribute to Familiar and Novel Episodic Future Thinking
Frontiers in Psychology
episodic memory
Semantic memory
episodic future thinking
Moderating effect
Event familiarity
author_facet Tong Wang
Tong Yue
Xi ting Huang
author_sort Tong Wang
title Episodic and Semantic Memory Contribute to Familiar and Novel Episodic Future Thinking
title_short Episodic and Semantic Memory Contribute to Familiar and Novel Episodic Future Thinking
title_full Episodic and Semantic Memory Contribute to Familiar and Novel Episodic Future Thinking
title_fullStr Episodic and Semantic Memory Contribute to Familiar and Novel Episodic Future Thinking
title_full_unstemmed Episodic and Semantic Memory Contribute to Familiar and Novel Episodic Future Thinking
title_sort episodic and semantic memory contribute to familiar and novel episodic future thinking
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2016-11-01
description Abstract Increasing evidence indicates that episodic future thinking (EFT) relies on both episodic and semantic memory; however, event familiarity may importantly affect the extent to which episodic and semantic memory contribute to EFT. To test this possibility, two behavioral experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, we directly compared the proportion of episodic and semantic memory used in an EFT task. The results indicated that more episodic memory was used when imagining familiar future events compared with novel future events. Conversely, significantly more semantic memory was used when imagining novel events compared with familiar events. Experiment 2 aimed to verify the results of Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, we found that familiarity moderated the effect of priming the episodic memory system on EFT; particularly, it increased the time required to construct a standard familiar episodic future event, but did not significantly affect novel episodic event reaction time. Collectively, these findings support the hypothesis that event familiarity importantly moderates episodic and semantic memory’s contribution to EFT.
topic episodic memory
Semantic memory
episodic future thinking
Moderating effect
Event familiarity
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01746/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tongwang episodicandsemanticmemorycontributetofamiliarandnovelepisodicfuturethinking
AT tongyue episodicandsemanticmemorycontributetofamiliarandnovelepisodicfuturethinking
AT xitinghuang episodicandsemanticmemorycontributetofamiliarandnovelepisodicfuturethinking
_version_ 1725470292881440768