Characterising hillslope–stream connectivity with a joint event analysis of stream and groundwater levels

<p>Hillslope–stream connectivity controls runoff generation, during events and during baseflow conditions. However, assessing subsurface connectivity is a challenging task, as it occurs in the hidden subsurface domain where water flow can not be easily observed. We therefore investigated if th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Beiter, M. Weiler, T. Blume
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-11-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/24/5713/2020/hess-24-5713-2020.pdf
id doaj-df1a441b3b394a41aa3161aef97a1624
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df1a441b3b394a41aa3161aef97a16242020-12-07T07:37:14ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382020-11-01245713574410.5194/hess-24-5713-2020Characterising hillslope–stream connectivity with a joint event analysis of stream and groundwater levelsD. Beiter0M. Weiler1T. Blume2GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section of Hydrology, Potsdam, GermanyUniversity of Freiburg, Chair of Hydrology, Freiburg, GermanyGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section of Hydrology, Potsdam, Germany<p>Hillslope–stream connectivity controls runoff generation, during events and during baseflow conditions. However, assessing subsurface connectivity is a challenging task, as it occurs in the hidden subsurface domain where water flow can not be easily observed. We therefore investigated if the results of a joint analysis of rainfall event responses of near-stream groundwater levels and stream water levels could serve as a viable proxy for hillslope–stream connectivity. The analysis focuses on the extent of response, correlations, lag times and synchronicity. As a first step, a new data analysis scheme was developed, separating the aspects of (a) response timing and (b) extent of water level change. This provides new perspectives on the relationship between groundwater and stream responses. In a second step we investigated if this analysis can give an indication of hillslope–stream connectivity at the catchment scale.</p> <p>Stream water levels and groundwater levels were measured at five different hillslopes over 5 to 6 years. Using a new detection algorithm, we extracted 706 rainfall response events for subsequent analysis. Carrying out this analysis in two different geological regions (schist and marls) allowed us to test the usefulness of the proxy under different hydrological settings while also providing insight into the geologically driven differences in response behaviour.</p> <p>For rainfall events with low initial groundwater level, groundwater level responses often lag behind the stream with respect to the start of rise and the time of peak. This lag disappears at high antecedent groundwater levels. At low groundwater levels the relationship between groundwater and stream water level responses to rainfall are highly variable, while at high groundwater levels, above a certain threshold, this relationship tends to become more uniform. The same threshold was able to predict increased likelihood for high runoff coefficients, indicating a strong increase in connectivity once the groundwater level threshold was surpassed.</p> <p>The joint analysis of shallow near-stream groundwater and stream water levels provided information on the presence or absence and to a certain extent also on the degree of subsurface hillslope–stream connectivity. The underlying threshold processes were interpreted as transmissivity feedback in the marls and fill-and-spill in the schist. The value of these measurements is high; however, time series of several years and a large number of events are necessary to produce representative results. We also find that locally measured thresholds in groundwater levels can provide insight into the connectivity and event response of the corresponding headwater catchments. If the location of the well is chosen wisely, a single time series of shallow groundwater can indicate if the catchment is in a state of high or low connectivity.</p>https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/24/5713/2020/hess-24-5713-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. Beiter
M. Weiler
T. Blume
spellingShingle D. Beiter
M. Weiler
T. Blume
Characterising hillslope–stream connectivity with a joint event analysis of stream and groundwater levels
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet D. Beiter
M. Weiler
T. Blume
author_sort D. Beiter
title Characterising hillslope–stream connectivity with a joint event analysis of stream and groundwater levels
title_short Characterising hillslope–stream connectivity with a joint event analysis of stream and groundwater levels
title_full Characterising hillslope–stream connectivity with a joint event analysis of stream and groundwater levels
title_fullStr Characterising hillslope–stream connectivity with a joint event analysis of stream and groundwater levels
title_full_unstemmed Characterising hillslope–stream connectivity with a joint event analysis of stream and groundwater levels
title_sort characterising hillslope–stream connectivity with a joint event analysis of stream and groundwater levels
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2020-11-01
description <p>Hillslope–stream connectivity controls runoff generation, during events and during baseflow conditions. However, assessing subsurface connectivity is a challenging task, as it occurs in the hidden subsurface domain where water flow can not be easily observed. We therefore investigated if the results of a joint analysis of rainfall event responses of near-stream groundwater levels and stream water levels could serve as a viable proxy for hillslope–stream connectivity. The analysis focuses on the extent of response, correlations, lag times and synchronicity. As a first step, a new data analysis scheme was developed, separating the aspects of (a) response timing and (b) extent of water level change. This provides new perspectives on the relationship between groundwater and stream responses. In a second step we investigated if this analysis can give an indication of hillslope–stream connectivity at the catchment scale.</p> <p>Stream water levels and groundwater levels were measured at five different hillslopes over 5 to 6 years. Using a new detection algorithm, we extracted 706 rainfall response events for subsequent analysis. Carrying out this analysis in two different geological regions (schist and marls) allowed us to test the usefulness of the proxy under different hydrological settings while also providing insight into the geologically driven differences in response behaviour.</p> <p>For rainfall events with low initial groundwater level, groundwater level responses often lag behind the stream with respect to the start of rise and the time of peak. This lag disappears at high antecedent groundwater levels. At low groundwater levels the relationship between groundwater and stream water level responses to rainfall are highly variable, while at high groundwater levels, above a certain threshold, this relationship tends to become more uniform. The same threshold was able to predict increased likelihood for high runoff coefficients, indicating a strong increase in connectivity once the groundwater level threshold was surpassed.</p> <p>The joint analysis of shallow near-stream groundwater and stream water levels provided information on the presence or absence and to a certain extent also on the degree of subsurface hillslope–stream connectivity. The underlying threshold processes were interpreted as transmissivity feedback in the marls and fill-and-spill in the schist. The value of these measurements is high; however, time series of several years and a large number of events are necessary to produce representative results. We also find that locally measured thresholds in groundwater levels can provide insight into the connectivity and event response of the corresponding headwater catchments. If the location of the well is chosen wisely, a single time series of shallow groundwater can indicate if the catchment is in a state of high or low connectivity.</p>
url https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/24/5713/2020/hess-24-5713-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dbeiter characterisinghillslopestreamconnectivitywithajointeventanalysisofstreamandgroundwaterlevels
AT mweiler characterisinghillslopestreamconnectivitywithajointeventanalysisofstreamandgroundwaterlevels
AT tblume characterisinghillslopestreamconnectivitywithajointeventanalysisofstreamandgroundwaterlevels
_version_ 1724397889761837056