Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update
The aim of this clinical study was to update the available data in the literature regarding the transfer accuracy (trueness/precision) of four current intraoral scanners (IOS) equipped with the latest software versions and to compare these data with conventional impressions (CVI). A metallic referen...
Main Authors: | Alexander Schmidt, Leona Klussmann, Bernd Wöstmann, Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/3/688 |
Similar Items
-
Digital versus Conventional Impression Taking Focusing on Interdental Areas: A Clinical Trial
by: Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Solid index versus intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: in vitro trueness evaluation
by: Francesco Guido Mangano, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study
by: Francesco Guido Mangano, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Assessment of Fit on Ten Screw-Retained FrameworksRealized through Digital Full-Arch Implant Impression
by: Maurizio De Francesco, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Complete-Arch Accuracy of Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
by: Giordano Celeghin, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)