Maximal assortative matching for complex

We define the problem of maximal assortativity matching (MAM) for a complex network graph as the problem of maximizing the similarity of the end vertices (with respect to some measure of node weight) constituting the matching. In this pursuit, we introduce a metric called the assortativity weight of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Natarajan Meghanathan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-04-01
Series:Journal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319157815001238
id doaj-df30585cf99c4abc9413de8fe8970f9a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df30585cf99c4abc9413de8fe8970f9a2020-11-24T23:03:38ZengElsevierJournal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences1319-15782016-04-0128223024610.1016/j.jksuci.2015.10.004Maximal assortative matching for complexNatarajan MeghanathanWe define the problem of maximal assortativity matching (MAM) for a complex network graph as the problem of maximizing the similarity of the end vertices (with respect to some measure of node weight) constituting the matching. In this pursuit, we introduce a metric called the assortativity weight of an edge, defined as the product of the number of uncovered adjacent edges and the absolute value of the difference in the weights of the end vertices. The MAM algorithm prefers to include edges that have the smallest assortativity weight in each iteration (one edge per iteration) until all edges are covered. The MAM algorithm can also be adapted to determine a maximal dissortative matching (MDM) to maximize the dissimilarity between the end vertices that are part of a matching as well as to determine a maximal node matching (MNM) that simply maximizes the number of vertices that are part of the matching. We run the MAM, MNM and MDM algorithms on real-world network graphs as well as on the theoretical model-based random network graphs and scale-free network graphs and analyze the tradeoffs between the % of node matches and assortativity index (targeted optimal values: 1 for MAM and −1 for MDM).http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319157815001238Maximal matchingAssortative matchingDissortative matchingAssortativity indexComplex networksNode similarity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Natarajan Meghanathan
spellingShingle Natarajan Meghanathan
Maximal assortative matching for complex
Journal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences
Maximal matching
Assortative matching
Dissortative matching
Assortativity index
Complex networks
Node similarity
author_facet Natarajan Meghanathan
author_sort Natarajan Meghanathan
title Maximal assortative matching for complex
title_short Maximal assortative matching for complex
title_full Maximal assortative matching for complex
title_fullStr Maximal assortative matching for complex
title_full_unstemmed Maximal assortative matching for complex
title_sort maximal assortative matching for complex
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences
issn 1319-1578
publishDate 2016-04-01
description We define the problem of maximal assortativity matching (MAM) for a complex network graph as the problem of maximizing the similarity of the end vertices (with respect to some measure of node weight) constituting the matching. In this pursuit, we introduce a metric called the assortativity weight of an edge, defined as the product of the number of uncovered adjacent edges and the absolute value of the difference in the weights of the end vertices. The MAM algorithm prefers to include edges that have the smallest assortativity weight in each iteration (one edge per iteration) until all edges are covered. The MAM algorithm can also be adapted to determine a maximal dissortative matching (MDM) to maximize the dissimilarity between the end vertices that are part of a matching as well as to determine a maximal node matching (MNM) that simply maximizes the number of vertices that are part of the matching. We run the MAM, MNM and MDM algorithms on real-world network graphs as well as on the theoretical model-based random network graphs and scale-free network graphs and analyze the tradeoffs between the % of node matches and assortativity index (targeted optimal values: 1 for MAM and −1 for MDM).
topic Maximal matching
Assortative matching
Dissortative matching
Assortativity index
Complex networks
Node similarity
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319157815001238
work_keys_str_mv AT natarajanmeghanathan maximalassortativematchingforcomplex
_version_ 1725632953345638400