Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions

This study compared two resin composites with similar filler systems and different matrix compositions. The depth of cure (DoC), polymerization shrinkage, and marginal leakage were evaluated. A Filtek Bulk Fill resin composite (FB) and a Filtek Supreme resin composite (FS) were used. For the DoC and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tarek M. Elshazly, Christoph Bourauel, Dalia I. Sherief, Dalia I. El-Korashy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Dentistry Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/8/3/76
id doaj-df3df43d8eee41f58cd5766d83d9000a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df3df43d8eee41f58cd5766d83d9000a2020-11-25T03:09:14ZengMDPI AGDentistry Journal2304-67672020-07-018767610.3390/dj8030076Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix CompositionsTarek M. Elshazly0Christoph Bourauel1Dalia I. Sherief2Dalia I. El-Korashy3Oral Technology, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, 53111 Bonn, GermanyOral Technology, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, 53111 Bonn, GermanyBiomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, 11566 Cairo, EgyptBiomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, 11566 Cairo, EgyptThis study compared two resin composites with similar filler systems and different matrix compositions. The depth of cure (DoC), polymerization shrinkage, and marginal leakage were evaluated. A Filtek Bulk Fill resin composite (FB) and a Filtek Supreme resin composite (FS) were used. For the DoC and polymerization shrinkage, cylindrical specimens with different thicknesses were prepared. The DoC was attributed to the bottom/top ratios of Vickers microhardness numbers. For polymerization shrinkage, each specimen was firstly scanned using micro-computed tomography (µCT) then cured for 20 s, then for 10 s, and then for 10 s, and they were rescanned between each curing time. Data were processed using the Mimics software. For marginal leakage, standardized 5 mm cavities were prepared in 90 molars. After etching and bonding, materials were packed according to groups: FB-bulk, FB-incremental, and FS-incremental, which were cured for 20, 30, and 40 s, respectively. After thermo-cycling, teeth were stored in 1% methylene blue dye for 24 h and then sectioned and observed for dye penetration. The results showed insignificant differences in the shrinkage and leakage between the different packing techniques and curing times of both materials. In conclusion, the introduction of a novel matrix into resin composite composition enabled bulk-filling in one layer up to 5 mm deep while keeping a tolerable polymerization shrinkage.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/8/3/76smart polymerspolymerization shrinkagebulk-fill resin compositemicroleakage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tarek M. Elshazly
Christoph Bourauel
Dalia I. Sherief
Dalia I. El-Korashy
spellingShingle Tarek M. Elshazly
Christoph Bourauel
Dalia I. Sherief
Dalia I. El-Korashy
Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
Dentistry Journal
smart polymers
polymerization shrinkage
bulk-fill resin composite
microleakage
author_facet Tarek M. Elshazly
Christoph Bourauel
Dalia I. Sherief
Dalia I. El-Korashy
author_sort Tarek M. Elshazly
title Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
title_short Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
title_full Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
title_fullStr Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
title_sort evaluation of two resin composites having different matrix compositions
publisher MDPI AG
series Dentistry Journal
issn 2304-6767
publishDate 2020-07-01
description This study compared two resin composites with similar filler systems and different matrix compositions. The depth of cure (DoC), polymerization shrinkage, and marginal leakage were evaluated. A Filtek Bulk Fill resin composite (FB) and a Filtek Supreme resin composite (FS) were used. For the DoC and polymerization shrinkage, cylindrical specimens with different thicknesses were prepared. The DoC was attributed to the bottom/top ratios of Vickers microhardness numbers. For polymerization shrinkage, each specimen was firstly scanned using micro-computed tomography (µCT) then cured for 20 s, then for 10 s, and then for 10 s, and they were rescanned between each curing time. Data were processed using the Mimics software. For marginal leakage, standardized 5 mm cavities were prepared in 90 molars. After etching and bonding, materials were packed according to groups: FB-bulk, FB-incremental, and FS-incremental, which were cured for 20, 30, and 40 s, respectively. After thermo-cycling, teeth were stored in 1% methylene blue dye for 24 h and then sectioned and observed for dye penetration. The results showed insignificant differences in the shrinkage and leakage between the different packing techniques and curing times of both materials. In conclusion, the introduction of a novel matrix into resin composite composition enabled bulk-filling in one layer up to 5 mm deep while keeping a tolerable polymerization shrinkage.
topic smart polymers
polymerization shrinkage
bulk-fill resin composite
microleakage
url https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/8/3/76
work_keys_str_mv AT tarekmelshazly evaluationoftworesincompositeshavingdifferentmatrixcompositions
AT christophbourauel evaluationoftworesincompositeshavingdifferentmatrixcompositions
AT daliaisherief evaluationoftworesincompositeshavingdifferentmatrixcompositions
AT daliaielkorashy evaluationoftworesincompositeshavingdifferentmatrixcompositions
_version_ 1724663828068696064