Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
This study compared two resin composites with similar filler systems and different matrix compositions. The depth of cure (DoC), polymerization shrinkage, and marginal leakage were evaluated. A Filtek Bulk Fill resin composite (FB) and a Filtek Supreme resin composite (FS) were used. For the DoC and...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Dentistry Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/8/3/76 |
id |
doaj-df3df43d8eee41f58cd5766d83d9000a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-df3df43d8eee41f58cd5766d83d9000a2020-11-25T03:09:14ZengMDPI AGDentistry Journal2304-67672020-07-018767610.3390/dj8030076Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix CompositionsTarek M. Elshazly0Christoph Bourauel1Dalia I. Sherief2Dalia I. El-Korashy3Oral Technology, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, 53111 Bonn, GermanyOral Technology, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, 53111 Bonn, GermanyBiomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, 11566 Cairo, EgyptBiomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, 11566 Cairo, EgyptThis study compared two resin composites with similar filler systems and different matrix compositions. The depth of cure (DoC), polymerization shrinkage, and marginal leakage were evaluated. A Filtek Bulk Fill resin composite (FB) and a Filtek Supreme resin composite (FS) were used. For the DoC and polymerization shrinkage, cylindrical specimens with different thicknesses were prepared. The DoC was attributed to the bottom/top ratios of Vickers microhardness numbers. For polymerization shrinkage, each specimen was firstly scanned using micro-computed tomography (µCT) then cured for 20 s, then for 10 s, and then for 10 s, and they were rescanned between each curing time. Data were processed using the Mimics software. For marginal leakage, standardized 5 mm cavities were prepared in 90 molars. After etching and bonding, materials were packed according to groups: FB-bulk, FB-incremental, and FS-incremental, which were cured for 20, 30, and 40 s, respectively. After thermo-cycling, teeth were stored in 1% methylene blue dye for 24 h and then sectioned and observed for dye penetration. The results showed insignificant differences in the shrinkage and leakage between the different packing techniques and curing times of both materials. In conclusion, the introduction of a novel matrix into resin composite composition enabled bulk-filling in one layer up to 5 mm deep while keeping a tolerable polymerization shrinkage.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/8/3/76smart polymerspolymerization shrinkagebulk-fill resin compositemicroleakage |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tarek M. Elshazly Christoph Bourauel Dalia I. Sherief Dalia I. El-Korashy |
spellingShingle |
Tarek M. Elshazly Christoph Bourauel Dalia I. Sherief Dalia I. El-Korashy Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions Dentistry Journal smart polymers polymerization shrinkage bulk-fill resin composite microleakage |
author_facet |
Tarek M. Elshazly Christoph Bourauel Dalia I. Sherief Dalia I. El-Korashy |
author_sort |
Tarek M. Elshazly |
title |
Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions |
title_short |
Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions |
title_full |
Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions |
title_sort |
evaluation of two resin composites having different matrix compositions |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Dentistry Journal |
issn |
2304-6767 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
This study compared two resin composites with similar filler systems and different matrix compositions. The depth of cure (DoC), polymerization shrinkage, and marginal leakage were evaluated. A Filtek Bulk Fill resin composite (FB) and a Filtek Supreme resin composite (FS) were used. For the DoC and polymerization shrinkage, cylindrical specimens with different thicknesses were prepared. The DoC was attributed to the bottom/top ratios of Vickers microhardness numbers. For polymerization shrinkage, each specimen was firstly scanned using micro-computed tomography (µCT) then cured for 20 s, then for 10 s, and then for 10 s, and they were rescanned between each curing time. Data were processed using the Mimics software. For marginal leakage, standardized 5 mm cavities were prepared in 90 molars. After etching and bonding, materials were packed according to groups: FB-bulk, FB-incremental, and FS-incremental, which were cured for 20, 30, and 40 s, respectively. After thermo-cycling, teeth were stored in 1% methylene blue dye for 24 h and then sectioned and observed for dye penetration. The results showed insignificant differences in the shrinkage and leakage between the different packing techniques and curing times of both materials. In conclusion, the introduction of a novel matrix into resin composite composition enabled bulk-filling in one layer up to 5 mm deep while keeping a tolerable polymerization shrinkage. |
topic |
smart polymers polymerization shrinkage bulk-fill resin composite microleakage |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/8/3/76 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tarekmelshazly evaluationoftworesincompositeshavingdifferentmatrixcompositions AT christophbourauel evaluationoftworesincompositeshavingdifferentmatrixcompositions AT daliaisherief evaluationoftworesincompositeshavingdifferentmatrixcompositions AT daliaielkorashy evaluationoftworesincompositeshavingdifferentmatrixcompositions |
_version_ |
1724663828068696064 |