Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome
Patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a range of auditory and/or vestibular signs and symptoms that are associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal (SSC). Over the past two decades, advances in diagnostic techniques have raised the awareness of...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neurology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.638574/full |
id |
doaj-dfa77f3105df4315a2ec3558466ca8ab |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dfa77f3105df4315a2ec3558466ca8ab2021-04-06T04:36:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952021-04-011210.3389/fneur.2021.638574638574Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence SyndromeKristine Elisabeth Eberhard0Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard1Divya A. Chari2Hideko Heidi Nakajima3Mads Klokker4Mads Klokker5Per Cayé-Thomasen6Per Cayé-Thomasen7Daniel J. Lee8Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesCopenhagen Hearing and Balance Centre, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesCopenhagen Hearing and Balance Centre, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, DenmarkFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkCopenhagen Hearing and Balance Centre, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, DenmarkFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesPatients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a range of auditory and/or vestibular signs and symptoms that are associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal (SSC). Over the past two decades, advances in diagnostic techniques have raised the awareness of SCDS and treatment approaches have been refined to improve patient outcomes. However, a number of challenges remain. First, there is currently no standardized clinical testing algorithm for quantifying the effects of superior canal dehiscence (SCD). SCDS mimics a number of common otologic disorders and established metrics such as supranormal bone conduction thresholds and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) measurements; although useful in certain cases, have diagnostic limitations. Second, while high-resolution computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the detection of SCD, a bony defect does not always result in signs and symptoms. Third, even when SCD repair is indicated, there is a lack of consensus about nomenclature to describe the SCD, ideal surgical approach, specific repair techniques, and type of materials used. Finally, there is no established algorithm in evaluation of SCDS patients who fail primary repair and may be candidates for revision surgery. Herein, we will discuss both contemporary and emerging diagnostic approaches for patients with SCDS and highlight challenges and controversies in the management of this unique patient cohort.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.638574/fullsuperior canal dehiscencesemicircular canal dehiscencethird window syndromeSCDSSCDcraniotomy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard Divya A. Chari Hideko Heidi Nakajima Mads Klokker Mads Klokker Per Cayé-Thomasen Per Cayé-Thomasen Daniel J. Lee |
spellingShingle |
Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard Divya A. Chari Hideko Heidi Nakajima Mads Klokker Mads Klokker Per Cayé-Thomasen Per Cayé-Thomasen Daniel J. Lee Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome Frontiers in Neurology superior canal dehiscence semicircular canal dehiscence third window syndrome SCD SSCD craniotomy |
author_facet |
Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard Divya A. Chari Hideko Heidi Nakajima Mads Klokker Mads Klokker Per Cayé-Thomasen Per Cayé-Thomasen Daniel J. Lee |
author_sort |
Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard |
title |
Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome |
title_short |
Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome |
title_full |
Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome |
title_fullStr |
Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed |
Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome |
title_sort |
current trends, controversies, and future directions in the evaluation and management of superior canal dehiscence syndrome |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Neurology |
issn |
1664-2295 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a range of auditory and/or vestibular signs and symptoms that are associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal (SSC). Over the past two decades, advances in diagnostic techniques have raised the awareness of SCDS and treatment approaches have been refined to improve patient outcomes. However, a number of challenges remain. First, there is currently no standardized clinical testing algorithm for quantifying the effects of superior canal dehiscence (SCD). SCDS mimics a number of common otologic disorders and established metrics such as supranormal bone conduction thresholds and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) measurements; although useful in certain cases, have diagnostic limitations. Second, while high-resolution computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the detection of SCD, a bony defect does not always result in signs and symptoms. Third, even when SCD repair is indicated, there is a lack of consensus about nomenclature to describe the SCD, ideal surgical approach, specific repair techniques, and type of materials used. Finally, there is no established algorithm in evaluation of SCDS patients who fail primary repair and may be candidates for revision surgery. Herein, we will discuss both contemporary and emerging diagnostic approaches for patients with SCDS and highlight challenges and controversies in the management of this unique patient cohort. |
topic |
superior canal dehiscence semicircular canal dehiscence third window syndrome SCD SSCD craniotomy |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.638574/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kristineelisabetheberhard currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome AT kristineelisabetheberhard currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome AT divyaachari currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome AT hidekoheidinakajima currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome AT madsklokker currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome AT madsklokker currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome AT percayethomasen currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome AT percayethomasen currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome AT danieljlee currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome |
_version_ |
1721538605038436352 |