Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

Patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a range of auditory and/or vestibular signs and symptoms that are associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal (SSC). Over the past two decades, advances in diagnostic techniques have raised the awareness of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard, Divya A. Chari, Hideko Heidi Nakajima, Mads Klokker, Per Cayé-Thomasen, Daniel J. Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
SCD
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.638574/full
id doaj-dfa77f3105df4315a2ec3558466ca8ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dfa77f3105df4315a2ec3558466ca8ab2021-04-06T04:36:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952021-04-011210.3389/fneur.2021.638574638574Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence SyndromeKristine Elisabeth Eberhard0Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard1Divya A. Chari2Hideko Heidi Nakajima3Mads Klokker4Mads Klokker5Per Cayé-Thomasen6Per Cayé-Thomasen7Daniel J. Lee8Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesCopenhagen Hearing and Balance Centre, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesCopenhagen Hearing and Balance Centre, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, DenmarkFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkCopenhagen Hearing and Balance Centre, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, DenmarkFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesPatients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a range of auditory and/or vestibular signs and symptoms that are associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal (SSC). Over the past two decades, advances in diagnostic techniques have raised the awareness of SCDS and treatment approaches have been refined to improve patient outcomes. However, a number of challenges remain. First, there is currently no standardized clinical testing algorithm for quantifying the effects of superior canal dehiscence (SCD). SCDS mimics a number of common otologic disorders and established metrics such as supranormal bone conduction thresholds and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) measurements; although useful in certain cases, have diagnostic limitations. Second, while high-resolution computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the detection of SCD, a bony defect does not always result in signs and symptoms. Third, even when SCD repair is indicated, there is a lack of consensus about nomenclature to describe the SCD, ideal surgical approach, specific repair techniques, and type of materials used. Finally, there is no established algorithm in evaluation of SCDS patients who fail primary repair and may be candidates for revision surgery. Herein, we will discuss both contemporary and emerging diagnostic approaches for patients with SCDS and highlight challenges and controversies in the management of this unique patient cohort.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.638574/fullsuperior canal dehiscencesemicircular canal dehiscencethird window syndromeSCDSSCDcraniotomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard
Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard
Divya A. Chari
Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Mads Klokker
Mads Klokker
Per Cayé-Thomasen
Per Cayé-Thomasen
Daniel J. Lee
spellingShingle Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard
Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard
Divya A. Chari
Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Mads Klokker
Mads Klokker
Per Cayé-Thomasen
Per Cayé-Thomasen
Daniel J. Lee
Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome
Frontiers in Neurology
superior canal dehiscence
semicircular canal dehiscence
third window syndrome
SCD
SSCD
craniotomy
author_facet Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard
Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard
Divya A. Chari
Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Mads Klokker
Mads Klokker
Per Cayé-Thomasen
Per Cayé-Thomasen
Daniel J. Lee
author_sort Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard
title Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome
title_short Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome
title_full Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome
title_fullStr Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome
title_sort current trends, controversies, and future directions in the evaluation and management of superior canal dehiscence syndrome
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a range of auditory and/or vestibular signs and symptoms that are associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal (SSC). Over the past two decades, advances in diagnostic techniques have raised the awareness of SCDS and treatment approaches have been refined to improve patient outcomes. However, a number of challenges remain. First, there is currently no standardized clinical testing algorithm for quantifying the effects of superior canal dehiscence (SCD). SCDS mimics a number of common otologic disorders and established metrics such as supranormal bone conduction thresholds and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) measurements; although useful in certain cases, have diagnostic limitations. Second, while high-resolution computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the detection of SCD, a bony defect does not always result in signs and symptoms. Third, even when SCD repair is indicated, there is a lack of consensus about nomenclature to describe the SCD, ideal surgical approach, specific repair techniques, and type of materials used. Finally, there is no established algorithm in evaluation of SCDS patients who fail primary repair and may be candidates for revision surgery. Herein, we will discuss both contemporary and emerging diagnostic approaches for patients with SCDS and highlight challenges and controversies in the management of this unique patient cohort.
topic superior canal dehiscence
semicircular canal dehiscence
third window syndrome
SCD
SSCD
craniotomy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.638574/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kristineelisabetheberhard currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome
AT kristineelisabetheberhard currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome
AT divyaachari currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome
AT hidekoheidinakajima currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome
AT madsklokker currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome
AT madsklokker currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome
AT percayethomasen currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome
AT percayethomasen currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome
AT danieljlee currenttrendscontroversiesandfuturedirectionsintheevaluationandmanagementofsuperiorcanaldehiscencesyndrome
_version_ 1721538605038436352