Comparative characteristics of porous bioceramics for an osteogenic response in vitro and in vivo.

Porous calcium phosphate ceramics are used in orthopedic and craniofacial applications to treat bone loss, or in dental applications to replace missing teeth. The implantation of these materials, however, does not induce stem cell differentiation, so suitable additional materials such as porous calc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hye-Rim Lee, Han-Jun Kim, Ji-Seung Ko, Yong-Suk Choi, Myun-Whan Ahn, Sukyoung Kim, Sun Hee Do
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3877265?pdf=render
id doaj-dfbdfcbf3af543ed934b28d2847d6a98
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dfbdfcbf3af543ed934b28d2847d6a982020-11-24T21:45:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8427210.1371/journal.pone.0084272Comparative characteristics of porous bioceramics for an osteogenic response in vitro and in vivo.Hye-Rim LeeHan-Jun KimJi-Seung KoYong-Suk ChoiMyun-Whan AhnSukyoung KimSun Hee DoPorous calcium phosphate ceramics are used in orthopedic and craniofacial applications to treat bone loss, or in dental applications to replace missing teeth. The implantation of these materials, however, does not induce stem cell differentiation, so suitable additional materials such as porous calcium phosphate discs are needed to influence physicochemical responses or structural changes. Rabbit adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) and mouse osteoblastic cells (MC3T3-E1) were evaluated in vitro by the MTT assay, semi-quantitative RT-PCR, and immunoblotting using cells cultured in medium supplemented with extracts from bioceramics, including calcium metaphosphate (CMP), hydroxyapatite (HA) and collagen-grafted HA (HA-col). In vivo evaluation of the bone forming capacity of these bioceramics in rat models using femur defects and intramuscular implants for 12 weeks was performed. Histological analysis showed that newly formed stromal-rich tissues were observed in all the implanted regions and that the implants showed positive immunoreaction against type I collagen and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The intramuscular implant region, in particular, showed strong positive immunoreactivity for both type I collagen and ALP, which was further confirmed by mRNA expression and immunoblotting results, indicating that each bioceramic material enhanced osteogenesis stimulation. These results support our hypothesis that smart bioceramics can induce osteoconduction and osteoinduction in vivo, although mature bone formation, including lacunae, osteocytes, and mineralization, was not prominent until 12 weeks after implantation.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3877265?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hye-Rim Lee
Han-Jun Kim
Ji-Seung Ko
Yong-Suk Choi
Myun-Whan Ahn
Sukyoung Kim
Sun Hee Do
spellingShingle Hye-Rim Lee
Han-Jun Kim
Ji-Seung Ko
Yong-Suk Choi
Myun-Whan Ahn
Sukyoung Kim
Sun Hee Do
Comparative characteristics of porous bioceramics for an osteogenic response in vitro and in vivo.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Hye-Rim Lee
Han-Jun Kim
Ji-Seung Ko
Yong-Suk Choi
Myun-Whan Ahn
Sukyoung Kim
Sun Hee Do
author_sort Hye-Rim Lee
title Comparative characteristics of porous bioceramics for an osteogenic response in vitro and in vivo.
title_short Comparative characteristics of porous bioceramics for an osteogenic response in vitro and in vivo.
title_full Comparative characteristics of porous bioceramics for an osteogenic response in vitro and in vivo.
title_fullStr Comparative characteristics of porous bioceramics for an osteogenic response in vitro and in vivo.
title_full_unstemmed Comparative characteristics of porous bioceramics for an osteogenic response in vitro and in vivo.
title_sort comparative characteristics of porous bioceramics for an osteogenic response in vitro and in vivo.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Porous calcium phosphate ceramics are used in orthopedic and craniofacial applications to treat bone loss, or in dental applications to replace missing teeth. The implantation of these materials, however, does not induce stem cell differentiation, so suitable additional materials such as porous calcium phosphate discs are needed to influence physicochemical responses or structural changes. Rabbit adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) and mouse osteoblastic cells (MC3T3-E1) were evaluated in vitro by the MTT assay, semi-quantitative RT-PCR, and immunoblotting using cells cultured in medium supplemented with extracts from bioceramics, including calcium metaphosphate (CMP), hydroxyapatite (HA) and collagen-grafted HA (HA-col). In vivo evaluation of the bone forming capacity of these bioceramics in rat models using femur defects and intramuscular implants for 12 weeks was performed. Histological analysis showed that newly formed stromal-rich tissues were observed in all the implanted regions and that the implants showed positive immunoreaction against type I collagen and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The intramuscular implant region, in particular, showed strong positive immunoreactivity for both type I collagen and ALP, which was further confirmed by mRNA expression and immunoblotting results, indicating that each bioceramic material enhanced osteogenesis stimulation. These results support our hypothesis that smart bioceramics can induce osteoconduction and osteoinduction in vivo, although mature bone formation, including lacunae, osteocytes, and mineralization, was not prominent until 12 weeks after implantation.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3877265?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT hyerimlee comparativecharacteristicsofporousbioceramicsforanosteogenicresponseinvitroandinvivo
AT hanjunkim comparativecharacteristicsofporousbioceramicsforanosteogenicresponseinvitroandinvivo
AT jiseungko comparativecharacteristicsofporousbioceramicsforanosteogenicresponseinvitroandinvivo
AT yongsukchoi comparativecharacteristicsofporousbioceramicsforanosteogenicresponseinvitroandinvivo
AT myunwhanahn comparativecharacteristicsofporousbioceramicsforanosteogenicresponseinvitroandinvivo
AT sukyoungkim comparativecharacteristicsofporousbioceramicsforanosteogenicresponseinvitroandinvivo
AT sunheedo comparativecharacteristicsofporousbioceramicsforanosteogenicresponseinvitroandinvivo
_version_ 1725905341388947456